Scoring Notes:
- A response that only provides an interpretation of the given confidence interval is scored I.
- A response may satisfy the conclusion aspect of component 1 by using words such as "there is evidence to
support the alternative," "there is statistical evidence that Ha is true," "I am 97\% confident there is a
difference in means," or "because 2.9 is not included in our interval, it is not a plausible value for the
mean."
- If an explicit decision is stated and the conclusion is inconsistent with the decision, component 1 is not
satisfied. A response that incorrectly indicates that 2.9 is contained in the confidence interval and then
provides an otherwise correct conclusion based on 2.9 being contained in the interval satisfies component
1 but not component 2.
- A response that provides a conclusion that is consistent with an incorrect alternative hypothesis identified
in part B satisfies component 1.
- A definitive response that states that the average number of bedrooms is 3.10 (the value of the sample
mean or any other number) does not satisfy component 1, even if the response makes additional correct
statements about the alternative hypothesis.
- A response that draws a conclusion that is clearly about the sample mean (e.g., a statement about "average
number of bedrooms for newly built houses in the study") does not satisfy component 1.
- If the conclusion includes a definitive statement (e.g., "this proves that we have enough evidence that the
mean number of bedrooms in newly built homes in 2024 is 2.9" or "Rodney is correct;
the mean number
of bedrooms in newly built homes in 2004 is 2.9"), then component 1 is not satisfied.
- A response that reverse engineers the given confidence interval to obtain a standard error using a
reasonable critical value for a 97\% confidence interval and then uses the standard error to compute a
t-statistic and p-value to reach a correct conclusion satisfies component 1 but does not satisfy
component 2.