Level
Mark Descriptor
Level 0
Level 1
1-3
Level 2
4-6
Displays elements of knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to some elements of the question. Some evidence and contextual references are evident in the answer.
Chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident but they may not be developed fully or some stages are omitted.
Level 3
7-8
Demonstrates accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using relevant examples which are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question.
Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (6 marks) - indicative content
- Implementing supply-side policies has the effect of increasing government expenditure, which increases AD, leading to higher price level, reducing the impact of the increase in LRAS
- Opportunity costs- money spent on infrastructure would be better spent elsewhere or on a different supply side need
- Government may experience information failure and intervene in the wrong areas
- Magnitude- the impact will depend on the amount spent by the government on the interventionist policy
- Time lag- it will take time to build infrastructure/housing
- Time lag- investment in education will not have an immediate impact on productivity as it takes time for students to complete their education
- Need to ensure prestige products are not created
- Free market policies may be better to help make it easier to do business, for example, through deregulation of product and labour markets, reduction in taxation and cutting the costs of bureaucracy for firms
- Investment is already underway for rail routes, so will have impact without need for further government infrastructure investment
- Poor road conditions suggest significant investment is required
- More houses, roads, seaports, airports may cause more environmental damage
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
3-4
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches.
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
5-6
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence.
Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.
Question
Number
In 2019 the new President of the European Central Bank asked governments of eurozone countries to cut taxation and increase government expenditure to stimulate the rate of economic growth.
Evaluate fiscal policy instruments as a means of increasing the rate of economic growth.
Indicative content