Question 1
Question (a)
Distinguish between perfect competition and monopolistic competition.
Answers may include:
- Terminology: monopolistic competition, perfect competition
- Explanation: that perfect competition is characterised by many firms, free entry and exit, homogeneous products and perfect knowledge, whereas monopolistic competition is characterised by many firms, free entry and exit and product differentiation;
and the impact of these features on the two markets with regard to pricing power, long-term economic profits and allocative efficiency
- Diagram: use of a perfect competition diagram and/or a monopolistic competition diagram.
NB A maximum of [6] should be awarded for responses that confuse monopoly with monopolistic competition.
Assessment Criteria
Marks ..... Level descriptor
0:
- The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-2:
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
3-4:
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
5-6:
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
7-8:
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used mostly appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
9-10:
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
Question (b)
Using real-world examples, discuss the impact of large firms having significant market power.
Answers may include:
- Terminology: market power
- Explanation: of the impact of significant market power in terms of the monopoly and oligopoly models
- Diagram: showing monopoly/collusive oligopoly (significant market power)
- Synthesis (discuss): the advantages and disadvantages of significant market power in terms of economies of scale, including natural monopolies, abnormal profits to finance investment in R&D and innovation;
the possible welfare loss, the risks in relation to price, output and consumer choice, the possibility that such firms may pursue goals other than profit maximization
- Examples: real-world examples of large firms that have significant market power.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.
N.B. It should be noted that definitions, theory and examples that have already been given in part (a), and then referred to in part (b), should be rewarded.
Assessment Criteria
Marks ..... Level descriptor
0:
- The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3:
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- A real-world example(s) is identified but it is irrelevant.
4-6:
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- A relevant real-world example(s) is identified.
7-9:
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- A relevant real-world example(s) is identified and partly developed in the context of the question.
10-12:
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used mostly appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- A relevant real-world example(s) is identified and developed in the context of the question.
13-15:
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- A relevant real-world example(s) is identified and fully developed to support the argument.