2.3.6 - Macroeconomic objectives and policies
- Syllabus
- 2018
- Topic
- 2.3.6
- Level
- AS
Governments seek sustained increases in real GDP and, especially, real GDP per capita. Actual growth raises current output; potential growth raises the economy's sustainable capacity.
Growth can raise employment, incomes, profits and the tax base, creating scope for higher material living standards and public services.
Growth is not the same as development or welfare. Its value depends on population growth, distribution, inflation and environmental sustainability.
Low and stable inflation means a small, predictable rise in the general price level. An inflation target states the rate the monetary authority aims to achieve using monetary policy.
| Stability supports | Reason |
|---|---|
| household and firm planning | future real costs and revenues are less uncertain |
| saving and investment | unexpected erosion or redistribution of purchasing power is reduced |
| competitiveness | domestic prices do not persistently outpace trading partners |
The objective is price stability, not necessarily a zero or falling price level. A lower positive inflation rate is disinflation, not deflation.
Low unemployment means that most people willing and able to work can find employment. It reduces lost output and skills, poverty, benefit spending and the social costs of joblessness.
The objective is not zero unemployment: frictional job search remains, and structural mismatch may persist even when aggregate demand is strong.
Distinguish unemployment from inactivity and the employment rate. A fall in unemployment may reflect more jobs, but it may also reflect people leaving the labour force.
Current-account equilibrium means avoiding a persistent, unsustainable deficit or surplus in trade in goods and services, primary income and secondary income.
A large persistent deficit may require continuing external finance and create debt or exchange-rate vulnerability; a large persistent surplus can indicate weak domestic demand and impose adjustment pressure on partners.
Equilibrium need not mean an exact zero balance every year. Judge sustainability, financing, composition and the economy's stage of development.
| Position | Relationship |
|---|---|
| balanced budget | government spending equals tax revenue: G=T |
| budget deficit | spending exceeds tax revenue |
| budget surplus | tax revenue exceeds spending |
Balance can limit debt accumulation and interest costs, but the appropriate balance depends on the economic cycle and the quality of spending.
A balanced budget is not the same as zero national debt. Forcing annual balance in recession can deepen the downturn and shrink tax receipts.
Greater income equality means narrowing excessive differences in disposable income, often through progressive taxes, transfers, public services and wider access to education and employment.
| Possible gain | Possible trade-off |
|---|---|
| less poverty and stronger social cohesion | poorly designed taxes or benefits may weaken work, saving or enterprise incentives |
| more equal opportunity and human capital | programmes have fiscal and administrative costs |
| consumption may rise when income shifts to high-MPC households | targeting errors can reduce effectiveness |
Equality is not identical incomes. Distinguish equality of outcome from equality of opportunity and examine both incentives and distribution.
The short-run Phillips curve shows a possible inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. Stronger AD can reduce cyclical unemployment but create demand-pull inflation and wage pressure.
| Policy pressure | Likely short-run movement |
|---|---|
| reflationary demand policy | lower unemployment, higher inflation |
| deflationary demand policy | lower inflation, higher unemployment |
The curve can shift after supply shocks or changed inflation expectations. Supply-side improvement can reduce inflation and unemployment together, so the trade-off is neither fixed nor guaranteed.
This is a short-run possible trade-off, not a permanent menu from which governments can select any combination.
Growth based on fossil energy, extraction and congested production can raise emissions, waste and resource depletion. Environmental rules or taxes may raise firms' short-run costs and slow measured output growth.
The objectives can align when clean innovation, renewable infrastructure, energy efficiency and pollution pricing shift production toward lower external cost. Better environmental quality can also protect health and productivity.
Evaluate the source of growth, time horizon, technology and policy design. A temporary investment cost may enable cleaner potential growth later.
Conflict is not inevitable, and GDP does not subtract all environmental damage. Compare social benefits and costs, not GDP alone.
If domestic inflation persistently exceeds that of trading partners, domestic exports become less price competitive and imports relatively attractive, tending to worsen the current account, ceteris paribus.
Deflationary policy may lower inflation and imports, improving the current account, but can reduce growth and employment. Exchange-rate appreciation may lower imported inflation yet worsen net exports.
Effects depend on exchange rates, elasticities, non-price competitiveness, imported input costs and supply capacity.
Low inflation does not guarantee current-account equilibrium; weak quality, global demand or a strong currency may dominate.
Growth can widen inequality when gains accrue mainly to asset owners, high-skilled workers, profitable regions or capital-intensive firms.
