6.5 - Analysis
- Syllabus
- 2021
- Topic
- 6.5
- Level
- A2
Perform calculations using the correct number of significant figures.
Use - calculations with significant figures to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - calculations with significant figures determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - calculations with significant figures to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Calculations with significant figures is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Plot results on a graph using an appropriate scale and units, including logarithmic graphs.
Use - graph plotting with scale and units to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - graph plotting with scale and units determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - graph plotting with scale and units to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Graph plotting with scale and units is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Use correct units throughout data analysis.
Use - correct units to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - correct units determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - correct units to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Correct units is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Interpret the trend or pattern obtained.
Use - trend or pattern to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - trend or pattern determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - trend or pattern to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Trend or pattern is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Determine a relationship between two variables or a constant from a graph, including finding a gradient with a large triangle.
Use - relationship or constant from a graph to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - relationship or constant from a graph determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - relationship or constant from a graph to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Relationship or constant from a graph is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Use the terms precision, accuracy and sensitivity appropriately.
Use - precision, accuracy and sensitivity to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - precision, accuracy and sensitivity determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - precision, accuracy and sensitivity to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Precision, accuracy and sensitivity is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Suggest realistic modifications to reduce errors.
Use - modifications to reduce errors to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - modifications to reduce errors determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - modifications to reduce errors to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Modifications to reduce errors is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Suggest realistic modifications to improve an experiment.
Use - modifications to improve experiments to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - modifications to improve experiments determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - modifications to improve experiments to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Modifications to improve experiments is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Evaluate uncertainties qualitatively and quantitatively.
Use - qualitative and quantitative uncertainties to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - qualitative and quantitative uncertainties determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - qualitative and quantitative uncertainties to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Qualitative and quantitative uncertainties is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Combine percentage uncertainties correctly.
Use - compound percentage uncertainties to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - compound percentage uncertainties determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - compound percentage uncertainties to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Compound percentage uncertainties is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.
Determine percentage uncertainty for a single reading using half the instrument resolution and for repeated readings using half the range.
Use - percentage uncertainty to connect the rule to the data and decision in the question.
This matters because - percentage uncertainty determines what can be inferred or chosen; begin with the stated conditions and keep the conclusion tied to the evidence.
Example: apply - percentage uncertainty to one small, clearly defined case, show the key step or comparison, and explain the result in words.
Boundary: - Percentage uncertainty is not a universal recommendation. Check the syllabus scope, assumptions, units and the limits of the evidence before generalising.