3.3.5 - Assessing competitiveness
- Syllabus
- 2017
- Topic
- 3.3.5
- Level
- A2
Interpret key information and stakeholder interest in statements of comprehensive income.
Use a - statement of comprehensive income to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because a - statement of comprehensive income determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply a - statement of comprehensive income to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: a - Statement of comprehensive income is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Interpret key information and stakeholder interest in statements of financial position.
Use b - statement of financial position to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because b - statement of financial position determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply b - statement of financial position to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: b - Statement of financial position is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Calculate and interpret gross profit margin, operating profit margin, profit-for-the-year margin, current ratio, acid-test ratio, gearing and return on capital employed using the prescribed financial statements and formulae.
Use a - financial ratio calculation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because a - financial ratio calculation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply a - financial ratio calculation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: a - Financial ratio calculation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Interpret ratios to make business decisions.
Use b - ratio interpretation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because b - ratio interpretation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply b - ratio interpretation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: b - Ratio interpretation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Evaluate limitations of ratio analysis.
Use c - ratio limitations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because c - ratio limitations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply c - ratio limitations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: c - Ratio limitations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Calculate and interpret labour productivity, labour turnover, retention and absenteeism.
Use a - hr calculations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because a - hr calculations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply a - hr calculations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: a - HR calculations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Evaluate limitations of human resource calculations.
Use b - hr calculation limitations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because b - hr calculation limitations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply b - hr calculation limitations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: b - HR calculation limitations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Evaluate financial rewards, employee share ownership, consultation and empowerment as strategies to improve productivity and retention and reduce turnover and absenteeism.
Use c - hr strategies to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because c - hr strategies determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply c - hr strategies to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: c - HR strategies is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.