IB ESS SL 3.3 Conservation and Regeneration Questions
Practise IB ESS SL 3.3 by evaluating population trends, protected-area design and species- or habitat-based conservation evidence.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS SL
- Level
- SL
Practise IB ESS SL 3.3 by evaluating population trends, protected-area design and species- or habitat-based conservation evidence.
Figure:Condor cape and Chumash traditional dance
Figure:Tourists watching condors on the Californian coast
Tejon Ranch is a 1000 km² home for California condors and an important biodiversity hotspot.
In 2008 the company agreed with environmental NGOs to preserve 90% of the property, including condor feeding grounds, while development could occur on the remaining 10%.
- Figure: Fact file on the California condor: California condors are scavengers and eat large amounts of carrion.
- They are among the world's rarest birds; 2012 counts estimated 405 total, including 226 wild and 179 captive.
- They are critically endangered and may travel up to 250 km in search of carrion.
- They mature and reproduce slowly, breeding at 6-8 years old and laying only one egg every two years.
- They are significant to many Californian Native American groups and traditional myths.
- Figure: Chumash cultural relationship with condors: Chumash people historically lived in central and southern coastal California; their descendants still live there.
- Old cave paintings show people wearing condor feathers for ceremonies and dances.
- Condors were once sacrificed during rituals; a legend says if the condor becomes extinct, so too will the Chumash.
Identify two arguments for the conservation of California condors.
intrinsic value of the species/biorights;
cultural value to Chumash and other Indians;
future generations should have the right to see them;
a lot of money has been put into saving them so far, shame to waste it;
role in ecosystem as clearing up carcasses;
economic argument to attract ecotourists;
one of the rarest species in the world, if we do not act now they will become extinct;
inspiring story - shows it can be done;
Table for roles in the conservation of California condors
Figure:Northwest Condor Watch Facebook page
Northwest Condor Watch is a communication space that links communities caring about returning condors to their northern home range.
Tejon Ranch is a 1000 km² home for California condors and an important biodiversity hotspot.
In 2008 the company agreed with environmental NGOs to preserve 90% of the property, including condor feeding grounds, while development could occur on the remaining 10%.
- Figure: Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act: the Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act made it illegal in 2008 to use lead bullets for hunting deer, bear and elk in designated California condor range.
- The act applies only in California; neighbouring states still allow lead bullets for game hunting.
- Organisations such as the National Rifle Association oppose the lead bullet ban.
- Figure: California condor captive breeding programme: removing eggs can make the mother lay another, increasing the total number of eggs, but some chicks then need hand rearing.
- Chicks are fed with condor-like glove puppets to prevent attachment to humans.
- Captive-bred condors have been trained to avoid power lines and people, reducing deaths due to power lines.
- The programme costs about US$5 million per year, roughly US$13,000 per bird.
- The aim is three populations: wild California, wild Arizona and captive, each with 150 birds and at least 15 breeding pairs.
With reference to the resource booklet, complete the table by identifying one way in which each of the following are playing a role in the conservation of California condors.
| Individuals or organizations | How they are playing a role in the conservation of Californian condors. |
|---|---|
| Individual citizens | paying for National conservation programmes through taxes/joining NGOs; |
| The Government of the state of California | passing legislation on lead bullets/enforcing conservation policy; |
| NGO | NGOs lobbying government/raising awareness/running ecotourism initiatives; |
Accept other reasonable responses.
Construction of a dead hedge
Figure 11(a): Conservation in Beijing
Beijing Zoo maintains an active breeding programme that recently produced over 1000 surviving offspring of nearly 100 species in one year, including critically endangered species and giant panda.
The Beijing Gardening and Greening Bureau plans to plant at least one dead hedge in each city park; dead hedges use pruning/forestry waste and provide habitat for small mammals and reptiles.
With reference to Figures 11(a) and 11(b), outline one advantage of Beijing Zoo's approach to conservation compared with that of Beijing Gardening and Greening Bureau.
a. zoo can provide specialised/safe conditions required for individual species;
b. it increases population of critically endangered species, which could be released into the wild/increasing genetic diversity / it produces populations for reintroduction of species / by breeding species prevents them from going extinct;
c. it raises awareness through education programmes;
d. it can gather revenue to fund conservation;
e. it supports (flagship) species that raise wider concern/support for conservation;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept only 'zoos prevent species from becoming extinct'.
Do not accept only 'helps to restore critically endangered species'.
