7 Natural Selection

Syllabus
2025
Section
7
Level
—

7.1 Introduction to Natural Selection

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.1
Level
—

What Causes Natural Selection?

Natural selection is a major mechanism of evolution. It occurs when limited resources create competition and individuals with different heritable phenotypes do not survive and reproduce equally.

Limited resources → competition → some phenotypes perform better in that environment → their carriers are more likely to survive and produce offspring → those favorable traits are passed to more members of the next generation.

Survival matters because it can create an opportunity to reproduce, but reproduction is the step that transmits a favorable trait. Repeated differences in reproductive contribution allow a trait to become more common over generations.

Individuals do not evolve because they compete or try to adapt. Natural selection sorts existing heritable variation through unequal survival and reproduction; the population changes across generations.

How Natural Selection Changes Populations

Evolutionary fitness is measured by reproductive success: the contribution of an individual's heritable traits to later generations. Natural selection affects a population when individuals with some genetic variations leave more offspring than others.

Environmental condition → unequal reproductive success among variants → different contributions to the next generation → change in trait or allele frequencies in the population.

Environmental change Selection consequence
A biotic factor changes, such as competitors or pathogens A different phenotype may gain higher reproductive success
An abiotic factor changes, such as temperature or water availability The strength or direction of selection may change
Conditions fluctuate between generations Different genetic variations may be favored at different times

Fitness does not mean strongest, longest-lived, or healthiest in every setting. It is environment-dependent reproductive success, and the evolutionary result is measured at the population level across generations.

7.2 Natural Selection

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.2
Level
—

Why Phenotypic Variation Matters for Selection

Natural selection acts on phenotypic variation: observable or functional differences among individuals in a population. Without relevant variation, a selective pressure cannot favor one phenotype over another.

Population contains phenotypic variants → the environment applies a selective pressure → variants differ in survival or reproduction → fitness differs → the population's trait frequencies can change across generations.

Environments change, so a phenotype that increases fitness under one set of biotic or abiotic conditions may have no advantage—or may decrease fitness—under another. Variation therefore gives a population multiple possible responses to changing pressures.

Natural selection acts directly on phenotypes, not on a hidden genotype in isolation. It does not make every difference adaptive; only variations that affect survival or reproductive success in the current environment influence fitness.

From Molecular Variation to Organism Fitness

Variation in the type or number of molecules inside cells can change how cells function. Those functional differences can alter an organism's ability to survive and reproduce in a particular environment.

Molecular type or amount differs → cellular process changes → organism performance or phenotype changes → survival or reproduction changes under specific conditions → fitness differs.

Consider enzyme variants that function differently at different temperatures. If one variant maintains a needed cellular reaction more effectively under the current temperature, organisms carrying it may perform and reproduce better. If temperature changes, the relative advantage can also change.

A population containing different molecular variants is more likely to include individuals whose cellular machinery functions well under a range of environments, increasing the population's capacity to survive and reproduce when conditions differ.

More of a molecule is not automatically better, and one molecular type is not universally superior. Fitness depends on the molecule's effect on function in the particular environment.

7.3 Artificial Selection

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.3
Level
—

How Artificial Selection Changes Population Variation

Artificial selection occurs when humans choose which individuals reproduce based on a desired heritable phenotype. This choice changes which variants are passed to the next generation.

Population contains heritable variation → humans select breeders with a preferred phenotype → those individuals contribute more offspring → the associated variation becomes more common across generations.

For example, if humans repeatedly breed only plants with a heritable early-flowering phenotype, early flowering can become more common in later generations while alternative flowering-time variants become less represented.

Artificial selection therefore changes diversity within a population by shifting the relative representation of variants. When breeding is restricted to a narrow subset, variation not chosen by humans may decline.

Humans do not cause an individual to acquire the desired inherited trait through use or training. They alter population variation by controlling differential reproduction over generations.

7.4 Population Genetics

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.4
Level
—

Random Processes That Change Population Genetics

Population genetic makeup can change through random or nonselective processes. These processes alter which alleles exist or how common they are without necessarily favoring a phenotype because it improves fitness.

Process What happens Genetic effect
Mutation A random DNA change occurs Adds new genetic variation
Genetic drift Chance events alter allele representation, especially in small populations Allele frequencies change nonselectively
Bottleneck effect Population size falls to very few individuals for at least one generation Surviving alleles may not represent the original population
Founder effect A small separated group establishes a population Frequencies reflect the founders' alleles and traits
Migration and gene flow Individuals or alleles move between populations Alleles are added to or removed from a population

In drift, bottlenecks, and founder events, which alleles become common can depend on who survives or establishes the population by chance. The outcome can therefore differ from what natural selection alone would predict.

Random does not mean that allele frequencies stay unchanged or that every outcome is equally likely. It means the change is not caused by consistent selection for a higher-fitness phenotype.

