Q BankQuestion BankDocsDocuments

FP3.4 - Integration

Syllabus
2019
Topic
Level
A2

FP3.4.1 - Integration of hyperbolic functions

Integration of hyperbolic functions and expressions involving them.

Use fp3.4.1 - integration of hyperbolic functions to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.1 - integration of hyperbolic functions determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.1 - integration of hyperbolic functions to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: FP3.4.1 - Integration of hyperbolic functions is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

FP3.4.2 - Integration of inverse trigonometric

Integration of inverse trigonometric ∫ ∫ For example, arsinh x dx, arctan x dx. and hyperbolic functions.

Use fp3.4.2 - integration of inverse trigonometric to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.2 - integration of inverse trigonometric determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.2 - integration of inverse trigonometric to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: FP3.4.2 - Integration of inverse trigonometric is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

FP3.4.3 - Integration

Integration using hyperbolic and To include the integrals of trigonometric substitutions. 1 1 1 1,,, (a2 + x2) (a2 − x2) (a2 + x2) (x2 − a2).

Use fp3.4.3 - integration to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.3 - integration determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.3 - integration to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: FP3.4.3 - Integration is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

FP3.4.4 - Use of substitution for integrals

Use of substitution for integrals In more complicated cases, substitutions will be given. involving quadratic surds.

Use fp3.4.4 - use of substitution for integrals to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.4 - use of substitution for integrals determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.4 - use of substitution for integrals to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: FP3.4.4 - Use of substitution for integrals is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

FP3.4.5 - Reduction formulae

Derive and use simple reduction formulae for integrals, including powers of sine.

Use fp3.4.5 - reduction formulae to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.5 - reduction formulae determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.5 - reduction formulae to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: use the formula and units given in the question, show the substitution and interpret the result; the calculation alone is not the conclusion.

FP3.4.6 - The

The calculation of arc length and The equation of the curve may be given in cartesian or the area of a surface of revolution. parametric form.; Equations in polar form will not be set.

Use fp3.4.6 - the to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because fp3.4.6 - the determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply fp3.4.6 - the to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: FP3.4.6 - The is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

Objective notes

6 learning objectives
ConceptA-Level Edexcel Mathematics A2