With reference to Figures 11(a) and 11(b), outline one advantage of Beijing Gardening and Greening Bureau's approach to conservation compared with that of Beijing Zoo.
a. it supports/conserves whole ecosystems/food webs;
b. it keeps species in their natural environment / it creates habitat for wildlife;
c. it is very cheap / simple to establish/manage / makes effective use of green waste;
d. it is more ethically acceptable as it does not require keeping animals in captivity;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept 'does not require much space'.
Distinguish between the role of the jaguar as a keystone species and as a flagship species.
Keystone species: [1 max]
apex/top predator / integral to the food web/ecosystem;
Flagship species: [1 max]
popular/charismatic image / by protecting it, will help to protect the
ecosystems/habitat/other species / used to raise funds for conservation;
Do not accept descriptions of just predators eg 'controls population of primary consumers / eats organisms below it in the food web’.
Do not accept 'top of food chain / balances the food chain'.
Figure:The Barbilla Corridor within the larger international network connecting jaguar populations
Identify two difficulties associated with establishing and maintaining wildlife corridors such as those shown in Figure 6(d).
cost of acquiring/managing large areas;
the large areas covered by wildlife corridors can make it difficult to manage;
policing against poaching / greater vulnerability to poaching / corridors are narrow and more affected by edge effect / corridors may pass near or over roads resulting in some roadkill;
displacement of human settlement/industry / may create conflict with people's use of land eg for agriculture;
difficult to determine where to site wildlife corridors / land which is suitable must be available;
challenges of international collaboration;
spread of disease/invasive species from one region to another;
Figure:Condor cape and Chumash traditional dance
Figure:Tourists watching condors on the Californian coast
Tejon Ranch is a 1000 km² home for California condors and an important biodiversity hotspot.
In 2008 the company agreed with environmental NGOs to preserve 90% of the property, including condor feeding grounds, while development could occur on the remaining 10%.
- Figure: Fact file on the California condor: California condors are scavengers and eat large amounts of carrion.
- They are among the world's rarest birds; 2012 counts estimated 405 total, including 226 wild and 179 captive.
- They are critically endangered and may travel up to 250 km in search of carrion.
- They mature and reproduce slowly, breeding at 6-8 years old and laying only one egg every two years.
- They are significant to many Californian Native American groups and traditional myths.
- Figure: Chumash cultural relationship with condors: Chumash people historically lived in central and southern coastal California; their descendants still live there.
- Old cave paintings show people wearing condor feathers for ceremonies and dances.
- Condors were once sacrificed during rituals; a legend says if the condor becomes extinct, so too will the Chumash.
Identify two arguments for the conservation of California condors.
intrinsic value of the species/biorights;
cultural value to Chumash and other Indians;
future generations should have the right to see them;
a lot of money has been put into saving them so far, shame to waste it;
role in ecosystem as clearing up carcasses;
economic argument to attract ecotourists;
one of the rarest species in the world, if we do not act now they will become extinct;
inspiring story - shows it can be done;
Distinguish between the role of the jaguar as a keystone species and as a flagship species.
Keystone species: [1 max]
apex/top predator / integral to the food web/ecosystem;
Flagship species: [1 max]
popular/charismatic image / by protecting it, will help to protect the
ecosystems/habitat/other species / used to raise funds for conservation;
Do not accept descriptions of just predators eg 'controls population of primary consumers / eats organisms below it in the food web’.
Do not accept 'top of food chain / balances the food chain'.
Suggest two strategies that could be used to reduce the threat to coral reefs from tourism.
reduce/restrict tourist numbers/boat numbers / use daily quotas for visitor numbers;
ban littering/waste disposal in the threatened areas / develop recycling programs for plastic waste / fine tourists for littering;
ban individual collection of souvenirs/shells/corals/fish / ban and police trade in threatened species / enforce CITES regulations on protected coral species;
restrict boat speed to reduce damage to wildlife;
restrict areas (spatially/temporally) used for boating/by tourists (tourism zones);
ban diving/snorkelling without qualified guide who ensures appropriate behaviour that limits damage to the coral reef;
anchor boats in designated areas/area fitted with a mooring buoy / restrict number of boats allowed to anchor in designated areas;
develop non-intrusive interaction with marine life eg glass bottom of boat to view marine life / apply restrictions on following distances for whales/marine species;
conduct education awareness programmes/advertising to educate tourists on appropriate way to interact with wildlife/coral ecosystems;
build/invest in sewage treatment systems (to reduce BOD and suspended solids of effluent released into coastal environment);
Marking guidance:
Accept other reasonable responses.
