Scoring Notes:
- To satisfy the p-value comparison in component 1, the response can compare the value of the test statistic
to an appropriate critical value;
for example, |t|>1.985 if d f=97.489, or |t|>2.01 if d f=49.
- An explicit decision about the null hypothesis is not required to satisfy component 1.
- If an explicit decision is stated and the conclusion is inconsistent with the decision, component 1 is not
satisfied.
- The decision part of component 1 may be satisfied by implying the decision within the conclusion
statement (sufficient evidence for the alternative hypothesis).
- To satisfy component 2, the response must include reference to means, groups (e.g., 9 a.m. and 3 p.m.),
the sampling units (e.g., children), and the variable of interest (reading score).
- Examples of nondefinitive language in component 2 include "evidence to accept the alternative," "there is
evidence for the alternative," and "there is not sufficient evidence for the alternative."
- Examples of definitive language in component 2 include "accepts the null," "proves the null," "proves the
alternative," "accepts the alternative," "there is not evidence for the alternative," and "no evidence for the
alternative."
- If components 1 and/or 2 are satisfied and the response provides an incorrect interpretation of the p-value,
the score is lowered from E to P or P to I.
- The quality of communication for responses with score P should be considered if holistic scoring is
required.