Level
Marks
0
- The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data.
1-3
2
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
4-6
3
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
7-9
4
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
10-12
5
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
13-15
\footnotetext{
NB Answers that only deal with development or only deal with growth should be awarded a maximum of level 3.
}
Command term
"Evaluate" requires candidates to make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations. Opinions and conclusions should be presented clearly and supported with appropriate evidence and sound argument.
Answers may include:
- definition of development
- definition of growth.
Economic Models / theories may include
- an explanation of the links between growth and development
- an AD/AS diagram
- a poverty cycle diagram
- a diagram showing the effects of lowering tariffs
- PPC
- indicators of development.
Possible policy may include:
Strengths may include:
Limitations may include:
Improving human capital through more spending on education and health so that workers on farms can be more productive (Text D, paragraphs 1 and 2).
- also improves gender inequality index and health and education indicators (Table 4)
- may also reduce inequality between urban and rural areas and overall income inequality (Gini coefficient is very high) (Text D, paragraph 1 and Table 4)
- adds to productive capacity.
- needs funds but budget deficit already too large, with government debt and debt servicing costs rising steeply (Text D, paragraph 5 and Table 3).
Making it easier for farmers to get loans (microfinance) (Text D, paragraph 3).
- farmers can buy fertilizers or new types of seeds or invest in irrigation schemes leading to higher productivity.
- some farmers may acquire too many debts.
Improving soil quality by subsidizing fertilizers, irrigating more, investing more (Text D, paragraphs 1 and 2; Text E, Paragraph 3).
- increases productivity and therefore GDP (Table 3).
- may cause negative production externalities → unsustainable (Text E, Paragraph 3)
- needs funds but budget deficit plus costs of servicing the debt already large (Text D, paragraph 4).
Using aid from overseas to invest in infrastructure etc (Text D, paragraph 2 and Table 4).
- budget deficit will not be impacted as much (Text D, paragraph 5 and Table 3)
- can learn from overseas technologies (Text E, paragraph 1).
- loans will eventually need to be repaid, raising debtservicing costs (Table 3)
- overseas aid agencies may require more controls over the economy
- technology may be inappropriate
- infrastructure projects usually require more imports, which could worsen the deficit on the Balance of Trade (Text D, paragraph 5).
Using price controls to stabilize prices (Text E, paragraph 2).
- minimum prices can raise farmers' incomes and may use less child labour (Text F)
- maximum prices can safeguard the very poor.
- Inefficient allocation of resources and welfare losses → unsustainable.
Using export promotion strategies rather than import substitution (Text D, paragraph 5).
- potential gains from specialization according to comparative advantage
- will increase GDP and therefore incomes
- reduction of tariffs will result in cheaper imports (Text D, paragraph 5).
- focus on cash crops and crops for exports may lead to less help for small farms and more food insecurity (Text E, paragraph 1)
- supply shocks will occur due to droughts and cyclones (Text D, paragraph 4)
- reduction of tariffs will mean less government revenue and/or a rise in other taxes and will mean (short-run) losses for producers who compete with imports (Text D, paragraph 5).
Diversifying away from dependence on maize and on tobacco exports towards cotton, nuts, tea, and sugar (Text D, paragraph 5, Text F).
- growing rather than declining export revenues (Text F)
- more sustainable
- reducing risks of over-specialization (supply shocks/price volatility/falling demand for tobacco).
- diversifying into exports of other primary goods may also cause problems in the future due to low price and income elasticities of demand → volatile prices and lower earnings in the future (Text D, paragraph 5)
- should try to switch into higher value-added manufacturing and processing.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.