2. Human resource management

Syllabus
9609–2026–2027
Section
2
Level
AS

2.1 Human resource management (HRM)

Syllabus
9609–2026–2027
Topic
2.1
Level
AS

HRM aligns people, capability and organisational goals

Human resource management plans, recruits, develops, rewards and supports people so the organisation has the capability to achieve its objectives.

HR decisions affect cost, productivity, skills, morale and legal risk. HRM is therefore a strategic function, not only an administrative payroll task.

If a firm plans a new digital service, HRM may forecast skills, recruit or train staff and redesign roles before launch.

A “people-first” policy is not automatically effective; its value depends on fit with work, resources and objectives.

Workforce planning closes capability gaps; turnover is a signal

Workforce planning forecasts the number and skills of employees needed, audits the current workforce, identifies gaps, chooses actions and reviews results. Demand, technology, expansion, seasonality, labour supply, budgets and employee departures can change the plan; responses include recruitment, training, redeployment, flexible contracts, retention or job redesign.

Labour turnover (%)=employees leaving during the periodaverage number employed during the period×100\text{Labour turnover (\%)}=\frac{\text{employees leaving during the period}}{\text{average number employed during the period}}\times100

If 18 employees leave and the average workforce is 90, labour turnover = 18 ÷ 90 × 100 = 20%. Compare the same period and similar roles or divisions before diagnosing the cause.

Pattern Possible benefit Possible cost/risk
High turnover Removes poor fit; brings new ideas/skills; may lower senior wage cost Recruitment/training cost, lost experience, disruption, weaker quality/service and morale
Low turnover Retains skills, relationships and culture; lowers replacement cost Stale ideas, blocked promotion, high senior wages, skill mismatch or retained poor performers

A turnover rate is not a verdict. Interpret who left, why, replacement difficulty, business growth, industry norms and short- versus long-run consequences.

Recruitment attracts candidates; selection tests job fit

Recruitment attracts a suitable pool; selection chooses against job-related criteria. A defensible pipeline is: identify vacancy → write job description and person specification → choose internal/external channel → advertise → receive applications/CVs or résumés → shortlist → assess → check references → offer and agree an employment contract.

Item Main purpose
Job description Duties, responsibilities, reporting, hours/location and role conditions
Person specification Required or desirable skills, qualifications, experience and attributes
Employment contract Agreed terms such as job, pay, hours, benefits, notice, duties and rights
Route Strength Limitation
Internal Faster/cheaper; known performance; motivates promotion Smaller pool; creates another vacancy; fewer new ideas
External advertisement/online Wide, fast reach and searchable applications High volume/poor fit; platform and screening cost
Agency Specialist pool and screening support Fee and less direct control/knowledge
Method Evidence supplied Main caution
Application/CV or résumé History, qualifications and written claims Self-reported and inconsistently presented
Structured interview Comparable responses, communication and motivation Bias/rehearsal; weak predictor alone
Test/work sample Knowledge, aptitude, personality or actual task skill Must be relevant, valid and fair
Assessment centre Several exercises/observers reveal behaviour and teamwork Expensive and time-consuming
References Past role/conduct confirmation May be brief, selective or restricted

Use more than one relevant source of evidence, apply the same criteria fairly, protect equality and diversity, and weigh quality of hire, speed and cost. A larger applicant pool or a confident interview does not guarantee performance.

Redundancy removes a role; dismissal ends an individual's employment

Route Meaning Choice and basis
Voluntary redundancy The role is no longer needed and employees are invited to agree to leave, usually with a package Employee chooses whether to accept; may reduce conflict but the business can lose valued skills
Involuntary redundancy Employer selects employees because their jobs are no longer required Employee has no choice; selection criteria and procedure should be objective and lawful
Fair dismissal Employer terminates an individual for a valid reason such as misconduct or capability, using a fair procedure Evidence, warnings/hearing where appropriate, consistency and right to respond matter
Unfair dismissal Termination lacks a valid reason or fair/legal procedure Can cause claims, compensation, reputation damage and lower morale

Ask first: has the job disappeared, or is the issue the employee's conduct/capability? Automation may make a good worker's role redundant; repeated unsafe conduct after a fair process may justify dismissal. Both choices can affect cost, skills, morale, workload and employer reputation.

