IB ESS SL 1.2 Systems Questions
Practise IB ESS SL 1.2 by tracing inputs, outputs, transfers and transformations, then using feedback and resilience evidence to explain system behaviour.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS SL
- Level
- SL
Practise IB ESS SL 1.2 by tracing inputs, outputs, transfers and transformations, then using feedback and resilience evidence to explain system behaviour.
Outline how four different factors influence the resilience of an ecosystem.
Valid factors:
greater diversity of components/species increases resilience;
complexity of interactions/developed food webs increase resilience;
establishment of keystone species increases resilience;
larger storages/stores / more abundant/productive resources (nutrients, water, sunlight, reproductive rates, biomass etc) increase resilience (NB for credit, there must be indication of abundance in these resources, and if multiple examples are given like those in brackets, there is still only [1 max] allowed for this MP);
larger size of the system increases resilience;
strong negative feedback systems increase resilience;
strong positive feedback mechanisms may decrease resilience;
human impact degrading structure/diversity/abundance will decrease resilience;
a steady state equilibrium/balanced inputs and outputs (as in climax communities) increases resilience;
systems being close to a tipping point decrease resilience;
Accept converse statements.
Award [1] for each correct factor identified, up to [4 max].
If valid factors are identified, but their effect on resilience is not, award [1] for each TWO factors up to [2 max] (ie FOUR factors). Eg identifying TWO factors and their effect on resilience, along with TWO factors but no specified effect would score [2+1=3] total OR eg TWO factors and their effect, along with ONE with no effect would score [2+0=2] total OR eg FOUR factors with no effect ([1+1=2] total).
Explain how a community of trees in a woodland may be considered a system.
A community of trees in a woodland has the following features of a system: individuals/species of trees are the components of the system; these components are interrelated/interdependent/form an integrated whole; eg may regulate populations through competition / contribute to succession of community;
it has flows/transfers of matter/energy between components/storages; eg leaf fall may provide nutrients through decomposition to other trees / pollination/genes/food storage in seeds / glucose is transported from leaves around tree;
components carry out processes/transformations;
eg photosynthesis/respiration/growth;
it is an open system exchanging matter and energy with surroundings;
eg absorption of solar energy / provision of nutrients for non-tree species (NB mark for either example of matter or energy, not both);
it has feedback mechanisms to maintain equilibrium/balanced inputs and outputs; eg more seed production → more competition between seedlings → fewer viable offspring / death of trees → more light entering canopy → more tree growth;
Award [1] for each correct suggestion, up to [7 max].
Award [4 max] for identifying relevant generic features of system (given above) and [4 max] for examples of these within a tree community (beware of responses that are looking at entire woodland ecosystem as a system rather than the tree community alone). Credit alternative examples of equivalent validity/relevance and detail.
Disturbance of the composition and processes of the atmospheric system through human activity always disturbs the equilibria of marine systems.
Discuss the validity of this statement with reference to named examples.
• understanding concepts & terminology of greenhouse gases; global warming; thermal expansion; rising sea-level; melting ice caps; salinity; ocean acidification; ozone depletion; UV radiation; global productivity; tropospheric ozone; acid rain (worth noting here that acid rain is NOT a significant cause/contributor to ocean acidification); etc
• breadth in addressing and linking impacts on atmospheric systems (increased CO2; global warming; ozone depletion; tropospheric ozone; acid rain; etc) with disturbances in marine systems (rising sea level; ocean currents; fish migration; acidification; destruction of coral reefs; phytoplankton / marine food chains; etc)
• examples of relevant atmospheric pollutants/disturbances; ocean currents; coral communities; migratory fish; marine food chains; etc
• balanced analysis of the extent to which each atmospheric disturbance causes disturbance in marine systems whether significant, minimal or none at all, acknowledging relevant counter-arguments/alternative viewpoints;
• a conclusion that is consistent with, and supported by analysis and examples given e.g. generally, the statement is valid regarding large scale disturbances to the atmosphere such as global warming and ozone depletion but more localized disturbances like tropospheric ozone and acid rain have fairly minimal impact;
The following guide for using the markbands suggests certain features that may be offered in responses. The five headings coincide with the criteria given in each of the markbands (although "ESS terminology" has been conflated with "Understanding concepts"). This guide simply provides some possible inclusions and should not be seen as requisite or comprehensive. It outlines the kind of elements to look for when deciding on the appropriate markband and the specific mark within that band.
NB This is only an example of a possible conclusion. Candidates' conclusions do not have to agree.
Use the official Section B, part (c) markbands below.
| Marks | Level descriptor |
|---|---|
| 0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below and is not relevant to the question. |
| 1–3 | The response contains: • minimal evidence of knowledge and understanding of ESS issues or concepts • fragmented knowledge statements poorly linked to the context of the question • some appropriate use of ESS terminology • no examples where required, or examples with insufficient explanation/relevance • superficial analysis that amounts to no more than a list of facts/ideas • judgments/conclusions that are vague or not supported by evidence/argument. |
| 4–6 | The response contains: • some evidence of sound knowledge and understanding of ESS issues and concepts • knowledge statements effectively linked to the context of the question • largely appropriate use of ESS terminology • some use of relevant examples where required, but with limited explanation • clear analysis that shows a degree of balance • some clear judgments/conclusions, supported by limited evidence/arguments. |
| 7–9 | The response contains: • substantial evidence of sound knowledge and understanding of ESS issues and concepts • a wide breadth of knowledge statements effectively linked with each other, and to the context of the question • consistently appropriate and precise use of ESS terminology • effective use of pertinent, well-explained examples, where required, showing some originality • thorough, well-balanced, insightful analysis • explicit judgments/conclusions that are well-supported by evidence/arguments and that include some critical reflection. |
Section B, part (c) markbands (official markscheme p16)
The soil system includes storages of inorganic nutrients.
Identify two inputs to these storages.
Inputs:
Decomposition;
Infiltration of dissolved minerals / atmospheric deposition/precipitation;
Weathering of parent material / sedimentation from run-off / river flow;
Animal excretion;
Fertiliser use;
(Atmospheric/biological) nitrogen fixation;
Candidates may present their answers in the form of a diagram, but it is not necessary for full credit.
Award [1] for each correct input identified, up to [2 max].
Do not credit flows that are transfers or transformations within the soil eg ammonification / nitrification / capillary movement, etc.
Do not accept "pesticides" (these do not provide inorganic nutrients).
Identify two outputs from these storages.
Outputs:
Candidates may present their answers in the form of a diagram, but it is not necessary for full credit.
Award [1] for each correct output identified, up to [2 max].
Do not credit flows that are transfers or transformations within the soil eg ammonification / nitrification / capillary movement, etc.
Draw a system diagram to illustrate the impact of acid deposition on an ecosystem.
Credit may be given for flow diagrams that indicate cause and effect or conventional flows and storages.
Award [1 mark] for EACH correctly identified cause & effect link (arrow joining two boxes) [3 max]
Award [1 mark] for clarity/accuracy of diagram that includes impacts [1 max]
For terrestrial ecosystem eg:
For aquatic ecosystem eg: