19. Genetic Technology
- Syllabus
- 9700–2028–2029
- Section
- 19
- Level
- A2

Recombinant DNA is DNA made by combining nucleotide sequences from two or more different sources. The universal genetic code makes it possible for a sequence from one organism to be read in another organism, although the code itself does not guarantee successful expression.
Shared codon meanings allow genetic information to be transferred between species: a host can potentially use the transferred sequence to make the same type of polypeptide. Recombinant DNA is therefore the altered DNA construct, not the whole organism and not automatically a useful product.
Keep the levels separate: recombinant DNA describes the DNA molecule or construct; transgenic describes introduced DNA from another species; GMO describes an organism with introduced genetic material. This card establishes the concept and its expression/replication boundary only. Restriction enzymes, vectors, promoters, PCR, gel analysis, applications and risk evaluation are later learning jobs.
Genetic engineering deliberately modifies an organism by transferring genetic material so that a chosen characteristic can be produced. The transferred sequence becomes recombinant DNA in the host, but useful expression depends on the host being able to use the construct.
The workflow has linked dependencies: the desired sequence must be obtained, the construct must be joined and delivered, and the host must recognise the regulatory information and express the gene. Enzymes, vectors, markers and promoters each support a later part of this chain; they are tools within the workflow, not interchangeable names for genetic engineering.
Do not treat transfer of DNA as proof of expression or a useful product. This card gives the whole engineering arc only. Restriction endonucleases, reverse transcriptase, DNA polymerase, ligase, vectors, promoters, markers, PCR, gel analysis, microarrays and bioinformatics are separate learning jobs; their detailed mechanisms belong to the matching cards.
The desired gene can be obtained from donor genomic DNA, from donor mRNA as complementary DNA (cDNA), or by artificial synthesis. The best source depends on the sequence needed and whether non-coding introns must be excluded.
Use the source-selection method:
Genomic DNA — directly represents a donor chromosome, but may include introns and other non-coding DNA.
cDNA from mRNA — reflects a gene that was expressed in the donor cell and lacks introns present in the processed mRNA.
Artificial synthesis — uses known genetic information to design the sequence, without cutting it from an existing genome; it can avoid introns or unnecessary non-coding sections.
These are alternative ways to obtain the desired gene, not three different gene functions. The matched SME page does not provide a separate DNA-library workflow, sequence-orientation assay, PCR protocol, gel method, or promoter/vector/marker mechanism; those details remain in their later cards and are not invented here.
Gene transfer requires tools for obtaining, cutting, copying, joining and carrying DNA. Enzymes perform chemical reactions; a plasmid is a small circular DNA vector that carries the desired gene into a host cell and can replicate there.
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
| Restriction endonuclease | recognises a specific DNA sequence and cuts donor DNA and plasmid; using the same enzyme can create complementary sticky ends |
| Reverse transcriptase | uses processed donor mRNA as a template to make single-stranded cDNA without introns |
| DNA polymerase | adds complementary nucleotides to make the cDNA double stranded |
| DNA ligase | forms phosphodiester bonds in the sugar-phosphate backbone, sealing the gene into the plasmid |
| Plasmid | acts as a vector: accepts the gene, enters a host such as a bacterium, and is copied as the host/plasmid replicates |
For an mRNA-derived gene: reverse transcriptase makes cDNA → DNA polymerase makes the second strand. Cut the gene and plasmid with the same restriction endonuclease → complementary ends pair → DNA ligase seals the recombinant plasmid → transfer it into host cells.
Sticky-end base pairing uses hydrogen bonds, but ligase seals the backbone with phosphodiester bonds. A plasmid carries and replicates DNA; it does not cut or join it.
A promoter is a non-coding DNA sequence where transcription factors and RNA polymerase bind to start and control transcription of a nearby gene.
A desired gene taken from a donor may not include its promoter, or the donor promoter may not be recognised by the new host. Transferring a suitable promoter immediately upstream gives the host transcription machinery a binding and start region, so mRNA can be made and the gene can be expressed.
Promoter choice can control where, when and how strongly transcription occurs. A constitutive promoter can keep expression active, while a regulated promoter can respond to a condition or restrict expression to particular tissues when the construct and host support this.
The promoter is not translated and does not code for the desired protein. Transfer of a coding sequence without a host-recognised promoter may produce little or no transcription; the fluorescent marker used to check expression is taught separately.
