Q BankQuestion BankDocsDocuments

Topic H: Clinical psychology

Syllabus
2026
Topic
Level
A2

- Definitions of abnormality

8.1.1 Definitions of abnormality:; the history of abnormality; statistical infrequency definition; failure to function adequately including Rosenhan and Seligman, 1989.

Use - definitions of abnormality to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - definitions of abnormality determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - definitions of abnormality to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Definitions of abnormality is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Classification systems

8.1.2 Classification systems:; ICD (ICD10 and ICD 11 when revised – 2017); DSM including DSM IVR and DSM V.

Use - classification systems to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - classification systems determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - classification systems to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Classification systems is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Debates in diagnosis

8.1.3 Debates in diagnosis:; cultural issues in diagnosis; reliability in diagnosis; validity in diagnosis.; Mental health disorders, symptoms, features, explanations.

Use - debates in diagnosis to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - debates in diagnosis determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - debates in diagnosis to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Debates in diagnosis is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Schizophrenia symptoms and explanations

8.1.4 Schizophrenia:; description of symptoms and features, including thought insertion, hallucinations, delusions, disordered thinking; the function of neurotransmitters as a theory/explanation; one other biological theory/explanation of schizophrenia.

Use - schizophrenia symptoms and explanations to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - schizophrenia symptoms and explanations determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - schizophrenia symptoms and explanations to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Schizophrenia symptoms and explanations is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Other mental health disorder

8.1.5 One other mental health disorder, symptoms, features, explanations selected from unipolar depression OR anorexia nervosa:; description of symptoms and features; two different explanations for the disorder (one biological, one non-biological). 40 Treatment and therapy.

Use - other mental health disorder to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - other mental health disorder determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - other mental health disorder to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Other mental health disorder is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Therapies for schizophrenia

8.1.6 Therapy for schizophrenia:; drug therapy; family therapy.

Use - therapies for schizophrenia to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - therapies for schizophrenia determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - therapies for schizophrenia to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Therapies for schizophrenia is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Therapies for depression or anorexia

8.1.7 Therapy for unipolar depression OR anorexia nervosa:; drug therapy; cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT).

Use - therapies for depression or anorexia to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - therapies for depression or anorexia determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - therapies for depression or anorexia to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Therapies for depression or anorexia is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Rosenhan (1973) sane in insane places

8.2.1 Rosenhan (1973) On being sane in insane places.; Contemporary study relating to schizophrenia.

Use - rosenhan (1973) sane in insane places to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - rosenhan (1973) sane in insane places determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - rosenhan (1973) sane in insane places to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Rosenhan (1973) sane in insane places is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Suzuki et al. (2014) schizophrenia and undernutrition

8.2.2 Suzuki et al. (2014) High prevalence of underweight and undernutrition in Japanese inpatients with schizophrenia.; One from a choice of two contemporary studies, choosing one that suits the chosen 'other' disorder: Unipolar depression.

Use - suzuki et al. (2014) schizophrenia and undernutrition to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - suzuki et al. (2014) schizophrenia and undernutrition determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - suzuki et al. (2014) schizophrenia and undernutrition to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Suzuki et al. (2014) schizophrenia and undernutrition is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Hans and Hiller (2013) CBT for unipolar depression

8.2.3 Hans and Hiller (2013) Effectiveness of and drop out from outpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult unipolar depression: A meta-analysis of nonrandomised effectiveness studies.

Use - hans and hiller (2013) cbt for unipolar depression to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - hans and hiller (2013) cbt for unipolar depression determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - hans and hiller (2013) cbt for unipolar depression to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Hans and Hiller (2013) CBT for unipolar depression is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Ma, Quan and Liu (2014) social support and depression

8.2.4 Ma, Quan and Liu (2014) Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between self-evaluation and depression.; Anorexia nervosa.

Use - ma, quan and liu (2014) social support and depression to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - ma, quan and liu (2014) social support and depression determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - ma, quan and liu (2014) social support and depression to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Ma, Quan and Liu (2014) social support and depression is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Becker et al. (2002) television and eating attitudes

8.2.5 Becker et al. (2002) Eating behaviours and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls.

Use - becker et al. (2002) television and eating attitudes to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - becker et al. (2002) television and eating attitudes determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - becker et al. (2002) television and eating attitudes to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Becker et al. (2002) television and eating attitudes is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Reichel et al. (2014) anorexia and body pictures

8.2.6 Reichel et al. (2014) 'Glass fairies' and 'bone children': Adolescents and young adults with anorexia nervosa show positive reactions towards extremely emaciated body pictures measured by the body startle reflex paradigm.

Use - reichel et al. (2014) anorexia and body pictures to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - reichel et al. (2014) anorexia and body pictures determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - reichel et al. (2014) anorexia and body pictures to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Reichel et al. (2014) anorexia and body pictures is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Research methods in clinical psychology

8.3.1 The use of research methods methods in psychology when carrying out research in clinical psychology:.; research methods from units 1 and 2 as appropriate.; randomised controlled trials (RCTs) related to clinical psychology.; neuroimaging, including structural and functional brain scanning related to clinical psychology.

Use - research methods in clinical psychology to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - research methods in clinical psychology determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - research methods in clinical psychology to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Research methods in clinical psychology is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Published research conventions

8.3.2 Conventions of published psychological research: abstract, introduction, aims and hypotheses, method, results, discussion; the process of peer review.

Use - published research conventions to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - published research conventions determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - published research conventions to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Published research conventions is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- HCPC guidelines

8.3.3 Awareness of Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) guidelines for clinical practitioners.

Use - hcpc guidelines to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - hcpc guidelines determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - hcpc guidelines to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - HCPC guidelines is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Decision making and data interpretation

8.3.4 Decision making and interpretation of data:; List A from Topic A as appropriate; List B from Topic B as appropriate.

Use - decision making and data interpretation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - decision making and data interpretation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - decision making and data interpretation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Decision making and data interpretation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Clinical research evaluation

8.3.5 Evaluation of research in clinical psychology:; issues of reliability, validity, generalisability, credibility, objectivity, subjectivity, ethics and practical application of findings as appropriate. 8.4 Practical Investigation.

Use - clinical research evaluation to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - clinical research evaluation determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - clinical research evaluation to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Clinical research evaluation is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

- Clinical psychology content analysis

8.4.1 One practical research exercise to gather data relevant to topics covered in clinical psychology - a content analysis that explores attitudes to mental health.; This practical research exercise must adhere to ethical principles in both content and intention.; In conducting the practical research exercise, learners must:; perform a content analysis; analyse at least two sources (such as radio interviews, newspapers, magazines) to compare attitudes towards mental health; make design decisions when planning and gathering sources for a content analysis, including credibility of secondary data, ethical considerations, controls and reliability; collect, present and comment on sources gathered; consider strengths and weaknesses of a content analysis and possible design improvements; complete the procedure, results and discussion section of a report.; ; Comparing how attitudes to mental health have changed over time.; ; How different sources report mental health. 42.

Use - clinical psychology content analysis to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.

This matters because - clinical psychology content analysis determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.

Example: apply - clinical psychology content analysis to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.

Boundary: - Clinical psychology content analysis is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.

Objective notes

19 learning objectives
ConceptA-Level Edexcel Psychology A2