Specialist Option 1: Clinical Psychology
- Syllabus
- 9990–2028–2029
- Section
- —
- Level
- A2

Published Concept pages under this syllabus area do not have tagged past-paper appearances in the selected level yet.
Recent 5 years
Topic —
Specialist Option 1: Clinical Psychology.
This matters because clinical psychology overview determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply clinical psychology overview to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: Clinical Psychology overview is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Key studies for Clinical Psychology.
This matters because clinical psychology key studies determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply clinical psychology key studies to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: Clinical Psychology key studies is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
For each key study, candidates should know, understand and evaluate.
This matters because clinical psychology key-study requirements determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply clinical psychology key-study requirements to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: Clinical Psychology key-study requirements is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Topic 1.1
1.1.1 Diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia.
This matters because —diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.1.2 Explanations of schizophrenia.
This matters because —explanations of schizophrenia determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —explanations of schizophrenia to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Explanations of schizophrenia is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.1.3 Treatment and management of schizophrenia.
This matters because —treatment and management of schizophrenia determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —treatment and management of schizophrenia to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Treatment and management of schizophrenia is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Topic 1.2
1.2.1 Diagnostic criteria for mood (affective) disorders.
This matters because —mood disorder criteria determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —mood disorder criteria to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Mood disorder criteria is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.2.2 Explanations of mood (affective) disorders: depressive disorder (unipolar).
This matters because —mood disorder explanations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —mood disorder explanations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Mood disorder explanations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.2.3 Treatment and management of mood (affective) disorders.
This matters because —mood disorder treatments determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —mood disorder treatments to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Mood disorder treatments is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Topic 1.3
1.3.1 Diagnostic criteria for impulse control disorders.
This matters because —criteria for impulse control disorders determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —criteria for impulse control disorders to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Criteria for impulse control disorders is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.3.2 Explanations of impulse control disorders.
This matters because —explanations of impulse control disorders determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —explanations of impulse control disorders to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Explanations of impulse control disorders is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.3.3 Treatment and management of impulse control disorders.
This matters because —treatment of impulse control disorders determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —treatment of impulse control disorders to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Treatment of impulse control disorders is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Topic 1.4
1.4.1 Diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders and fear-related disorders.
This matters because —anxiety criteria determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —anxiety criteria to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Anxiety criteria is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.4.2 Explanations of fear-related disorders.
This matters because —fear-related explanations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —fear-related explanations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Fear-related explanations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.4.3 Treatment and management of anxiety disorders and fear-related disorders.
This matters because —anxiety treatments determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —anxiety treatments to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —Anxiety treatments is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Topic 1.5
1.5.1 Diagnostic criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
This matters because —ocd criteria determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —ocd criteria to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —OCD criteria is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.5.2 Explanations of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
This matters because —ocd explanations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —ocd explanations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —OCD explanations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
1.5.3 Treatment and management of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
This matters because —ocd treatments determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply —ocd treatments to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: —OCD treatments is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.