13. Assessed scientific skills
- Syllabus
- 0620–2026–2027
- Section
- 13
- Level
- —

Start from the task, not from the amount of information available. Select only facts, values and relationships that can help answer the stated chemistry question, then organise them so the reasoning can be checked.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| locate | scan headings, labels, units, keys and named substances to find candidate evidence |
| select | keep information that bears on the exact command and reject distractors |
| organise | group related facts, put a process in order or align values in a table |
| present | use clear chemical names/symbols, headings, units and an answer form suited to the task |
For a question comparing two reaction rates, select the changing quantity, time values and controlled conditions; align corresponding values before comparing. A decorative detail that cannot affect rate is not evidence.
More copied information is not automatically a better answer. Omitting a unit, table heading, key condition or substance identity can make otherwise correct evidence ambiguous.
Translation changes the representation while preserving the substances, quantities, directions and relationships in the source.
| Source form | Translation check |
|---|---|
| verbal description | chemical symbols/formulae name the same substances and states |
| symbol or equation | words preserve reactants, products and proportions |
| data table | graph axes use the correct variables, scale and units; every plotted point matches a row |
| graph | numerical or verbal statement reports the correct coordinates, gradient direction or interval |
The equation 2H2+O2→2H2O translates to a 2:1:2 reacting ratio of particles or moles; it does not mean the masses are in that ratio.
A translation is not an interpretation. First preserve what the source explicitly shows; only then add a conclusion or explanation if the question asks for one.
Data manipulation is a traceable chain: align units, choose the relationship, substitute values with units, calculate without premature rounding and report a sensible precision.
| Check | Question to ask |
|---|---|
| identity | which quantity does each value represent? |
| units | must cm³ become dm³, minutes become seconds or percentages become fractions? |
| operation | does the required relationship call for a ratio, difference, mean, gradient or rearranged formula? |
| arithmetic | were brackets, powers and proportional factors applied to the correct values? |
| output | is the unit present and is the precision justified by the data? |
Estimate the order of magnitude before calculating and substitute the result back into the relationship afterwards. These two checks expose many misplaced decimal points and inverted ratios.
Do not round every intermediate step. Keep extra calculator digits during working and round only the final result unless the question specifies otherwise.
A pattern is a repeated or structured feature; a trend is the overall direction of change; a conclusion is a claim that answers the question using the evidence.
| Evidence feature | Defensible report |
|---|---|
| values mostly rise as the independent variable rises | state an increasing trend and name both variables |
| rate of change itself changes | describe the curve or compare gradients over stated intervals |
| one point departs from the rest | retain it and identify it as a possible anomaly |
| evidence answers the investigation question | form a bounded conclusion and cite the supporting values or trend |
Use comparative language tied to data: ‘as temperature increases from 20 °C to 40 °C, the measured rate increases’. Add ‘approximately’, ‘levels off’ or ‘except at…’ when the evidence requires it.
Do not explain why a trend occurs when the command is only ‘describe’. Do not claim causation from a pattern alone, and do not hide an anomalous value.
A reasoned explanation links an observed phenomenon or relationship to a relevant syllabus principle through an explicit causal chain.
| Part | Function |
|---|---|
| phenomenon | state exactly what changes or is observed |
| evidence | cite the relevant value, pattern, equation or comparison |
| chemistry principle | select the particle, bonding, energy, equilibrium, rate or other taught idea that applies |
| causal link | show how the principle produces the observation |
| boundary | qualify the claim if another variable, anomaly or limited range matters |
‘The reaction is faster at the higher concentration because there are more reacting particles per unit volume, so successful collisions occur more frequently’ links condition → particle model → rate.
Restating the observation is not an explanation. Every ‘because’ must introduce a mechanism or principle that actually accounts for the stated pattern.
A prediction extends an established relationship to a new case. State the relationship, check that the new case is comparable, then give the predicted outcome and any justified limit.
| Step | Prediction move |
|---|---|
| identify | find the relevant pattern, family behaviour or proportional relationship |
| match | check that the new substance or condition shares the feature controlling that relationship |
| extend | infer the expected product, direction or approximate value |
| qualify | distinguish interpolation from less-certain extrapolation and retain the evidence range |
If barium nitrate is stated to decompose in the same way as magnesium nitrate, transfer the given nitrate-decomposition pattern: predict nitrogen dioxide and oxygen as the gaseous products.
