Award up to 2 marks for identification of relevant points. Award up to 2 marks for relevant development of points. Award up to 2 marks for justified decision as to whether being ethical will always lead to lower profit for a business.
Points might include:
- Limited/fewer sources of materials [k] leading to less output [an]
- Higher cost of materials [k] leading to higher variable costs/cost of goods [an] which lowers gross profit margin [an]
- Workers may have to be paid more/fair pay [k] increasing labour costs [an]
- May take time to source ethical supplies [k] which could delay production [an]
- Good image/reputation [k] so can charge high(er) prices/ lead to customer loyalty [an]
- High(er) demand / increase sales / enter new market / more customers [k] which could increase revenue [an]
- Help recruit/motivate/retain workers [k] leading to lower absenteeism/increased productivity [an]
- Investors more likely to invest [k]
- Can help create better supplier relations (by paying a fair price) [k]
- Less opposition from pressure groups [k]
This is a general question so there are no marks for application.
Increase cost can be awarded as [k] once where candidates do not refer to specific examples of costs.
Do not credit answers which relate to the costs of being unethical as this is NAQ.
Justification might include:
Being ethical could mean having to pay more to suppliers [k] increasing variable costs [an]. However, this could improve the business's reputation [k] allowing them to increase prices [an]. Being ethical will not always mean lower profit because a better reputation is likely to attract more customers [eval], and the extra revenue gained could cover the costs increasing profit overall [eval].