Award 2 marks for an explanation of one problem with
identifying system 1 / system 2 used by a customer.
Award 1 mark for a basic explanation of one problem with
Likely problems:
- Intuitive thinking/system 1 and 2 are cognitive processes so cannot be seen and have to be inferred.
- If the customer is observed to determine intuitive thinking, the behaviour of the customer may not match their type of thinking (e.g. they may be spending a long time looking at a product, but they are distracted and are thinking about something other than whether to buy the product).
- Customers can be asked in either an interview or questionnaire about their thinking about a product prior to purchase but this is subjective data and open to social desirability (might not want to admit system 1 thinking for an expensive product).
- If the responses are qualitative, it is open to bias/misunderstanding/difficulties with explaining
thoughts.
- All lower the validity of identifying the correct type.
2
7(b)
Example:
One problem with identifying whether the customer is using system 1 or 2 is that these thoughts are private and to access them inferences must be made from what the customer says and/or does. (1) Responses from customers as well as their behaviour can be misinterpreted, and the incorrect thinking style applied. (1) For example, a customer is seen to spend a long time looking at similar products before purchasing one but in fact they were distracted while browsing and just selected the first product that looked good to them. (1)
Other appropriate responses should also be credited.