A prediction is not a guess based only on a familiar name. State the relationship that licenses the transfer, and do not invent a precise numerical value when the evidence supports only a direction or range.
An unfamiliar context changes the surface details, not the syllabus principles. Convert the prompt into known quantities, relationships and constraints before choosing a route.
| Stage | Action |
|---|---|
| decode | identify the command, target quantity or required qualitative claim |
| inventory | list given data, units, conditions and relevant chemistry principles |
| connect | draw a short chain from givens to target; split a multi-step problem into intermediate results |
| execute | show substitutions, equations, comparisons or deductions in a checkable order |
| verify | test units, magnitude, chemical feasibility and whether the final statement answers the command |
For a qualitative problem, eliminate claims that contradict the stated evidence, then connect the remaining evidence to a taught principle. For a quantitative problem, preserve units and proportional factors at every step.
Do not search for a memorised question with identical wording. Use only principles in the syllabus, and reject a numerical answer that is mathematically produced but chemically impossible or in the wrong unit.
Choose a technique or apparatus by the job it must do, the required measurement quality and the substances involved. Safety then follows from the specific hazard and exposure route, not from a generic precaution list.
| Need | Selection reason | Use or safety control |
|---|---|---|
| measure an accurate fixed liquid volume | volumetric pipette is designed to deliver one calibrated volume | use a pipette filler, never mouth pipette |
| deliver a variable liquid volume accurately | burette gives initial and final readings for volume delivered | clamp vertically; remove the filling funnel before readings |
| collect and measure a gas | gas syringe measures volume directly | make connections gas-tight before the reaction starts |
| heat a flammable mixture | avoid a naked Bunsen flame | use an appropriate non-flame heat source and keep ignition sources away |
| use a reactive or corrosive substance | minimise contact and splashing | wear eye protection and use the stated screen, distance or handling tool where justified |
Follow the method in order because timing, mixing, heating and collection steps can affect both safety and the validity of the result. Identify apparatus from its function and explain why it suits the task.
A precaution must reduce the stated risk: eye protection reduces injury from splashes but does not prevent gas escape or ignition. Do not claim that every hazard is removed by gloves alone.
A complete plan changes one independent variable, measures one dependent variable and controls other factors that could alter the result, while specifying a safe repeatable method and how the data will address the investigation aim.
| Planning decision | What to specify |
|---|---|
| question and prediction | expected relationship with a chemistry reason |
| independent variable | suitable number and range of values, including how each value is set |
| dependent variable | exactly what is measured, with apparatus and units |
| controlled variables | how each relevant factor is kept constant and why it could otherwise affect the result |
| method | quantities, apparatus, ordered steps, endpoint and repeat strategy |
| risk control | hazard, possible harm and a matching precaution |
| record and process | results-table headings, calculation or graph, and the comparison used for the conclusion |
To investigate how acid concentration affects reaction rate, vary concentration across a suitable range, measure gas volume against time, and keep temperature, acid volume, carbonate mass and carbonate particle size constant.
‘Keep everything the same’ is not a plan. Name the relevant control variables and say how they are controlled. A variable is not controlled merely because it is measured.
Record what is seen or measured at the time it occurs. Observations describe evidence; measurements pair a numerical reading with a unit; estimates report a justified approximate value.
| Evidence type | Strong record |
|---|---|
| qualitative observation | specific change such as ‘effervescence’, ‘solid disappears’ or ‘solution turns blue’ |
| analogue reading | read at the correct eye position and to the nearest half-scale division where required |
| digital reading | record all displayed digits with the unit |
| repeated measurements | keep every reading, including a possible anomaly, before calculating or selecting concordant results |
| results table | independent variable first; units in headings; consistent precision within each measured column |
Take enough measurements to reveal the relationship and repeat where appropriate. Constant mass is established by heating, cooling and weighing again until successive masses agree, not by assuming one heating was enough.
