ConceptConceptDocsDocuments

AP Physics 1 6.3: Angular Momentum

Describe angular momentum about a chosen axis and relate it to rotational inertia, angular velocity, mass, speed, and position.

Syllabus
Effective Fall 2025
Course
AP Physics 1: Algebra-Based

6.3.A—Describe the angular momentum of an object or rigid system question 1

[Maximum number: 6]

(12 points, suggested time 25 minutes)
The left end of a rod of length d and rotational inertia I is attached to a frictionless horizontal surface by a frictionless pivot, as shown above. Point C marks the center (midpoint) of the rod. The rod is initially motionless but is free to rotate around the pivot. A student will slide a disk of mass mdisk m_{\text {disk }} toward the rod with velocity v0v_{0} perpendicular to the rod, and the disk will stick to the rod a distance x from the pivot. The student wants the rod

disk system to end up with as much angular speed as possible.

Question (a)

(a)

Suppose the rod is much more massive than the disk. To give the rod as much angular speed as possible, should the student make the disk hit the rod to the left of point C, at point C, or to the right of point C ? To the left of C At C To the right of C
Briefly explain your reasoning without manipulating equations.

[ 1 ]

Question (b)

(b)

On the Internet, a student finds the following equation for the postcollision angular speed ω\omega of the rod in this situation: ω=mdisk xv0I\omega=\frac{m_{\text {disk }} x v_{0}}{I}. Regardless of whether this equation for angular speed is correct, does it agree with your qualitative reasoning in part (a) ? In other words, does this equation for ω\omega have the expected dependence as reasoned in part (a) ? Yes No
Briefly explain your reasoning without deriving an equation for ω\omega.

[ 2 ]

Question (c)

(c)

Another student deriving an equation for the postcollision angular speed ω\omega of the rod makes a mistake and comes up with ω=Ixv0mdisk d4\omega=\frac{I x v_{0}}{m_{\text {disk }} d^{4}}. Without deriving the correct equation, how can you tell that this equation is not plausible-in other words, that it does not make physical sense? Briefly explain your reasoning.

For parts (d) and (e), do NOT assume that the rod is much more massive than the disk.

[ 3 ]
All question bank results loaded