How Random Processes Shape Population Divergence

Random processes change allele frequencies and therefore influence whether populations remain genetically similar or diverge from one another.

Process Role in population evolution Expected effect on divergence
Mutation Creates new genetic variation and possible phenotypes Supplies differences on which selection can later act
Genetic drift Changes allele frequencies by chance, strongly in small populations Can make a small population diverge from others of the same species
Gene flow Transfers alleles between populations Makes populations more genetically connected and counteracts divergence

Two isolated small populations can experience different chance frequency shifts, so drift can increase their genetic difference. If migration resumes, transferred alleles make their gene pools more similar, which can prevent divergence into separate species.

Mutation creates variation but does not by itself select the useful variants. Gene flow can add variation within a receiving population while simultaneously reducing genetic differences between populations.

Allele-Frequency Change Is Evidence of Evolution

A population evolves when its allele frequencies change over time. An allele frequency is the proportion of all copies of a gene in the population represented by a particular allele.

Measure the same population at different generations → compare the frequency of the same allele → a reproducible difference shows that the population's genetic makeup changed → this is evidence that evolution occurred.

Mutation, selection, genetic drift, and gene flow can all contribute to frequency change. The defining evidence is the population-level change across time, regardless of which mechanism produced it.

A new mutation in one individual is a source of variation, but population evolution is demonstrated only when the frequency of alleles in the population changes across generations.

7.5 Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.5
Level
—

Using Hardy–Weinberg as a Null Model

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium predicts allele and genotype frequencies in a non-evolving population. Its conditions are an idealized null hypothesis: a reference against which observed population frequencies can be compared.

Equilibrium condition If the condition is violated
Large population Genetic drift can change allele frequencies
No migration Gene flow can add or remove alleles
No new mutations Mutation can introduce new variation
Random mating Genotype proportions can depart from random-mating expectations
No natural selection Differential reproductive success can change allele frequencies

p+q=1$p$ = frequency of allele 1; $q$ = frequency of allele 2.

p^2+2pq+q^2=1$p^2$ = expected frequency of allele-1 homozygotes; $2pq$ = expected heterozygote frequency; $q^2$ = expected frequency of allele-2 homozygotes.

Worked example for a hypothetical equilibrium population: if p = 0.70, then q = 1 − 0.70 = 0.30. Expected genotype frequencies are p² = (0.70)² = 0.49, 2pq = 2(0.70)(0.30) = 0.42, and q² = (0.30)² = 0.09. Check: 0.49 + 0.42 + 0.09 = 1.00. These are unitless proportions, equivalent to 49%, 42%, and 9%.

The equations produce expected frequencies only when Hardy–Weinberg conditions apply. A difference between observed and expected genotype frequencies does not identify the cause by itself; it shows that the equilibrium model or its assumptions should be investigated.

7.6 Evidence of Evolution

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.6
Level
—

Five Complementary Sources of Evolutionary Evidence

Evolution is supported by scientific evidence from multiple disciplines. Each data type records a different feature of life or Earth history, and compatible patterns across disciplines strengthen the evolutionary explanation.

Data type Example of what is observed or measured Evolutionary contribution
Geographical Where organisms or fossils occur Links distribution patterns to population history
Geological Fossils, rock layers, and ages Places biological forms in a time sequence
Physical Organismal structures and measurable traits Reveals structural similarities, differences, and change
Biochemical DNA, proteins, and other molecular features Reveals inherited molecular similarities and differences
Mathematical Quantified patterns and statistical comparisons Tests whether observed patterns fit or depart from stated expectations

A geographical pattern alone may have several explanations. When it agrees with fossil chronology, structural homology, molecular similarity, and quantitative analysis, the combined evidence supports a more coherent history of descent and change.

Data are observations or measurements; common ancestry and evolutionary change are inferences supported by those data. One data type need not answer every evolutionary question.

How Fossils, Structures, and Molecules Reveal Evolution

Evidence from extant and extinct organisms supports evolution when dated or comparable features reveal a consistent pattern of biological change and inherited similarity over time.

Evidence Observation Evolutionary reasoning
Fossils and geology Fossils occur in rocks of different ages and places Dating by rock age, isotope decay including carbon-14, and geographical context orders organisms through time
Morphological homology Organisms share underlying structural patterns Shared structures, including vestigial structures, support inheritance from common ancestors
DNA and protein sequences Nucleotide or amino-acid sequences can be compared Patterns of molecular similarity and difference support evolutionary relationships and common ancestry

Fossil sequences document extinct as well as living forms, while homologies and molecular sequences connect those forms through shared features. Agreement among chronology, morphology, and molecules is stronger than relying on appearance alone.

