CAIE IGCSE Economics 4.1. Government macroeconomic intervention Question Bank
Practise recognising government macroeconomic aims and explaining why aims such as low inflation and employment may conflict.
- Syllabus
- 2027–2029
- Course
- Economics 0455
Practise recognising government macroeconomic aims and explaining why aims such as low inflation and employment may conflict.
Read the source material carefully before answering Question 1.

Source material: The advantages of visiting, producing and living in Bermuda
Bermuda is a well-known holiday destination. It offers luxury holidays which are expensive.
Bermuda bans foreign fast-food outlets. It does have one foreign outlet selling fried chicken in the island's capital, Hamilton. This was opened before the ban was introduced in 1997. Some foreign multinational companies (MNCs), which produce other goods and services, operate in Bermuda. Bermuda is considered a tax haven. It does not have any corporation tax, but it does charge high import tariffs particularly on demerit goods which are harmful to health.
Bermuda has a higher literacy rate and a lower population growth rate than most other countries. Its GDP per head is high. Fig. 1.1 shows the relationship between GDP per head ($) and life expectancy (years) in selected countries in 2018.

Fig. 1.1 The relationship between GDP per head (\$) and life expectancy (years) in selected countries 2018
Bermuda also has a relatively larger tertiary sector than most other countries. Insurance and other financial services contributed 85% of its GDP in 2018. The Bermudian Monetary Authority (BMA) carries out most of the functions of a central bank. For example, it acts as banker to the government, holds the country's reserves of foreign currency and implements the government's monetary policy. The BMA has been relatively successful in keeping inflation low. However, government policy measures designed to reduce unemployment may affect the inflation rate. This is because policy measures can influence total demand, productivity and firms' costs of production.
Bermudian government policy may change, not only to cut unemployment, but also to reduce market failure. For example, higher indirect taxes on demerit goods may be used but it can be difficult to change people's spending patterns.
Discuss whether or not Bermudian government policy measures designed to reduce unemployment would increase the inflation rate.
Discuss whether or not Bermudian government policy measures designed to reduce unemployment would increase the inflation rate.
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why they might, which may include:
Expansionary fiscal and/or monetary policy measures (1) example of a measure (1) could increase total demand / increase spending (1) higher total demand could cause demand-pull inflation (1) if total (aggregate) demand exceeds total (aggregate) supply / there is limited or no spare capacity (1).
Shortage of unemployed workers / lower unemployment could push up wage rates / incomes (1) higher output could push up costs of raw materials (1) and cost of capital goods (1) higher costs of production (1) could cause cost-push inflation (1).
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why they might not, which may include:
Supply-side policy measures (1) could raise productivity (1) example of a measure (1) higher productivity could reduce costs of production (1) total supply could increase to match higher total demand / productive potential/capacity could increase (1) avoid / reduce cost-push inflation (1). Expectations of future inflation could be low (1) resulting in e.g. lower wage claims (1).
Unemployment rate is at 7% (1) not at full employment (1) unemployed workers may be willing to work at existing wage rates (1) there is some spare capacity (1).
Inflation rate is low (1) and so expectations of inflation may be low (1). Expansionary demand-side policy measures may just result in higher savings (1).
6
Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS ( 1 g, 1 h, 2 d, 3 d, 4 d and 5d)
Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded.
