Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance.
The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates
may make but this does not imply that any of these must be included.
Other relevant points must also be credited.
Quantitative Skill Assessed
QS2: Calculate, use and understand percentages, percentage changes and percentage point changes
QS9: Interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical, tabular and numerical forms
Knowledge, Application and Analysis ( 8 marks) - indicative content
Reference to Figure 2: In 2022 Ireland's rate of economic growth was
approximately 12.2% and approximately 2% for Germany and USA
Limitations include:
- Percentage changes are misleading without any reference to total GDP
- Differences in the composition of GDP: most of Ireland's GDP is made up of
investment by international companies, where their output produced can be
volatile - "Some of these companies are so large that the country's GDP
figures may be overstated"
- Fails to indicate whether the nation's rate of growth is sustainable or not -
"Apple Inc., the world's largest technology company, moved its European
base to Ireland in 2015"
- Differences in distribution of income as growth varies between countries -
"mislead analysis of matters related to income inequality"
- Quality of life issues, such as pollution from manufacturing: impact is hard
to measure - "mislead analysis of matters related to the environment"
- Methods of calculation and reliability of data may differ between countries -
"large fluctuations in Ireland's industrial production data. It rose or fell by
more than 10% from one month to the next"
- Currency values do not effectively calculate accurate purchasing power parity/exchange rates might not accurately reflect these differences in purchasing power of currencies
- Presence of an informal and unpaid economy will imply that some output is unrecorded as it is not bought or sold and there is no resulting income
- Does not consider differences in the size of population/population growth
- Subsistence, barter and the hidden economy will undervalue the real output and national income will not reflect true living standards between countries
- Differences in quality of housing/education/healthcare between countries
- The size of the public sector spending, especially in developed countries such as Ireland, which may or may not improve living standards
- Standard of living is subjective and therefore cannot be measured accurately
Level
Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Displays isolated, superficial or imprecise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Use of generic material or irrelevant information or inappropriate examples. Descriptive approach which has no chains of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Displays elements of knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to some elements of the question. Some evidence and contextual references are evident in the answer.
Chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident, but they may not be developed fully, or some stages are omitted.
Level 3
7-8
Demonstrates an accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using relevant examples which are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question.
Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (6 marks) - indicative content
- Benefits of using GDP for comparison - e.g., it is a standard measure used by all countries and is well understood by policymakers
- GDP is an accurate indicator of the size of an economy and the GDP growth rate is probably the best indicator of economic growth
- GDP is internationally recognised as it is the most reliable method of comparing living standards between countries
- Simpler to measure GDP than any other composite indicators
- Ease of using GDP data for comparison over time between countries
- Other measures may be better, e.g., GNI/GDP per capita gives an indication of average incomes, which is a key determinant of living standards
- GDP is dynamic and enables policymakers/central banks to determine whether their economy is contracting or expanding and promptly take necessary action to ensure living standards are maintained
- GDP allows policymakers, economists, and businesses to analyse the impact of changes in monetary and fiscal policy, economic shocks, etc.
- SR v LR considerations: The global health crisis of 2020 may have affected GDP of countries
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
3-4
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches.
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
5-6
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence. Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.