Do not change a reading to match the expected result and do not write an inference as an observation. ‘Hydrogen formed’ is an interpretation; ‘a gas was produced that gave a pop with a lighted splint’ records the evidence.
Interpretation turns processed observations or data into a conclusion; evaluation asks how strongly the data support it. Keep the observed pattern, the chemical explanation and the quality judgment distinct.
| Stage | Evidence move |
|---|---|
| process | calculate required quantities or prepare values for plotting without premature rounding |
| represent | use an appropriate graph and best-fit line when the variables are continuous |
| interpret | describe the pattern with variables and cite relevant values or observations |
| conclude | answer the investigation question and justify it from the evidence |
| evaluate | assess repeats, spread, resolution, range and anomalies; state how each limits confidence |
| use graph | interpolate within the measured range; treat extrapolation beyond it as less certain; determine requested gradient or intercept |
Concordant repeats are close enough to support a representative result under the stated criterion. If a result lies away from the pattern, keep it visible, repeat that condition if possible and exclude it from a mean only with a recorded reason.
A best-fit line need not pass through every point or the origin. An anomaly is not automatically a mistake, and a trend alone does not prove a proposed mechanism.
A useful evaluation links a concrete weakness to its likely effect on the result, then proposes a feasible change that reduces that effect while preserving the investigation's purpose.
| Limitation or error source | Likely effect | Targeted improvement |
|---|---|---|
| gas escapes before the bung is fitted | measured gas volume is too low | assemble and test a gas-tight system and start collection as reactants mix |
| heat transfers to the surroundings | measured temperature change is smaller in magnitude | use an insulated container with a lid |
| liquid level is read from above or below | parallax shifts the volume reading | read the scale at eye level at the correct meniscus |
| one reading is used | random variation cannot be judged | repeat, identify concordant values and calculate a representative result |
| independent-variable range is narrow | the pattern or turning point may be missed | use more suitably spaced values across a wider safe range |
| an uncontrolled factor changes | comparison is not fair | state how that factor will be held constant |
Write evaluation as cause and remedy: ‘Some gas escaped, so the measured volume was too low; make the apparatus gas-tight before mixing.’ This is testable and tied to the result.
Avoid vague labels such as ‘human error’, ‘use better equipment’ or ‘repeat for accuracy’. Name the source, its direction or consequence where known, and how the proposed change addresses it; repeats mainly improve reliability and reveal random variation.
Treat every chemistry calculation as one controlled chain: express the data in compatible forms and units, choose the relationship, rearrange if necessary, substitute, calculate, then round only the final answer.
| Requirement | Reliable move |
|---|---|
| fraction, decimal, percentage | convert to the form needed; percentage = fraction × 100% |
| ratio | divide all terms by the same factor; preserve the order of quantities |
| reciprocal | 1/x reverses a non-zero factor or expresses an inverse relationship |
| standard form | write a×10n with 1≤a<10 and integer n |
| equation | keep units consistent, substitute known values and use inverse operations to isolate the unknown |
| direct proportion | y=kx; doubling x doubles y |
| inverse proportion | y=k/x; doubling x halves y |
c=Vn,n=cV=0.250×0.0400=0.0100 mol
Keep extra calculator digits through intermediate steps. Report the final result with decimal places or significant figures appropriate to the given data and the measurement context.
Do not round each intermediate value or substitute quantities in inconsistent units. A numerically correct calculator display is not a complete result when a unit is required.
A unit must match the quantity and scale. Convert before substitution when an equation requires consistent units, and attach the unit to the final result.
| Quantity | Exact relationship | Smaller unit → larger unit |
|---|---|---|
| volume | 1000 cm3=1 dm3 | divide by 1000 |
| mass | 1000 mg=1 g; 1000 g=1 kg | divide by 1000 for each step |
| energy | 1000 J=1 kJ | divide by 1000 |
| pressure | 1000 Pa=1 kPa | divide by 1000 |
| Term | Meaning used in measurement |
|---|---|
| radius / diameter | centre-to-edge distance / full distance through the centre; diameter = 2 × radius |
| circumference | distance around a circle |
| square / rectangle | four-sided shapes used for area; a square has equal sides |
| diagonal | line joining opposite corners |
| angle / curve | amount of turn / a line whose direction changes |
40.0 cm3=0.0400 dm3; the conversion changes the numerical value but not the physical volume.
