AP Statistics 5.4 Residuals Overview
Calculate and interpret residuals, then use residual plots and their patterns to decide whether a linear regression model is appropriate for the data.
- Syllabus
- Effective Fall 2025
- Course
- AP Statistics
Calculate and interpret residuals, then use residual plots and their patterns to decide whether a linear regression model is appropriate for the data.
A biologist gathered data on the length, in millimeters (mm), and the mass, in grams (g), for 11 bullfrogs. The data are shown in Plot 1.

From the data, the biologist calculated the least-squares regression line for predicting mass from length. The least-squares regression line is shown in Plot 2.

Official question visual
From Plot 2, consider the residuals of the 11 bullfrogs.
Based on the plot, approximately what is the length and mass of the bullfrog with the largest absolute value residual?
The largest residual in absolute value belongs to the bullfrog with length 162 millimeters and mass 356 grams.
Scoring:
Essentially correct (E) if the response identifies the correct bullfrog, with length between 160 and 165 millimeters and mass between 350 and 375 grams.
Partially correct (P) if the response does not satisfy the complete criterion but identifies a relevant residual observation.
Incorrect (I) if the response does not meet the criteria for E or P.
Does the least-squares regression line overestimate or underestimate the mass of the bullfrog identified in part (d-i)? Explain your answer.
The least-squares regression line overestimates the mass of the bullfrog with length 162 millimeters. Plot 2 shows that the point for the bullfrog with length 162 millimeters is below the least-squares regression line.
Scoring:
Essentially correct (E) if the response explicitly indicates whether the linear model overestimates or underestimates mass for the identified bullfrog and provides a correct justification based on comparison with the least-squares regression line.
Partially correct (P) if the response satisfies only one of these two components.
Incorrect (I) if the response does not meet the criteria for E or P.
Jamal is researching the characteristics of a car that might be useful in predicting the fuel consumption rate (FCR); that is, the number of gallons of gasoline that the car requires to travel 100 miles under conditions of typical city driving. The length of a car is one explanatory variable that can be used to predict FCR. Graph I is a scatterplot showing the lengths of 66 cars plotted with the corresponding FCR. One point on the graph is labeled A.

GRAPH I
Jamal examined the scatterplot and determined that a linear model would be a reasonable way to express the relationship between FCR and length. A computer output from a linear regression is shown below.
Linear Fit
FCR=−1.595789+0.0372614∗ Length
Summary of Fit


Part (a):
For a car with length 175 inches, the predicted value for the car's FCR, based on the least squares regression line, is
The actual FCR for the car is 5.88, so the residual is 5.88-4.92=0.96. The residual value means that the car's FCR is 0.96 gallons per 100 miles greater than would be predicted for a car of its length.
Part (b):
In graph II, the point labeled A corresponds to the same car whose point was labeled A in graph I. The measurements for the car represented by point A are given below.

Circle the point on graph III that corresponds to the car represented by point A on graphs I and II.
The point with a wheel base of 93 inches and a residual of 0.96 gallons per 100 miles is circled in graph III below.

There is a point on graph III labeled B. It is very close to the horizontal line at 0. What does that indicate about the FCR of the car represented by point B?
Point B corresponds to a car with an actual FCR that is very close to the FCR that would be predicted for a car with its length by the regression model which predicts FCR using the explanatory variable length.
Write a few sentences to compare the association between the variables in graph II with the association between the variables in graph III.
Part (c):
Graph II reveals a moderate association that is positive and linear. In contrast, there is a weak association that is positive and linear in graph III. The association between engine size and residual (from predicting FCR based on length) is stronger than the association between wheel base and residual (from predicting FCR based on length).
Jamal wants to predict FCR using length and one of the other variables, engine size or wheel base. Based on your response to part (c), which variable, engine size or wheel base, should Jamal use in addition to length if he wants to improve the prediction? Explain why you chose that variable.
Part (d):
Engine size is a better choice than wheel base for including with length in a regression model for predicting FCR. The stronger association between engine size and residual (from predicting FCR based on length) indicates that engine size is more useful than wheel base for reducing the variability in FCR values that remains unexplained (as indicated by residuals) after predicting FCR based on length.
Scoring
Parts (a), (b), (c), and (d) were scored as essentially correct (E), partially correct (P), or incorrect (I).
Part (a) is scored as follows:
Essentially correct (E) if the response provides the following two components:
A correct residual value with supporting calculation.
A correct interpretation of the residual value, in context.
Partially correct (P) if the response includes only one of the two components listed above.
Incorrect (I) if the response does not meet the criteria for E or P.
Notes:
- If the residual value is incorrect, the interpretation should be considered correct if it follows from the incorrect residual value.
- Correct interpretation of the residual must include the correct direction and magnitude of the FCR value away from the predicted FCR value.
- A calculated residual value which is slightly different from 0.96 due to the number of significant digits is acceptable.
Part (b) is scored as follows:
Essentially correct (E) if the response provides the following two components:
Circles the correct point in graph III.
Provides a reasonable interpretation of the car associated with point B having a residual near 0 that refers to predicting FCR based on length.
Partially correct (P) if the response correctly provides only one of the two components listed above.
Incorrect (I) if the response does not meet the criteria for E or P.
Note: A correct response for the second component must include reference to the observed FCR value of the car represented by point B, not the point B itself.
Part (c) is scored as follows:
Essentially correct (E) if the response correctly provides the following three components:
A description of form AND direction for both graphs.
A description of the strength of association for both graphs.
A comparison between the two graphs.
Partially correct (P) if the response correctly provides only two of the three components listed above.
Incorrect (I) if the response does not meet the criteria for E or P.
Notes:
- Part (c) is focused on the comparison of graph II and graph III. Inferences drawn from patterns in these graphs are considered in part (d).
- Linear is needed for form in graph II.
- Graph III may be described as having no association between wheel base and the residuals of FCR based on length, which is sufficient for describing the form, direction and strength of association of graph III.
Part (d) is scored as follows:
Essentially correct (E) if the response indicates the correct choice with a sound justification based on the following two components:
The strong(er) association.
Reducing the variability that remains unexplained in the model which predicts FCR based on length.
Partially correct (P) if the response indicates the correct choice and provides a justification based on only one of the two components which are listed above.
Incorrect (I) if the response indicates the incorrect choice;
OR
if the response indicates the correct choice but does not mention either of the two components which are listed above.
Note: Describing the variables in graph II and graph III as residuals is not required but can be used positively in holistic scoring. Incorrect descriptions of graph II or graph III or the variables in graphs are not acceptable.
Each essentially correct (E) part counts as 1 point. Each partially correct (P) part counts as 21 point.
Complete Response
Substantial Response
Developing Response
Minimal Response
If a response is between two scores (for example, 221 points), use a holistic approach to decide whether to score up or down, depending on the overall strength of the response and communication.