Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.
Marks
Level descriptor
0
- The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data.
4-6
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
7-9
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
10-12
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
13-15
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Definitions may include:
Economic growth
Economic development
Interventionist supply-side policies
Economic models to support analysis may include:
- Lorenz diagram
- ADAS diagram
- Poverty cycle
- PPC
Possible barriers to economic growth and/or economic development in Tanzania may include a discussion on some of the following:
Increasing absolute poverty
- Absolute poverty means that people do not have access to basic needs, trapping them in the poverty cycle and limited possibilities for economic growth and development. (Text A, paragraph 1, table 2)
- But relative poverty has fallen possibly explained by the divide between urban and rural areas (Text A, paragraph 1, Table 2)
- Although HDI has improved, the HDI country ranking is lower, meaning that Tanzania's economic development has not improved as much compared to other countries (Table 2).
Rising inequality:
- Gini coefficient has increased from 2000-2018 (table 2), may lead to problems with social unrest (Text A, paragraph 4).
- Persistent inequality has not allowed for all people to benefit from the economic growth (Text A, paragraph 1)
- Rural - urban inequalities (Text A, paragraph 1, Table 2 data)
- growth has not reached rural areas due to the focus on manufacturing and service industries (Text A, paragraph 1)
- Most of the population is employed in agriculture (Text A, paragraph 2), limited opportunity for higher skilled jobs, which leads to higher incomes, better human capital, supporting further economic growth and development.
- Rural areas have less access to electricity (Table 2), less economic development, also may inhibit new businesses and investment needed in rural areas (Text A, paragraph 3 ).
- Urban middle class accessing more resources (Text A, paragraph 4), resources may not be used in areas of need hindering economic development and economic growth.
- Higher youth unemployment (Table 1), youth may be less skilled/experienced and therefore may find it more difficult to find jobs leading to lower growth and development.
Limited infrastructure:
- Insufficient infrastructure is significant as it supports the functioning of an economy and the ability for the population to conduct economic activity hindering economic growth. (Text B, paragraph 1).
- Inappropriate provision of infrastructure - urban rather than rural (Text A, paragraph 4), leading to less opportunities for economic growth and development.
- Farmers complaining that they cannot reach markets or suppliers due to lack of infrastructure (Text B, paragraph 1)
- Insufficient infrastructure may slow down potential land development, which is currently only using 30 % (Text A, paragraph 2) limiting economic growth and access to increased income opportunities in the rural areas.
Low levels of human capital:
- Rural sector only involved in unskilled work, so population not developing human capital (text A, paragraph 2), limiting opportunities for economic development.
- Economic growth focussed on capital intensive manufacturing/services (text A, paragraph 1), limiting opportunities for developing human capital and economic development.
- Education spending has decreased (Table 2).
- Numbers of students completing secondary school has fallen (Table 2).
- Currently not exploiting opportunities EAC may offer the low-income earners as human capital needs improving (text B, paragraph 4)
- Less significant over time if aid programmes are successful (Text B, paragraph 2).
Access to healthcare
- Improvements in healthcare struggle to keep up with population growth (Text B, paragraph 1).
- Government spending on healthcare has decreased (Table 2).
- Leads to poor human capital - traps people in the poverty cycle.
Rural sector barriers/Reliance on primary sector:
- Poor productivity in the rural sector (Text A, paragraph 3).
- Lack of investment (Text A, paragraph 3).
- Low YED (Text A, paragraph 2) leads to limited growth - economic growth needed for economic development.
- However, a new oil pipeline might bring in FDI, fund infrastructure and create new jobs. (Text C, paragraph 1)
- Aid and government programmes could encourage new business development (Text B, paragraph 2)
- Lack of tradable crops and land resources not fully utilised to fully capacity (Text A, paragraph 2).
Level of external and government (national) debt:
- Financing repayments could take funds away from development initiatives (Table 1, Text 1 paragraph 5)
- Significant at the moment with the depreciating currency (Text A, paragraph 5 ), but may be less of an issue if there is increased FDI (ECA and oil pipeline) inflows which may increase the demand of the currency and therefore the value. (Text B, paragraph 4, Text C, paragraph 1).
Informal Sector:
- Number of migrating youths are employed in the urban informal sector where working conditions are poor and unlikely to develop human capital (Text A paragraph 3).
Access to credit:
- Economists advised government to improve access to credit. If farmers cannot access credit, it is difficult for them to access capital needed to diversify. (Text B, paragraph 2).
Property rights:
- Lack of property rights has historically disincentivized farmers to invest in production, leading to low skills/productivity. Less significant now as the government has begun to introduce clear property rights. (Text B, paragraph 3).
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.
A maximum of [9] should be awarded if only economic growth or economic development is discussed.