A military organization may be considered to have a role culture. The ranks define peoples' jobs and roles. The tall organizational structure and many levels of hierarchy also lend itself to role culture.
However, the project teams such as the SAS, SBS, Green Berets and other non-traditional specialized military units are much more task culture orientated.
The organizational culture of military organizations such as the UWP Mission has the following advantages:
- the culture is characterised by a desire for stability and control as well as formal rules and policy, so it is congruent with a tall structure and an autocratic leadership style (such as General Ron Meiri)
- orders are always followed, so the organization can be very efficient with regard to operations and tactics, as it is goal-orientated and results-orientated (for example, if they decide to build the hospital, it will happen)
- the organization promotes from within, so staff know the routes for promotion and have a strong sense of respect for seniority (as showed by the relationship between Colonel Michael Donovan and General Diane Pierce)
- accept any other relevant advantage.
The organizational culture of military organizations such as the UWP Mission has the following disadvantages:
- the focus on well-established norms and values means that the organization could ignore the norms and values of the society where it operates (here: possible tension with Loykese culture)
- the stable culture of the military implies a resistance to change, be it as a result of internal or of external forces (so even the arrival of General Diane Pierce with her situational leadership style could create some tension with some staff more used to an autocratic leadership style)
- new ideas are not sought and are rarely welcome (so even if some members of the civil engineering group under Colonel Michael Donovan have valid ideas or objections, they are not likely to raise them)
- accept any other relevant disadvantage.
Accept any other relevant explanation.
Mark as 2+2.
Award [1 mark] for each correct advantage/disadvantage identified and [1 mark] for an appropriate explanation of that advantage/disadvantage up to a maximum of [2 marks].
N.B. Candidates that only focus on organizational structures can only achieve a maximum of [2 marks].