7.1 Natural resources—uses and management

Natural resources are raw materials and energy sources used and consumed by society, including sunlight, air, water, land, rocks, ecosystems and living things.

Classify each by what society uses, whether it is a material stock or recurring energy flow, its regeneration rate and who can access it.

Sunlight is an incoming energy flow; fish are a biological stock whose harvest is renewable only when recruitment keeps pace.

Useful to society does not mean unlimited, freely accessible or sustainably used.

Resource does not mean unlimited or privately owned.

Natural capital is the stock of natural resources available on Earth that can support future goods and services.

A local inventory can distinguish living renewable capital such as woodland, recurring or replenishable capital such as a river or aquifer, and non-renewable geological capital such as rock or mineral deposits.

Removing mature forest faster than regrowth raises present timber income while shrinking the stock and its future service capacity.

Identify the stock, its location and renewal timescale before claiming that local natural capital is secure.

Natural capital is not the same as annual income.

Natural income is the flow of goods and services produced by natural capital without depleting the supporting stock.

A forest can yield timber and also regulate water and climate; harvesting that damages the stock can reduce both market goods and non-market services.

Measure the flow per unit time and verify that the natural-capital stock and process remain functional.

A large stock does not justify any extraction rate, and services are income even when they have no market price.

Calling nature 'natural capital', 'income' and 'services' is a model that foregrounds benefits and sustainable rates but frames nature in human-use terms.

The model can reveal stock depletion and make long-term resource limits visible. Its risk is an extreme anthropocentric reading in which nature appears valuable only for exploitation.

A forest described only as timber capital may hide intrinsic, cultural and spiritual value; adding those perspectives improves the decision without discarding stock–flow analysis.

Use the model for a defined sustainability question, then state which non-market relationships and values it leaves out.

A useful model is not a complete copy of the system.

An ecosystem service is a life-supporting benefit generated by ecological structure and process.

Damaging the habitat can weaken several services together because they share soil, vegetation, water and biological processes.

Trace ecosystem structure → process → service → beneficiary, then identify the pressure that could interrupt the chain.

Listing a benefit without its ecological mechanism cannot explain vulnerability or management.

Renewable means the resource replenishes at least as fast as the rate of use under stated conditions.

Compare extraction with recruitment, recharge or regrowth and include time scale and access.

A groundwater pump withdrawing 12 units while recharge is 8 creates a deficit despite rainfall.

When is a harvest renewable? when removal does not exceed recovery over the relevant period.

Renewable is conditional, not a permanent label.

Natural capital can hold several kinds of value at once, and different stakeholders may weight them differently.

A mangrove can be nursery habitat, storm protection, livelihood, cultural place and development land; a price captures only part of that value.

State value type, stakeholder, evidence and time horizon before comparing alternatives.

Different valuations do not imply that evidence is irrelevant; they show that several legitimate criteria may be in conflict.

Natural-capital value changes with scarcity, demand, technology, ethics, policy, knowledge and available substitutes.

A higher market value can coexist with greater environmental or social cost: lithium demand may rise while extraction adds water pressure and pollution risk.

Always state whose value changed, when, why and which alternative or new risk altered the comparison.

Changing price is only one signal; cultural, intrinsic, environmental and technological values can move differently.

Sustainable natural-capital use must satisfy two rate limits: extraction must not exceed regeneration, and waste release must not exceed environmental transformation or safe assimilation.

A fishery can remain within recruitment yet still be unsustainable if processing waste accumulates faster than the receiving water can transform it.

Measure both resource stock and waste sink; variability and delayed effects can make a safe-looking average misleading.

Keeping harvest below average regrowth does not excuse pollution or ecosystem damage elsewhere in the chain.

Resource security is long-term access to sufficient, affordable and usable resources—not merely their physical presence.

Compare availability, affordability, quality, rights, import dependence and resilience to shocks; neither community is fully self-sufficient.

A contrast must use the same resource and criteria while acknowledging environmental setting and external supply.

Local sustainability projects do not prove complete food or water security when critical supplies are imported.

A society's resource choice reflects economic, sociocultural, political, environmental, geographical, technological and historical factors, plus changing priorities such as net zero.

Named resource—lithium in Chile's Salar de Atacama: battery demand raises economic and strategic value, while desert water scarcity, extraction impacts, private-versus-national control, processing capacity and local politics shape the choice.