Do not accept only "ban diving/snorkelling / use MPAs/LMMAS/no-take zones / legislation that prohibits any damage to coral reefs".
Figure:Protected corridor proposal to connect Mindo cloud forest with other Ecuadorian reserves
With reference to Figure 11, evaluate the potential effectiveness of the proposed southern corridor for wildlife conservation.
Strengths: [2 max]
a. Southern corridor will increase habitats/access to additional resources for local wildlife;
b. Corridor would allow gene mixing between different populations of wide-ranging animals thereby increasing genetic diversity of these populations / corridors help increase gene flow increasing genetic diversity;
c. Corridor allows for safe migration of species / corridor would allow migration of species threatened by climate change (avoiding possible extinctions);
d. Corridor may help to reduce human-animal conflicts;
e. The corridor may raise awareness in the local community/population and broaden/improve their involvement in conservation efforts;
Weaknesses: [2 max]
f. Corridor (shape) would have a high edge effect / corridor may increase risk to species traveling between reserve areas due to predators/poachers / the shape of the corridor may make it more difficult to manage/secure against poaching;
g. Corridor may increase spread of diseases/invasive species;
h. Southern corridor may force local people off their land and create friction/resentment towards conservation efforts;
Conclusion examples:
While there may be issues with edge effect and potential poaching along the corridor, overall the connection of the smaller reserve in Mindo Nambillo to the larger reserve will be effective due to increased habitat and genetic mixing.
While the corridor increases habitat and improves genetic mixing, the problems posed by local opposition due to land confiscations and the spread of invasive species and diseases outweighs the benefits, making the corridor ineffective for wildlife conservation.
Conclusion [1 max] needs to be balanced considering both sides of the argument for credit and makes a clear value judgement
Note to examiners: Conclusion is not mandatory, and 3 marks can be achieved through consideration of both strengths and weaknesses.
Do not accept only there is an increase in area.
Figure:Beaver-dam succession sequence — panel A
Figure: Beaver-dam succession sequence — panel B
Figure: Beaver-dam succession sequence — panel C
Figure: Beaver-dam succession sequence — panel D
Figure 7(a): Fact file on North American beavers
• One family per square km of river. Family groups have two adults and up to three young (kits) born each year between April and June.
• Mortality rates are high due to severe weather, lack of suitable habitats and predation.
• Population estimated at 250 million before fur trade hunting; about 9 million today.
• Feed on tree bark.
• Build lodges from wood and mud for eating, sleeping and raising young; remain in lodges during winter; protect their lodge from other beavers.
• Beavers are being reintroduced in Europe to help restore wetlands.
Figure 9(a): Dossier sobre la función de los castores en el ecosistema (role of beavers in the ecosystem)
• Beavers build dams from sticks, creating ponds and slowing river flow.
• Ponds are less suitable for river fish such as brook trout, but provide new habitats for aquatic plants, dragonfly larvae, bullfrogs and other fish.
• Flooding can kill riverside trees when roots are submerged, creating more bird nesting sites.
• Marshy areas may form at pond edges. Grasses and sedges colonize nutrient-rich pond silt to form beaver meadow.
• Beaver meadows have more light, higher soil moisture, more nitrogen and different vegetation from adjacent river-edge forest.
• Dams may collapse after heavy rain or spring thaw, or if the beaver maintaining the dam is taken by a predator.
Identify one benefit of the reintroduction of beavers in Europe.
beavers increase diversity of habitats with their dams which increases biodiversity;
opportunities for ecotourism as people can see the beavers;
beavers once lived in this area so this is ecosystem restoration;
additional food source for other species, eg wolves;
possible economic benefits if trapped for pelts;
increased genetic diversity of beaver population / can breed with other beavers and increase beaver population;
to restore wetland habitat;
Do not accept "beavers build dams that regulate water flow".
Identify one potential problem with the reintroduction of beavers in Europe.
increased damage to property (through gnawing wood);
flooding when beaver dams collapse / beaver dams can cause flooding;
increased conflicts between landowners and beavers;
upset/unbalance the food webs / outcompete other species / competition with other species;
impact on existing habitats / create short-term changes;
people are not used to them so will not know how to manage them;
poaching is a risk in a region with a high density of human population;
genetics of introduced population may be very different from that of original stock;
may not adapt well to new location and die;
may have no natural predator to limit population;
Do not accept "beavers are an invasive/alien species".