Redundancy is not a label for removing an unwanted person. Dismissal is not automatically fair merely because the employer states a reason; the reason and procedure must withstand scrutiny in the relevant legal context.

Morale and welfare connect fairness, wellbeing and performance

Employee morale is the level of satisfaction, enthusiasm, confidence and commitment felt toward work. Welfare protects physical and emotional wellbeing through safe conditions, reasonable support and access to help. Work-life balance is a sustainable allocation of time and energy between work and life outside work.

HRM influences morale and welfare through workload and shifts, pay and fairness, leadership and voice, safety, counselling/support, leave and flexibility. Better fit can reduce stress, absence, errors and labour turnover → preserve skills and service quality → lower replacement cost and strengthen productivity/reputation. Provision costs money and may be difficult in some operating contexts, so diagnose the binding problem.

Concept Meaning Possible business impact
Diversity A mixed workforce whose differences and perspectives are positively valued Wider labour pool, skills, ideas, customer insight and reputation; may require inclusive culture/training
Equality Fair opportunity and treatment without unjust discrimination Motivation, retention, legal-risk control and access to best applicants; change may create short-run cost

Long evening and weekend hours may tire specialist engineers → more mistakes and longer lead times → damaged quality/reputation and higher turnover. Redesigning schedules can help, but staffing cost, customer demand and employee preferences determine feasibility.

A wellness perk does not prove healthy work, diversity does not guarantee inclusion, and equality is not blindly treating unlike needs identically. Judge short- and long-run effects in the business context.

Training closes current gaps; development builds future flexibility and innovation

Type What it is Strength Limitation
Induction Introduction for new employees to people, role, culture, systems, safety and terms Faster settling, fewer mistakes, confidence and retention Uses time/cost and may overload new starters
On-the-job Learning at work while doing/shadowing/coaching/rotating Relevant, lower direct cost, productive output and colleague knowledge Trainer quality varies; errors/disruption and inherited bad habits
Off-the-job Learning away from the normal workplace, e.g. specialist course Expert input, focus, safe practice and possible qualification/new ideas Fees, travel/time and lost output; transfer may be weak

Effective training can improve skill, consistency, quality, safety, productivity, customer service, motivation and retention → raise revenue or lower waste, absence, turnover and unit cost. Against this, include fees, trainer time, lost output and the risk that trained staff leave. Evaluate by performance transfer, not course completion.

Development aim HRM actions Business effect
Intrapreneurship Give skills, autonomy, time/resources, cross-functional teams, leadership opportunities and rewards for ideas More experimentation, process/product innovation and possible competitive advantage; includes project cost/risk
Multi-skilling and flexibility Cross-train, rotate/enlarge/enrich jobs, map skill gaps and reward new skills Employees cover tasks/absence/demand changes, improve teamwork and redeployment; may raise workload/pay expectations

Choose the method by learner, task risk, specificity, scale, urgency, cost and need for external expertise. Training improves current capability; development is broader and future-facing, though they can overlap.

Cooperation and collective bargaining reshape workplace outcomes

Cooperation means management and employees share information, consult, negotiate and work toward compatible goals. Trust and credible voice can improve ideas, safety, quality, productivity, morale and retention while reducing conflict and management time; management gains smoother change and employees gain influence, clarity and fairer treatment. Training, consultation time and compromise can add cost.

A trade union represents members' employment interests. Collective bargaining is negotiation between employer representatives and employee/union representatives over collective terms such as pay, hours, safety, welfare, job security and procedures.

Stakeholder Possible benefits Possible costs/risks
Employees Greater bargaining power, pay/conditions, safety, information, support, job security and decision voice Membership fees, lost pay during action, conflict or possible victimisation
Employer One communication/negotiation channel, stable agreements, better coordination, morale and retention Higher wages/welfare cost, slower decisions, restrictive agreements or industrial action/lost output

Issue → representatives gather member/management evidence → collective negotiation and trade-offs → agreement and implementation, or unresolved dispute/industrial action. For a shift change, consultation and compensation may protect continuity; imposition can trigger resistance, absenteeism, work-to-rule or strike, reducing output and revenue.

