Q BankQuestion BankDocsDocuments

3.3.5 - Assessing competitiveness

Syllabus
2017
Topic
3.3.5
Level
A2

a - Statement of comprehensive income

Interpret key information and stakeholder interest in statements of comprehensive income.

Use a - statement of comprehensive income to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because a - statement of comprehensive income determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply a - statement of comprehensive income to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: a - Statement of comprehensive income is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

b - Statement of financial position

Interpret key information and stakeholder interest in statements of financial position.

Use b - statement of financial position to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because b - statement of financial position determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply b - statement of financial position to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: b - Statement of financial position is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

a - Financial ratio calculation

Calculate and interpret gross profit margin, operating profit margin, profit-for-the-year margin, current ratio, acid-test ratio, gearing and return on capital employed using the prescribed financial statements and formulae.

Use a - financial ratio calculation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because a - financial ratio calculation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply a - financial ratio calculation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: a - Financial ratio calculation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

b - Ratio interpretation

Interpret ratios to make business decisions.

Use b - ratio interpretation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because b - ratio interpretation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply b - ratio interpretation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: b - Ratio interpretation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

c - Ratio limitations

Evaluate limitations of ratio analysis.

Use c - ratio limitations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because c - ratio limitations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply c - ratio limitations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: c - Ratio limitations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

a - HR calculations

Calculate and interpret labour productivity, labour turnover, retention and absenteeism.

Use a - hr calculations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because a - hr calculations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply a - hr calculations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: a - HR calculations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

b - HR calculation limitations

Evaluate limitations of human resource calculations.

Use b - hr calculation limitations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because b - hr calculation limitations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply b - hr calculation limitations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: b - HR calculation limitations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

c - HR strategies

Evaluate financial rewards, employee share ownership, consultation and empowerment as strategies to improve productivity and retention and reduce turnover and absenteeism.

Use c - hr strategies to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because c - hr strategies determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply c - hr strategies to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: c - HR strategies is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

Objective notes

8 learning objectives
ConceptA-Level Edexcel Business A2