Figure:Drop in demand for shark fins in Hong Kong and mainland China
Figure 8(a): Conservation within the Coral Triangle
• The Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) is an agreement between all six nations in the area with the objectives of:
• ensuring food security and a sustainable livelihood of residents of the Coral Triangle
• protecting the unique ecosystem and marine species within the Coral Triangle.
• Conservation projects in the Coral Triangle involve collaboration between national governments, regional organisations, non-governmental organisations, private companies and local communities.
• Popular approaches to encourage sustainable use of the sea and its resources include creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and networks of Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs).
• MPAs are usually managed by national and local government whereas LMMAs are more likely to be managed by the local community.
• These designated areas are often classified according to their use or the restrictions placed on them, such as “no-take zones” where no fishing is allowed or “tourism zones” that can be used for recreation but where other activities such as fishing are banned.
• Some zones allow restricted activity, such as use by local fishermen using only traditional fishing methods or during certain times of the year.
• Research has shown that over time in a well-managed MPA there is an increase in fish size, fish numbers and overall biodiversity.
• There are currently over 1000 MPAs within the Coral Triangle.
• The Coral Triangle Initiative aims to designate 20 % of each of the main habitats within the Coral Triangle as MPAs by 2020.
Identify one way in which conservation efforts may have given rise to the decline in shark fin imports shown in Figure 8(d).
use of education/media/raising awareness to influence consumers' values/tastes (to reduce demand);
ban on trade in wildlife parts (increasing their protection/making them less available);
establishment of reserves where shark fishing is banned (increasing their protection/reducing their availability);
greater/more efficient policing of poaching in reserve areas;
growing demand in shark tourism means sharks are worth more alive to local communities;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept only "efforts to reduce trade in shark fins" without how this is being achieved (eg education/legislation/bans).
Do not accept "less sharks are captured" without explaining why (eg reserves that ban shark fishing).
Do not accept "tariffs on shark fin imports".
Do not accept only "fishing is limited/restricted / CTI-CFF agreement".
Justify the role of different environmental value systems (EVSs) in deciding between species based and habitat based conservation strategies.
Answers may demonstrate:
• understanding concepts & terminology of ex situ/in situ conservation; ecocentric/anthropocentric and technocentric value systems; biorights; intrinsic value; deep ecology; cornucopian values; stewardship; keystone species; flagship species; reserves; zoos; breeding/re-introduction programmes; gene banks; etc
• breadth in addressing and linking a range of in situ/ex situ conservation strategies with different value systems/perspectives on the nature of living things/species.
• examples of different value systems; different perspectives on living things and different in situ & ex situ conservation strategies.
• balanced analysis evaluating the relative merits and demerits of different value systems and their perspectives on in situ v ex situ conservation.
• a conclusion that is consistent with, and supported by analysis and examples given e.g. While ecocentrics are more likely to value the hands-off approach possible with in situ conservation there are certain cases where a natural habitat is so degraded the only way forward for conserving a given species is the more technocentric ex situ conservation.
The following guide for using the markbands suggests certain features that may be offered in responses. The five headings coincide with the criteria in each of the markbands (although ESS terminology has been conflated with "understanding concepts"). This guide simply provides some possible inclusions and should not be seen as requisite or comprehensive. It outlines the kind of elements to look for when deciding on the appropriate markband and the specific mark within that band.
Section B, part (c) markbands are shown below.
| Marks | Level descriptor |
|---|---|
| 0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below and is not relevant to the question. |
| 1–3 | The response contains: • minimal evidence of knowledge and understanding of ESS issues or concepts • fragmented knowledge statements poorly linked to the context of the question • some appropriate use of ESS terminology • no examples where required, or examples with insufficient explanation/relevance • superficial analysis that amounts to no more than a list of facts/ideas • judgments/conclusions that are vague or not supported by evidence/argument. |
| 4–6 | The response contains: • some evidence of sound knowledge and understanding of ESS issues and concepts • knowledge statements effectively linked to the context of the question • largely appropriate use of ESS terminology • some use of relevant examples where required, but with limited explanation • clear analysis that shows a degree of balance • some clear judgments/conclusions, supported by limited evidence/arguments. |
| 7–9 | The response contains: • substantial evidence of sound knowledge and understanding of ESS issues and concepts • a wide breadth of knowledge statements effectively linked with each other, and to the context of the question • consistently appropriate and precise use of ESS terminology • effective use of pertinent, well-explained examples, where required, showing some originality • thorough, well-balanced, insightful analysis • explicit judgments/conclusions that are well-supported by evidence/arguments and that include some critical reflection. |
Section B, part (c) markbands (official MS p18)