S2.2.1—Collecting data

Syllabus
First assessment 2025
Objective
S2.2.1
Level
HL

Record Experimental Data

Record what happened, not what was expected

Capture relevant qualitative observations alongside sufficient quantitative readings. Qualitative evidence may explain a change, threshold or anomaly; quantitative evidence establishes the size and spread of the relationship.

Record Include Why it matters
Raw data table Variable names, units, instrument resolution/uncertainty and unrounded readings Preserves the original evidence for later processing
Repeats Every reading, not only the mean Reveals spread and possible anomalies
Qualitative observation What was seen, heard or changed, linked to the relevant reading Provides context for interpreting the numbers
Collection issue What occurred, when, affected values and action taken Makes a repeat, correction or exclusion auditable

Address issues while preserving the evidence

If a sensor saturates, a timing event is missed or the setup changes, pause and check the method. Repeat the affected measurement under the stated conditions when possible, but keep the original entry identified rather than silently replacing or adjusting it.

Use consistent precision

Record to the precision supported by the instrument and keep units explicit. Enough data means sufficient range, spacing and repeats to reveal the relationship—not a large table of duplicated or invented values.

S2.2.1 Exam Analysis

Assessment in practice

1 marks
How it is assessed

Questions ask learners to plot a missing data point accurately.

Command terms

Draw

What earns marks

Place the point at the correct coordinates within the stated plotting tolerance and preserve the graph’s scale.

Watch for

Plotting the point in the wrong quadrant or ignoring the graph scale.

Retrieve Data Evaluation

Record before judging

Keep qualitative observations, labelled quantitative data, units and uncertainty visible.

Test the model

Use the graph shape, intercept, fit, error bars and repeats to decide whether a relationship is supported and whether errors are random or systematic.