Cubic units are already volume units: the syllabus conversion is 1000 cm3=1 dm3, not a factor of 10 and not 106 for this pair.
Choose a representation that matches the variables, then read only what its scale and range support. A graph displays a relationship; a mean combines comparable repeated values.
| Task | Mathematical tool | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| show how one continuous variable changes with another | line graph or scatter graph with best-fit line/curve | direction, shape, intercept and values within the plotted range |
| compare separate categories | suitable chart | compare bar lengths or sector proportions using the labelled scale/key |
| estimate between measured points | interpolation | estimate within the evidence range |
| extend beyond measured points | extrapolation | prediction with greater uncertainty |
| rate of change on a straight line | gradient =Δy/Δx | include units from the two axes |
| starting value | intercept | value where the line crosses an axis |
| summarise repeats | mean =Σx/n | use only values selected by the stated repeat/anomaly rule |
Direct proportionality appears as a straight line through the origin: y=kx. A straight line with a non-zero intercept is linear but not directly proportional.
Interpolation and extrapolation are not equally secure. Do not claim direct proportion merely because the graph is straight, and do not average quantities that are not comparable repeats.
The recorded value must reflect what the instrument can resolve. Read an analogue scale to the nearest half of the smallest division where required and preserve appropriate precision in the table.
| Feature | Required convention |
|---|---|
| analogue reading | interpolate to the nearest half-smallest division where appropriate |
| measured value | decimal places and significant figures reflect the instrument's precision |
| calculated value | use the same number of significant figures as the least precise raw datum used in that calculation |
| table heading | quantity or symbol followed by solidus and unit, e.g. time / s |
| table body | numbers only; do not repeat units in each cell |
| repeated readings | record each reading before calculating or selecting a representative value |
| ratio | write in the order requested as x:y |
Values measured with the same instrument in one table column should normally show consistent decimal places, including trailing zeros that communicate the instrument's resolution.
Do not add unjustified digits to a coarse reading or remove meaningful trailing zeros. Significant figures describe precision; they do not make an inaccurate method accurate.
A graph must make the data relationship readable without distorting it: variables, units, scale, plotted points and the best-fit relationship all carry meaning.
| Step | Construction rule |
|---|---|
| axes | independent variable on x and dependent variable on y, unless instructed otherwise |
| labels | transfer quantity and unit from the table heading, e.g. time / s |
| scale | use sensible 1, 2 or 5-based intervals and more than half the grid in both directions |
| points | mark small crosses or encircled dots to half a smallest square |
| best fit | draw one thin, smooth line or curve with roughly even scatter on both sides; ignore a clearly anomalous point when fitting |
| readings | interpolate/extrapolate and read values or intercepts to half a smallest square |
| straight-line gradient | use Δy/Δx from a marked triangle whose hypotenuse spans at least half the best-fit line |
Gradient units are y-axis units divided by x-axis units. Use two points on the best-fit line or its large gradient triangle, not necessarily two experimental points.
Do not join plotted points dot-to-dot unless instructed. A best-fit line need not pass through the origin or every point, and an anomaly remains plotted even when ignored for the fit.
For Extended candidates, the gradient of a curve at one point is the gradient of the tangent there. The tangent is a straight line with the same local direction as the curve.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | locate the required point on the smooth curve |
| 2 | draw a straight tangent that touches the curve at that point and follows its local direction, with roughly balanced separation on either side |
| 3 | choose two well-separated points on the tangent, not on the curve |
| 4 | draw a large gradient triangle and read the coordinate differences from the axes |
| 5 | calculate Δy/Δx and attach y-unit per x-unit |
instantaneous gradient=x2−x1y2−y1
A steeper tangent has a larger gradient magnitude. A horizontal tangent has gradient zero; a downward tangent gives a negative gradient with the usual axis directions.
Do not calculate between two points on the curve: that gives an average gradient over an interval. The tangent must be drawn at the specified point before the triangle is chosen.