A fluorescent marker gene codes for a protein that fluoresces under suitable light. When it is transferred alongside the gene of interest, its visible product can reveal which cells are expressing the introduced construct.
Fluorescence requires marker-gene transcription, translation and correctly formed fluorescent protein. It therefore provides a rapid, non-destructive expression signal and allows fluorescent cells or tissues to be located.
Fluorescence directly confirms expression of the marker and supports expression of the linked gene under shared control. It does not by itself prove the amount, folding or biological function of the desired protein.
Gene editing is genetic engineering that inserts, deletes or replaces DNA at a specific site in an organism's genome. Targeting the site allows a chosen sequence or regulatory region to be modified rather than relying on uncontrolled insertion.
| Edit | DNA change | Possible consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Insertion | one or more nucleotides or a DNA sequence are added at the target | can add information or alter reading/transcription control |
| Deletion | selected DNA is removed | can disrupt a sequence or remove a harmful section |
| Replacement | target DNA is exchanged for a chosen sequence | can correct a mutation or deliberately change codons/regulation |
Specific target recognition → DNA alteration at that site → changed nucleotide sequence → possible change in transcription or amino-acid sequence and therefore phenotype. The edited sequence must be checked, followed by evidence that the intended expression or function changed.
Gene editing does not always add foreign DNA: deletion or replacement can modify an organism's existing genome. Specific targeting reduces uncertainty about location but does not by itself prove every cell was edited or that the result functions as intended.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an in-vitro method for making many copies of a specific DNA target from a very small starting sample. Primers define which region is copied, while a thermostable DNA polymerase builds the new strands during repeated temperature cycles.
The reaction needs target DNA, forward and reverse primers, free nucleotides, a DNA polymerase, and a buffer. Primers are complementary to the ends of the target region, so they provide specificity and tell the polymerase where to begin. Taq polymerase is useful because it remains active after the high-temperature denaturation stage.
PCR amplifies the sequence between the primers, not every DNA molecule in the sample. Specificity therefore depends on primer binding and reaction conditions; a large signal is not automatically proof that the intended biological interpretation is correct. Contamination-control procedures are not specified on the matched SME page, so no extra protocol is invented here. Gel electrophoresis, microarrays and bioinformatics are separate cards.
Gel electrophoresis separates DNA fragments by their movement through a gel. DNA has a net negative charge because of its phosphate groups, so an electric field drives it towards the positive electrode; fragment size also affects how far it moves through the gel pores.
Direction is set by DNA charge, while separation distance is influenced by fragment length and the gel conditions. A ladder or control provides the reference for comparison; distance is a conditional size estimate, and band brightness is not itself a fragment-length measurement.
The method gives evidence from a band pattern, not an automatic biological conclusion. No voltage, run time or fixed band count is assumed here. Microarrays and bioinformatics are separate cards.
A microarray is a chip carrying many gene-specific probes fixed in a grid of spots. Complementary labelled nucleic acids hybridise to the probes, allowing many genes to be detected at the same time; the signal can indicate sequence presence or, when mRNA-derived material is compared, relative gene expression.
Sequence-presence reading — a coloured spot supports that a complementary sequence was detected.
Expression reading — stronger or weaker fluorescence is interpreted comparatively as more or less labelled cDNA from mRNA, provided samples were prepared and normalised comparably.
Controls and background — use matched controls and account for background signal before comparing spots; no probe number, intensity threshold or universal cut-off is assumed.
Microarrays are not a substitute for a full bioinformatics pipeline, and PCR and gel electrophoresis are separate cards. Spot intensity is a relative signal under the stated preparation and normalisation conditions, not an absolute expression value.
Biological databases store large, searchable collections of gene and genome nucleotide sequences, protein amino-acid sequences and protein structures. Computers can compare these records far faster and more consistently than manual analysis.
| Database information | Benefits |
|---|---|
| Gene and genome nucleotide sequences | locate genes, design primers, identify mutations or disease alleles, compare individuals/species and analyse large genomes |
| Protein amino-acid sequences | find conserved regions, compare related proteins and generate testable hypotheses about function or evolutionary relationships |
| Protein structures | relate three-dimensional shape to function, compare binding/active sites and guide further experiments or treatment research |
Central records let researchers worldwide search, align, process and share very large datasets, reuse reference sequences, update annotations and reproduce comparisons. This saves time, supports collaboration and allows new samples to be checked against known variants or structures.
