IB ESS SL 3.003.5 Habitat Conservation Strategies Question Bank
Evaluate protected areas, corridors and habitat restoration as conservation tools.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS SL
- Level
- SL
Evaluate protected areas, corridors and habitat restoration as conservation tools.
Plans are being discussed to restore a much larger area of the marshes by using a greater amount of water from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

Figure:2009 age/sex pyramid for Iraq

Figure:Irrigated, rainfed and total cultivated land in Iraq

Figure:Reduction in marsh area between 1973 and 2000

Figure:Species numbers in natural and re-flooded marshes
| Component | Natural marsh (Al-Hawizeh) | Re-flooded marsh (Al-Hammar) | Re-flooded marsh (Al-Sanaf) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salinity / ppt | 0.87 | 0.96 | 17.49 |
| pH | 7.64 | 7.95 | 9.40 |
| Total nitrogen / ug L^{-1} | 464 | 1652 | 2050 |
Table:Water quality of natural and re-flooded marshes

Figure:Valuing ecosystems and willingness to pay to restore marshes
The Iraq/Iran marshlands once covered about 15000 km^2.
The marshes receive only about 100 mm of rainfall each year while more than 2500 mm evaporates, leaving salty water.
Spring snowmelt formerly flowed down from Iran and Turkey, bringing sediment and washing away salty water.
The wetlands developed many endemic species and filtered pollutants; local food systems used fishing and water buffalo, and reeds were used for construction.
From the early 1950s, dams across the Euphrates and Tigris reduced water flow to the marshes.
After the 1991 Gulf War the marshes were drained by diverting water away, causing wetland desertification and displacement of indigenous people.
By 2002, marshlands had diminished to 760 km^2.
In 2003 floodgates were opened and embankments broken; partial re-flooding occurred but not to historic levels.
High salt concentrations have prevented ecosystem restoration in some areas.
With reference to all of the data in the resource booklet, evaluate the plan to re-flood the marshes completely.
arguments for complete re-flooding:
important habitat for certain threatened species / protect endangered/endemic species;
marshlands contribute to overall biodiversity/improve biodiversity;
marshlands provide important ecological services/resources;
important ethical/biorights/cultural rights arguments;
local communities show high willingness to pay;
could provide local people with employment/jobs/economic opportunities; flooding will remove salts/reduce salinization;
implications/limitations/issues:
increasing demand/competition for water resources in Iraq; people may have become accustomed to water that has been diverted; water may not be available due to dams/irrigation/HEP;
different groups have different willingness to pay/values; not all may agree equally with allocating more water to re-flooding; source of water is in the hands of other countries; re-flooding may not be successful (because of soil/water contamination);
may not have had enough time to evaluate success;
may need more active management, (e.g. habitat management and reintroduction of plant species);
may be very costly;
Marking guidance:
Accept other reasonable points, but only where they are of similar significance and validity to those exemplified above.
Award [4 max] for responses which examine only one side of the argument.
Note: do not credit responses that re-flooding has caused pollution/salinization.