ConceptConceptDocsDocuments

CAIE A-Level Economics 10.3 Policy Effectiveness Across Macroeconomic Objectives Question Bank

Practise comparing fiscal, monetary, supply-side, exchange-rate and trade policies across inflation, jobs, growth and external balance while evaluating conflicts and government…

Syllabus
2026–2028
Course
Economics 9708
Level
A2

Exam points

  • match each policy instrument to its transmission through AD, AS, exchange rates or trade
  • compare outcomes for inflation, unemployment, growth and current account rather than one aim
  • evaluate effectiveness through cause, timing, capacity, confidence, distribution and unintended effects

10.3 Effectiveness of policy options to meet all macroeconomic objectives question 1

[Maximum number: 12]

Increasing public sector debt is a good policy

Politicians do not usually think it a success to borrow a large amount of money but, in June 2020, when the economy was approaching a recession, the United Kingdom (UK) borrowed five times as much as it did in June 2019. This made the government debt only just a little less than the total size of the economy. The ratio of public sector debt to gross domestic product (GDP) was 99.6%. It was the highest figure for 60 years. Public sector net borrowing is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure for Question 10.3 Effectiveness of policy options to meet all macroeconomic objectives question 1 — CAIE A-Level Economics A2

Borrowing is what the government ought to be doing in a recession in order to finance the spending used to boost aggregate demand. The question in 2020 was how long could the borrowing of such large amounts continue? There can be problems with a large public sector debt. An expansion of government borrowing might increase interest rates if investors require more compensation because they think the risk of holding government bonds has increased. This interest rate rise would affect the rest of the economy.

There is also a theoretical objection that government borrowing could 'crowd out' the private sector, especially when the economy is close to its productive capacity and unemployment of resources is low. This would not happen when there are unemployed resources in a recession.

The UK Finance Minister suggested that a high ratio of public sector debt to GDP was justified; it is the stability of the ratio that is important. This reasoning can be justified. Reducing government spending in order to reduce borrowing would risk stopping any recovery and make the situation worse. Economic recovery is necessary to restore economic activity, which in turn will restore the government's finances.

However, economists cannot know with any precision what the limits of public sector borrowing should be. For many years, Japan has maintained a ratio of public sector debt to GDP of over 200% with no difficulty. But what is suitable for Japan may not be suitable in a different type of economy.

Question (a)

(a)

Consider what is meant by the phrase 'government borrowing could 'crowd out' the private sector.'

[ 6 ]

Question (b)

(b)

Assess whether the evidence in the article makes a conclusive case that the high level of government borrowing is an effective policy.

[ 6 ]

10.3 Effectiveness of policy options to meet all macroeconomic objectives question 2

[Maximum number: 1]

Increased borrowing by the government results in higher interest charges and this leads to less private investment expenditure.

Of what is this an example?

A

an automatic stabiliser

B

crowding out

C

the accelerator

D

the substitution effect

10.3 Effectiveness of policy options to meet all macroeconomic objectives question 3

[Maximum number: 1]

A government wishes to increase economic efficiency in the country. It raises the rate of income tax which leads to the emigration of high-earning skilled workers that the country needs.

How would this outcome be described?

government
failure

market failure

negative
externality

no

no

yes

no

yes

no

yes

yes

no

yes

no

no

All question bank results loaded