Net-zero agreements increase demand for electric transport and renewable-energy storage, shifting priority from coal toward lithium; this does not make lithium extraction impact-free.

Compare benefits, affected groups, geography, technology, governance and lifecycle damage before selecting extraction scale or ownership model.

A resource used in low-carbon technology is not automatically sustainable at the mine or community scale.

Choose a management lever that changes the diagnosed pressure on natural capital and can be implemented by the responsible actor.

Illegal overharvest may require enforcement and incentives; an information campaign alone does not remove the profit mechanism.

Diagnose pressure → choose actor and lever → predict behavior change → monitor resource and equity outcomes.

A popular policy is not automatically the relevant or sufficient lever.

The Sustainable Development Goals provide a shared global-partnership framework linking social, economic and environmental action on natural-resource use and management.

For example, SDG 6 can frame water access and ecosystem protection, while SDG 12 can frame efficient resource use, waste prevention and circular production; assess interactions with other goals rather than treating labels as proof.

A water project can improve access while increasing energy demand or displacing habitats, so indicators and trade-offs across goals must be monitored.

Use an SDG to coordinate actors, targets and indicators; verify actual resource outcomes and equity.

An SDG label is not an outcome measurement.

An environmental impact assessment is a sequence from baseline and alternatives to prediction, mitigation and monitoring.

The decision is stronger when impacts are compared with a no-project baseline and checked after approval.

A mine assessment predicts runoff, proposes treatment and monitors downstream turbidity.

Why is monitoring part of EIA? test predictions and trigger correction.

EIA is not a one-time permission form.

EIA law and guidance differ among countries and regions, but a defensible assessment starts with site-specific baseline conditions before predicting project change.

Select parameters relevant to the project—such as water quality and flow, biodiversity, soil, air, noise, livelihoods and cultural sites—then compare alternatives and propose mitigation to avoid or reduce harm.

If turbidity is already high before construction, later measurements require a different inference than a rise from a clean baseline; continued monitoring tests the prediction.

Guidance sets process and thresholds, while baseline evidence anchors attribution, mitigation and adaptive management at the site.

Guidance cannot replace site-specific baseline data.

Public participation improves decisions when affected people can access, understand and influence the evidence process.

Check reachability, representation and how input changes alternatives or safeguards.

A hearing held in a distant language-free venue may satisfy a form but exclude key residents.

What makes consultation substantive? accessible information and a visible response to input.

Attendance alone is not meaningful participation.

A renewable energy source can still have non-renewable impacts across its construction and supply chain.

Assess materials, land, maintenance, waste and decommissioning as well as operating emissions.

A wind farm has renewable wind input but needs mined metals, roads and blade disposal.

Which chain should be checked? life cycle from extraction to end-of-life.

Renewable input does not make every impact renewable.

Short-term profit can shift environmental costs into the future or onto other people.

Trace stock depletion, pollution and delayed repair to see who pays later.

Overpumping raises this season’s income but leaves a saline aquifer and higher future costs.

What is missing from the profit figure? external and delayed costs.

Profit is not the same as net social benefit.

Resource insecurity can constrain development, intensify environmental degradation and shift geopolitical power or conflict when supply and processing are concentrated.

A country may possess a mineral yet capture little value if processing and technology are controlled elsewhere; rapid extraction can also damage the ecosystems and communities needed for long-term development.

Trace location of stock → control of extraction and processing → dependence → socioeconomic, environmental and geopolitical consequence.

Resource abundance does not guarantee security, development or bargaining power.

Resource security can improve through three distinct levers: reduce demand, increase reliable supply or change technology to reduce dependence.

If water exists but pipes leak and low-income households cannot access it, reducing losses and repairing distribution may improve security before a new reservoir.

Diagnose quantity, access, reliability and import dependence, then choose the lever that addresses the actual failure.

Increasing supply alone can induce more demand or leave affordability and distribution unchanged.

Economic globalization can increase supply through trade and shared technology, while deeper interdependence can reduce national control and transmit distant shocks.

A port closure can raise food or energy prices inland even when local production continues; diversified sources and reserves can reduce but not remove exposure.

Map origin, route, processing, substitutes and concentration before deciding whether connectivity increases resilience or dependence.

More trade is neither automatically secure nor insecure; outcome depends on diversity, control, redundancy and equitable access.