Practise IB Psychology HL 2.3.3 by analysing research methods and evaluating how evidence supports or limits conclusions about biological processes and behaviour.
Outline how one principle that defines the sociocultural level of analysis has been demonstrated in one example of research (theory or study).
Refer to the paper 1 section A markbands below when awarding marks.
The command term "outline" requires candidates to give a brief account of an appropriate principle and show how this principle is clearly demonstrated in a study or theory relevant to the sociocultural level of analysis.
Acceptable principles may include, but are not limited to:
- social and cultural factors influence individual behaviour (for example, social learning theory)
- we want connectedness with, and a sense of belonging to, others (for example, Asch)
- we construct our conceptions of the individual and social self (for example, social identity theory)
- people's views of the world are resistant to change (for example, Festinger et al.'s When Prophecy Fails study, 1956)
- our behaviour is influenced by others even when we believe we are acting independently (for example, Sherif's autokinetic effect).
Candidates are not required to give an in-depth account of the theory or study, but must focus on the link between the principle and the theory or study - for example, how Asch's conformity study demonstrates an individual's need to belong to a group.
If a candidate outlines more than one principle in relation to one or more theories or studies, credit should be given only to the first principle outlined in the first theory or study used.
If a candidate outlines a principle making no link to an example of research at the sociocultural level of analysis, up to a maximum of [4 marks] should be awarded.
Candidates should make a clear link between the principle and the research (theory or study) to gain marks in the top mark band. If the link is only implicit apply the mark bands up to a maximum of [6 marks]. If a candidate outlines a study but there is no relevant principle identified, up to a maximum of [3 marks] should be awarded.
Section A markbands
Marks Level descriptor 0 The answer does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 to 3 There is an attempt to answer the question, but knowledge and understanding is limited, often inaccurate, or of marginal relevance to the question. 4 to 6 The question is partially answered. Knowledge and understanding is accurate but limited. Either the command term is not effectively addressed or the response is not sufficiently explicit in answering the question. 7 to 8 The question is answered in a focused and effective manner and meets the demands of the command term. The response is supported by appropriate and accurate knowledge and understanding of research.