A similar-looking feature is not automatically a homology, and greater molecular similarity is evidence of a closer relationship only when comparisons are made appropriately. Evidence supports an evolutionary model; it is not a claim that living species descended directly from other living species.

7.7 Common Ancestry

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.7
Level
—

Shared Eukaryotic Features Support Common Ancestry

All eukaryotes share fundamental cellular and molecular features. Their widespread presence across very different eukaryotic lineages supports the inference that the features were inherited from common ancestors.

Shared evidence Level and role Why it supports common ancestry
Membrane-bound organelles Cellular structures organize functions into internal compartments A shared basic cellular organization is consistent with inheritance from ancestral eukaryotes
Linear chromosomes Cellular structures organize genetic information into linear DNA molecules Shared chromosome architecture links diverse eukaryotic lineages
Genes containing introns Molecular organization places noncoding regions within genes Shared gene architecture is consistent with inherited molecular history

Observe the same foundational feature across eukaryotes → establish that it is cellular or molecular and heritable → compare its organization across lineages → infer that common ancestry is a coherent explanation for the shared pattern.

These features support common ancestry; they do not imply that all eukaryotes are identical or that any one modern eukaryote is the ancestor of all others. Descendant lineages can retain shared foundations while evolving many differences.

7.8 Continuing Evolution

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.8
Level
—

Why Evolution Is Still Happening

All species have evolved and continue to evolve. Heritable variation persists or arises, environments keep changing, and variants differ in reproductive success, so the genetic makeup of populations can keep changing across generations.

Ongoing-evolution evidence What the change shows
Genomic changes over time Population DNA changes can be tracked across generations
Continuous change in the fossil record Organismal forms have continued to change through Earth history
Resistance to antibiotics, pesticides, herbicides, or chemotherapy drugs Treatment creates selection pressure that changes the representation of resistant variants
Pathogens causing emergent diseases Pathogen populations evolve traits that can alter transmission, host interaction, or disease patterns

A population contains variation → a drug or pesticide removes more susceptible individuals → resistant variants survive and reproduce more successfully → resistance-associated variation becomes more common in later generations.

These examples occur at different time scales, but each records the same defining feature: inherited population characteristics are not fixed. Past fossil transitions and present genomic or resistance changes are parts of one continuing evolutionary process.

Antibiotics or pesticides do not cause organisms to make a useful mutation because they need it. The treatment is a selective pressure; it increases the relative success of variants that can already survive under that condition.

7.9 Phylogeny

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.9
Level
—

Evidence Used to Build Phylogenetic Hypotheses

Phylogenetic trees and cladograms are testable hypotheses about evolutionary relationships among lineages. They are constructed by comparing informative character changes and molecular or morphological evidence.

Evidence or tool How it informs the hypothesis
Shared derived character A gained or lost trait shared by multiple lineages supports common ancestry
Outgroup The least closely related comparison lineage helps identify which character states are derived
Morphological traits Compare structures in living or fossil organisms
DNA or protein sequences Compare molecular similarity; these data are typically more accurate and reliable than morphology alone
Fossils or molecular clock Calibrate amount of change over time in a phylogenetic tree
Model What it shows What it does not necessarily show
Phylogenetic tree Hypothesized relationships and an amount of change over time when calibrated Certainty that the hypothesis is final
Cladogram Branching order based on shared derived characters Time scale or amount of evolutionary difference between groups

A shared trait is informative only when its evolutionary origin is interpreted correctly. Overall appearance can mislead, which is why molecular evidence and multiple independent characters are valuable.

Reading Relatedness from Branching Patterns

Evolutionary relatedness is inferred from branching ancestry. A node represents the most recent common ancestor of the lineages that descend from that branch point.

Choose two lineages → trace each branch backward → find their first shared node → compare that node with the shared nodes of other pairs. The pair whose common node is more recent is inferred to be more closely related.

If lineages A and B meet at one recent node, while lineage C joins their branch at an earlier node, A and B are more closely related to each other than either is to C. Moving or rotating the tips around a node does not change that ancestry.

Branching hypotheses can be constructed from morphology in living or fossil species and from DNA or protein sequence similarities. The branches can illustrate speciation events that produced distinct lineages.

Tip order, horizontal closeness, or one lineage's position at the top does not determine relatedness. Trees and cladograms are hypotheses, so new evidence can change the preferred branching pattern.

7.10 Speciation

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.10
Level
—

When Populations Become Separate Species

Speciation occurs when two populations become reproductively isolated: they no longer exchange genetic information through successful interbreeding. With gene flow interrupted, the populations can continue to diverge independently.

For sexually reproducing organisms, the biological species concept asks whether individuals can interbreed and produce offspring that are both viable and fertile. If they can, they belong to the same species under this concept; if reproductive isolation prevents that exchange, they may form separate species.