Good relations do not mean no disagreement, and unions do not only cause strikes. Judge union density, trust, legal setting, urgency, alternatives, affordability and whether long-run cooperation outweighs short-run concessions or disruption.

2.2 Motivation

Syllabus
9609–2026–2027
Topic
2.2
Level
AS

Motivation links effort to needs, rewards and work design

Motivation is the willingness to direct effort toward work. It is shaped by intrinsic factors such as achievement and responsibility and extrinsic factors such as pay, recognition and security.

A reward changes behaviour only if employees value it, believe performance can earn it and see the process as fair. Different people respond to different combinations.

A sales bonus may increase effort when targets are controllable, but can damage teamwork if staff compete for an unfairly allocated reward.

Motivation is not identical to satisfaction or productivity; an enthusiastic worker may still lack training or resources.

Work can satisfy or frustrate different human needs

A human need is a basic requirement or valued psychological state an individual seeks to satisfy. At work, needs can involve income and physical conditions, safety/security, belonging, esteem/recognition and growth, challenge or fulfilment.

Need How work may satisfy it Why it may remain unsatisfied
Physical/material Sufficient pay, breaks, canteen/toilets and comfortable conditions Low pay, excessive hours or poor facilities
Safety/security Contract, stable job, clear authority and safe systems Zero/short hours, unsafe work, recession or weak protection
Belonging Teams, communication and inclusion Isolation, exclusion, conflict or discriminatory culture
Esteem/status Recognition, responsibility, promotion and fair treatment No acknowledgement, unfairness or blocked progression
Growth/fulfilment Challenge, creativity, development and autonomy Repetitive work, strict control or no learning opportunity

The same practice can matter differently by experience, role, life stage and ambition. A carer may value flexible hours; a developer may value challenge; a low-paid worker may prioritise reliable income. Business finance, job design, leadership and objectives limit what can be offered.

Needs models identify possibilities, not a rigid universal sequence. Ask which need is salient, what workplace evidence shows, and whether the proposed action genuinely addresses the barrier.

Six motivation theories diagnose different causes of effort

Theory Core idea Management implication and caution
Taylor Economic reward and scientific task design can raise output; workers are treated mainly as rational economic people Standardise work and link pay to output, e.g. piece rate; may ignore social/intrinsic needs and encourage quantity over quality
Mayo Social relations, attention, communication and group belonging affect motivation Use teams, consultation and supportive supervision; group norms can also restrict output
Maslow Physiological, safety, social, esteem and self-actualisation needs may become salient Diagnose the unmet need and match pay/security/team/recognition/challenge; order and responses are not universal
Herzberg Hygiene factors prevent dissatisfaction; motivators create satisfaction Fix pay, policy, conditions and security, then enrich jobs with achievement, recognition, responsibility and growth; categories can overlap
McClelland People differ in learned needs for achievement, power and affiliation Give realistic challenge/feedback, influence/leadership or teamwork; needs mix varies and can be difficult to measure
Vroom Motivation depends on expectancy (effort→performance), instrumentality (performance→reward) and valence (reward value) Make targets achievable, links credible and rewards valued/fair; if any link is near zero, incentive effect collapses

Diagnose evidence before choosing a lens: repetitive isolated work may suggest Herzberg/Mayo; unreachable targets or broken promises suggest Vroom; a creative software employee may need McClelland achievement or Maslow self-actualisation. Then propose an action, trace its effect and test cost, fairness, task and employee differences.

Content theories ask what needs or factors motivate; Vroom is a process theory explaining how expectations produce effort. Naming a theorist is not analysis, and no theory is best for every worker.