A database result is evidence, not final proof. Its value depends on data quality, correct annotation and a suitable comparison; sequence similarity can suggest relatedness or function but still requires biological validation.
Genetically modified microbes or cultured cells can make human proteins in large, controlled batches. The purified recombinant protein replaces or supplements a protein whose absence or deficiency causes disease.
| Recombinant protein | Treatment role | Particular advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin | helps people with diabetes control blood glucose concentration | human sequence is less likely than animal insulin to cause an immune/allergic response and avoids animal-source objections |
| Factor VIII | restores part of the clotting pathway in haemophilia A | avoids dependence on donated blood and greatly reduces transfer of blood-borne pathogens |
| Adenosine deaminase (ADA) | supplies enzyme activity missing in some people with SCID, supporting lymphocyte/immune function | provides a defined human enzyme when the patient's own functional ADA is insufficient |
Shared advantages include a reliable large-scale supply, consistent composition, easier standardisation and purification, reduced dependence on animals or human donors, lower infection risk, and fewer religious or ethical objections to the source. Production can be adjusted to match demand.
Recombinant production reduces source-related problems but does not make treatment risk-free. Purity, correct folding, dose, route, immune reactions and manufacturing quality still require control; replacement protein may also need repeated administration.
Genetic screening tests people or populations for alleles associated with inherited disease. Its advantage is earlier, more specific information that can guide monitoring, treatment, counselling and reproductive decisions before symptoms or an affected birth.
| Example | What a positive result indicates | Advantages of knowing |
|---|---|---|
| BRCA1/BRCA2 variants | increased risk of breast and some other cancers, not certainty of cancer | more frequent surveillance, earlier detection/treatment, risk-reducing choices, testing of relatives and informed family planning |
| Huntington's disease allele | a predictive result for a usually late-onset dominant disorder | future care, work and financial planning; counselling; reproductive choices; a negative result may end uncertainty |
| Cystic fibrosis alleles | two disease alleles can support diagnosis; one allele identifies a carrier | carrier screening of couples, prenatal/newborn information, earlier treatment and respiratory/nutritional management, informed reproductive choices |
A targeted programme can be cost-effective when it screens for well-characterised variants common in the population. Earlier identification can reduce complications or mortality when surveillance or treatment is available, and results can inform biologically related family members.
Interpret the result according to the condition: BRCA variants alter risk, Huntington's testing is predictive, and cystic-fibrosis testing may show affected or carrier status. Screening accuracy and variant interpretation still require confirmation and genetic counselling.
Gene therapy treats a genetic disease by delivering a functional allele, or making a corrective DNA change, in the somatic cells where the missing protein is needed. Expression of the functional gene restores some of the lost cell function.
| Disease example | Target and route | Intended result |
|---|---|---|
| ADA-deficiency SCID | remove patient lymphocytes or blood-forming stem cells, introduce a functional ADA allele with a vector, then return modified cells | ADA is produced, toxic metabolites are reduced and immune-cell function improves; short-lived lymphocytes may require repeat treatment, while modified stem cells may last longer |
| Inherited eye disease such as LCA2 | inject a vector carrying a functional allele such as RPE65 into/near retinal target cells | retinal cells express the functional protein and may preserve or improve vision; the eye is small, accessible and relatively isolated from systemic immune responses |
Somatic gene therapy changes treated cells, not every cell and usually not the gametes, so the change is not inherited. Success depends on reaching enough suitable cells, expression lasting long enough, and avoiding immune reactions or harmful insertion/editing effects.
A social and ethical discussion asks who benefits, who bears risk, who decides and whether access is fair. Genetic screening produces information affecting individuals and relatives; gene therapy actively changes cells and may involve uncertain long-term effects.
| Consideration | Potential benefit | Concern or cost |
|---|---|---|
| Screening and timing | early diagnosis can allow monitoring or treatment before irreversible symptoms | false results or uncertain variants can cause unnecessary treatment, reassurance or anxiety |
| Consent and family | informed people can plan care and reproduction; relatives may also learn relevant risk | newborns or future children cannot fully consent; one person's result reveals information about relatives who may not want to know |
| Privacy and discrimination | shared records can coordinate care and research | insurers, employers or others could misuse genetic information if confidentiality is weak |
| Gene-therapy safety | one treatment may restore function or prevent severe disability | immune responses, harmful insertion/editing and unknown long-term effects may affect the patient |
| Cost and access | effective screening can target scarce treatment early | expensive programmes and therapies may widen inequality or divert resources from other care |
A defensible decision states the context and weighs evidence. For example, newborn screening is stronger when disease is serious, the test is accurate and early treatment changes the outcome; its case weakens if follow-up treatment is unavailable or unaffordable. Counselling, voluntary informed consent where possible, data protection and long-term monitoring reduce—but do not remove—the concerns.