Two populations may look different yet remain one species if they still exchange genes through viable, fertile offspring. Conversely, mating that produces no surviving offspring or only sterile offspring does not maintain gene flow between the populations.

Physical separation alone is not the definition of a new species. The decisive condition is reproductive isolation, and the biological species concept is specifically framed for sexually reproducing organisms.

Rates and Patterns of Evolutionary Change

Evolution and speciation do not proceed at one constant rate. Ecological conditions can be associated with long periods of little change, steady accumulation of change, rapid diversification, or similar adaptations in separate lineages.

Rate model Pattern through time
Punctuated equilibrium Long periods of stasis are interrupted by relatively rapid evolutionary change
Gradualism Evolutionary change accumulates slowly over hundreds of thousands or millions of years
Pattern Ecological condition and outcome
Divergent evolution Adaptation to different or newly available habitats produces increasing phenotypic differences
Adaptive radiation Many newly available habitats can support especially rapid diversification and speciation
Convergent evolution Similar selective pressures lead different populations or species to evolve similar phenotypic adaptations

For example, access to several distinct habitats can expose populations to different selective pressures, promoting divergent adaptation and rapid adaptive radiation. By contrast, similar environments can favor similar solutions in separate lineages, producing convergence.

Similar traits produced by convergent evolution do not by themselves show that the species are closely related. Convergence describes a similar response to similar selective pressures, not shared recent ancestry.

How Reproductive Isolation Drives Speciation

Speciation is driven when barriers prevent gene flow and maintain reproductive isolation. The populations then evolve independently because alleles are no longer regularly exchanged between them.

Speciation context Population relationship How isolation can persist
Allopatric Populations are geographically isolated A physical separation prevents regular interbreeding and gene flow
Sympatric Populations overlap geographically Reproductive barriers separate groups even though they occupy the same general area
Barrier type When it acts Examples of the outcome
Prezygotic Before a zygote forms Habitat, temporal, behavioral, mechanical, or gametic isolation prevents mating or fertilization
Postzygotic After fertilization Hybrid offspring have reduced viability or are sterile, so they do not sustain gene flow

Barrier reduces successful interbreeding → gene flow falls → populations remain reproductively isolated → independent evolutionary change can accumulate → separate species may arise.

Sympatric does not mean that no isolation exists; it means the isolation is not geographic. Allopatric describes geographic separation, but speciation requires reproductive isolation to be established or maintained.

7.11 Variations in Populations

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.11
Level
—

Genetic Diversity as Population Resilience

Genetic diversity is the variety of alleles within a population. Greater diversity increases the chance that, when the environment changes, some individuals already carry variants that help them withstand the new pressure and reproduce.

Population Response to an environmental perturbation Likely population consequence
High genetic diversity Some individuals are more likely to carry alleles that improve survival or reproduction under the new condition The population is more resilient and more likely to persist
Low genetic diversity Individuals are more genetically similar, so one pressure may affect a large fraction in the same way Decline or extinction risk is higher

During a disease outbreak, a genetically diverse population is more likely to include some less-susceptible individuals. If those individuals survive and reproduce, their alleles become better represented in later generations, helping the population recover.

Allele effect depends on environment: an allele that improves survival under one pressure can be neutral or deleterious under another because the selective pressures differ. Diversity therefore supplies options; it does not guarantee that every variant is useful in every condition.

A population does not create a needed allele in response to a crisis, and every individual does not become more resistant. Resilience comes from preexisting genetic differences and the resulting change in which individuals leave offspring.

7.12 Origins of Life on Earth

Syllabus
2025
Topic
7.12
Level
—

Evidence Constraining the Origin of Life

Models for the origin of life are constrained by scientific evidence rather than by direct observation of the event. Geological dates bound when life could have begun, while fossils, experiments, and RNA properties test whether proposed steps are plausible.

Approximate date Evidence-based interpretation
4.6 billion years ago (bya) Earth formed
Until about 3.9 bya Conditions were too hostile for life
3.5 bya Earliest fossil evidence for life

Taken together, these dates place the plausible origin of life after conditions became suitable at about 3.9 bya and no later than the earliest known fossil evidence at 3.5 bya. The fossil date is evidence that life already existed, not necessarily the exact moment it began.

The RNA-world hypothesis proposes that RNA could have been the earliest genetic material. Its model requires RNA replication to maintain genetic continuity, complementary base pairing to support copying, and catalysis without genetically encoded proteins. Catalytic RNA makes that combined information-and-catalysis role scientifically plausible.

Experiments that model proposed early-Earth conditions can test whether organic molecules form spontaneously under those conditions. Results can support, weaken, or revise a model as assumptions about the early atmosphere change.

A successful laboratory step or an RNA property supports part of an origin model; it does not prove that one complete pathway occurred exactly that way on early Earth. Scientific models remain revisable as new evidence appears.