Motivation methods must fit the measure, work and employee

Payment method Basis Main incentive and risk
Time based Amount per hour Income tracks hours; may not reward output
Salary Fixed annual amount, usually monthly Security/status; weak direct output link
Piece rate Amount per item produced Raises quantity; quality/safety/teamwork may suffer
Commission Amount or percentage of sales Raises selling effort; aggressive selling, volatility and revenue-not-profit focus
Bonus Extra payment for a target/event Focuses effort; target gaming or unfairness
Profit sharing Employees receive a share of business profit Aligns with total success; individual effort link may feel weak and profit varies
Performance-related pay Pay linked to assessed agreed criteria Rewards contribution; measurement, bias, stress and administration issues
Fringe benefits Non-cash financial-value perks, e.g. insurance/car/discount Retention/status; cost and unequal value to employees

Commission example: weekly salary 250forfourweeks=250 for four weeks =1,000; direct sales 10,500at510,500 at 5% =525; total February payment = $1,525. Always identify whether commission is additional to basic pay and whether it is based on sales value, volume or another measure.

Non-financial method Mechanism Caution
Training/development/promotion/status Skill, growth, recognition and career path Cost; opportunity may be limited or staff may leave
Job rotation/enlargement/redesign Variety or wider tasks Wider is not necessarily deeper; training/disruption
Job enrichment More challenge, complexity, responsibility and achievement Stress or errors without capability/resources
Team working Belonging, support and shared problem-solving Conflict, free-riding or restrictive norms
Empowerment More authority/control over work Poor decisions, stress or loss of management control
Participation Voice and influence over decisions Slower decisions and managers may ignore input

Participation can use meetings/consultation, quality circles, works councils, worker directors, autonomous work groups, democratic leadership or employee share ownership. The degree of influence differs: giving information is weaker than voting, board representation or control over task decisions.

Apply theory and context: worker needs, measurability, fairness, skill, trust, cost, job role, business objective and short-/long-run side effects. Financial methods are not universally motivating; non-financial methods are not automatically free or effective.

2.3 Management

Syllabus
9609–2026–2027
Topic
2.3
Level
AS

Managers combine functions, roles, styles and assumptions to deliver performance

Traditional function Management work
Planning Set objectives, forecast and choose actions/resources/timing
Organising Arrange tasks, people, authority and other resources
Directing Lead, communicate and motivate action toward objectives
Controlling Set standards, measure actual performance, compare and correct
Lens Main roles What it adds
Fayol Planning, organising, commanding/directing, coordinating and controlling A functional cycle for turning objectives into organised action and correction
Mintzberg interpersonal Figurehead, leader, liaison Relationships, representation and motivation
Mintzberg informational Monitor, disseminator, spokesperson Gather, share and communicate information
Mintzberg decisional Entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator, negotiator Change, crisis response, priorities and bargaining
Style Decision/authority pattern Likely strength Likely limitation / suitable condition
Autocratic Manager decides and closely directs Fast, clear, useful in crisis/inexperience/high risk Low voice/trust, stress, weak creativity and morale
Democratic Employees contribute before decisions Better information, ownership, motivation and retention Slower; conflict or diluted accountability; useful with experienced staff
Laissez-faire Skilled employees receive wide autonomy Creativity, speed near expertise and ownership Drift, inconsistent standards or poor coordination without capable teams
Paternalistic Manager decides while seeking employees' welfare, like a parent Security, loyalty and coordinated direction Dependency, limited genuine voice and manager may misjudge needs
Assumption Manager response Conditional consequence
Theory X: employees may dislike work, avoid responsibility and need external control/reward Close supervision, clear rules/targets and often autocratic direction Clarity can help new/inexperienced staff or crises and reduce decision stress; can create mistrust, low creativity and dependence
Theory Y: employees can find work natural, self-direct, seek responsibility and be creative when committed Participation, delegation, empowerment and development Can unlock ideas and intrinsic motivation; fails if capability, information, desire or controls are insufficient

Managers contribute by setting direction, designing structures/processes, allocating scarce resources, recruiting/developing people, creating culture, coordinating specialists, controlling finance/quality and communicating with stakeholders. These can improve productivity, service, customer/patient satisfaction, cost control, innovation and sustainability—or damage them when decisions are bureaucratic, uninformed or incompetent.

No style or assumption is universally best. Judge urgency, risk, workforce skill/experience, task complexity, information location, organisational culture and need for consistency or creativity. In a hospital, managers and medical specialists are interdependent: resources and systems enable clinical expertise, while management without professional evidence can obstruct care.