Somatic therapy affects the treated person; germline changes could pass to future generations who cannot consent and therefore raise an additional ethical boundary. Do not present 'ethical' as one fixed answer: identify stakeholders, benefit, evidence, uncertainty and a reasoned conclusion.
Genetic engineering can help meet food demand by giving farmed animals or crops a defined trait that increases productivity, reduces losses or improves the quality of the food produced.
| Improvement route | Trait effect | Food-demand consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Faster or more efficient growth | more biomass or marketable product is produced in a given time | shorter production cycles or greater output |
| Resistance to pests, disease or competition | fewer animals/plants or less tissue are lost before harvest | a larger fraction of potential yield reaches consumers |
| Tolerance of a farm-management treatment | the crop survives while weeds or another limiting factor are controlled | reduced competition and higher crop yield |
| Improved product quality | nutritional content, composition, storage life or processing quality is improved | more useful or longer-lasting food from the harvest |
The causal chain must be explicit: engineered gene → expressed protein/trait → changed growth, survival or product quality → changed usable yield. Benefits are greatest when the trait addresses a real local limitation and is combined with appropriate husbandry, crop management and access to food distribution.
Genetic engineering is a method, not a guarantee of more or better food. Yield can still be limited by water, minerals, climate, disease, management, cost and access; resistance may evolve and ecological effects may reduce long-term benefit.
GM salmon, herbicide-resistant soybean and insect-resistant cotton increase productivity through different expressed traits: growth control, survival during weed control and protection from insect feeding.
| GMO | Engineered trait and mechanism | Productivity benefit | Management boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| GM salmon | growth-hormone expression is maintained for more of the year, so fish grow more rapidly | reach market size sooner, increasing production rate | prevent escape and assess welfare, competition and gene-flow risks |
| Herbicide-resistant soybean | crop survives application of the relevant herbicide while susceptible weeds die | less competition for light, water and mineral ions, so yield can rise and weed control may need less labour | repeated use selects resistant weeds; gene flow and herbicide use/residues require management |
| Insect-resistant cotton | a transferred bacterial gene produces a protein toxic to target insect larvae | less feeding damage, higher usable yield and potentially less insecticide spraying | target insects can evolve resistance; refuges/monitoring and non-target effects matter |
Do not swap the mechanisms. The soybean is resistant to a herbicide; it does not make the herbicide. The cotton plant produces an insecticidal protein against target pests. The salmon modification changes the timing/level of growth-related expression rather than protecting a crop from weeds or insects.
Each trait can improve productivity only under suitable production conditions. Faster growth, easier weed control or reduced insect loss must be weighed against resistance evolution, containment, ecological effects and management cost.
Ethical and social evaluation of a GMO must name the organism, engineered trait, farming context and affected groups. A benefit to food supply may coexist with ecological, health, ownership, welfare or consumer-choice concerns.
| Potential benefit | Linked concern or condition | Stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
| higher yield or less crop loss may increase supply and reduce food prices | benefit depends on climate, soil, management and fair distribution | farmers, consumers, governments |
| less insecticide spraying can reduce cost, worker exposure and environmental contamination | pests may evolve resistance and non-target species must be monitored | farm workers, neighbouring communities, ecosystems |
| herbicide-resistant crops simplify weed control and may reduce tillage | herbicide use/residues, resistant weeds and gene flow to non-GM crops can create costs | GM and non-GM farmers, consumers |
| rapid animal growth can increase production | containment, animal welfare and effects of escaped organisms require evidence | producers, consumers, animals, wild populations |
| patented seed can fund innovation and provide a useful trait | price, seed saving, dependency and unequal access can disadvantage some farmers | companies, farmers, regulators |
Food safety testing, environmental risk assessment, post-release monitoring, resistance management and clear labelling can reduce uncertainty and protect consumer choice. Cultural or religious values may still lead people to different decisions even when they accept the same biological evidence.
Do not argue that all GMOs are safe, unsafe, ethical or unethical. Reach a conditional judgement: state the specific benefit, identify who bears each risk or cost, judge the quality of evidence, and explain which regulation or management would change the balance.