Growth can narrow inequality when it creates broad employment, raises low wages, finances public services and is paired with progressive taxes, transfers and access to skills.
Compare real disposable incomes across the distribution, not just average GDP per capita. The source, ownership and policy treatment of growth determine the outcome.
Growth and equality are not automatically substitutes or complements; trace who receives factor income and who bears taxes and costs.
Supply-side policies aim to increase productivity, competition and incentives, raising sustainable productive capacity and shifting LRAS right.
| Channel | Intended result |
|---|---|
| productivity | more output per input and lower unit costs |
| competition | stronger efficiency, innovation and consumer choice |
| incentives | greater work, saving, investment and enterprise |
Successful policy can raise potential growth and employment while easing inflation pressure. Some measures also raise AD in the short run.
A policy labelled supply-side must change capacity or productive behaviour; government spending that only raises current demand is not enough.
| Policy | Intended mechanism |
|---|---|
| product/labour deregulation | lower entry or adjustment costs and increase flexibility |
| privatisation | expose state activity to ownership incentives and competition |
| lower income/profit taxes | increase rewards to work, enterprise and investment |
| changed welfare payments | strengthen incentives to enter employment |
| lower bureaucracy costs | release firm time and resources for production |
Results require genuine competition and capable regulation. Deregulation can weaken worker, consumer or environmental protection; lower tax or benefits can worsen inequality and public finances.
Privatisation alone does not create competition, and weaker welfare does not create vacancies or skills.
| Policy | Capacity channel |
|---|---|
| education, training and skills | raise human capital and labour mobility |
| investment tax incentives or subsidies | lower the private cost of capital investment |
| transport, energy and digital infrastructure | reduce costs, delays and market isolation |
| start-up finance | address finance gaps and support entry/innovation |
| regional policy | improve infrastructure, skills and investment in lagging areas |
Infrastructure and training spending can raise AD now and LRAS later. Separate the multiplier effect from the eventual productivity effect.
Public spending is not automatically productive: targeting, additionality, project quality and time lags determine whether capacity rises.
| Test | Question |
|---|---|
| diagnosis | Is the problem skills, incentives, infrastructure, competition or weak AD? |
| magnitude and lag | Is the policy large enough, and when will effects arrive? |
| fiscal/opportunity cost | What spending or tax revenue is displaced? |
| distribution/externalities | Who gains, who loses, and what wider costs arise? |
| implementation | Can institutions target, enforce and review it? |
Market policies may be quicker and cheaper but can create market failure; intervention can correct coordination and finance gaps but risks government failure.
Do not claim every supply-side policy cures cyclical unemployment. When deficient AD is the cause, capacity reform alone may leave resources unused.
| Policy | Decision-maker/instruments | Reflationary direction | Deflationary direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| fiscal | government: spending and taxation | higher G and/or lower tax | lower G and/or higher tax |
| monetary | central bank: rates, QE, lending/liquidity rules | easier credit/more liquidity | tighter credit/less liquidity |
Reflationary policy raises AD to support output and employment; deflationary policy lowers AD to reduce demand-pull inflation or external/budget imbalance.
Fiscal describes government budget instruments; monetary describes money and credit instruments. The policy name and its direction are separate classifications.
Higher government purchases directly raise G in AD; cuts reduce it. Infrastructure may additionally raise LRAS if it improves productivity.
Lower income tax can raise disposable income and consumption; lower profit tax can raise retained profit and investment; indirect-tax changes can affect both prices/costs and demand.
Changes in spending or tax begin multiplier rounds, but saving, tax and imports leak income. Tax changes depend on households' and firms' responses.
Transfers do not enter G directly; their demand effect occurs when recipients spend. Always distinguish the short-run AD channel from a possible long-run LRAS channel.
| Instrument eased | Transmission toward higher AD |
|---|---|
| lower base interest rate | cheaper borrowing, less reward to save, possible currency depreciation |
| quantitative easing | central bank asset purchases add liquidity, lower yields and support credit/asset prices |
| looser lending criteria | more households and firms qualify for credit |
| lower reserve/liquidity requirement | banks can lend a larger share of deposits |
Tightening reverses these directions: borrowing and spending fall, saving is encouraged, credit creation slows and inflation pressure may ease.
The reserve requirement is the share of deposits banks must hold rather than lend. QE is asset purchase with newly created central-bank money, not ordinary government spending.
Transmission is not mechanical: confidence, bank balance sheets, fixed-rate debt, exchange rates, spare capacity and supply shocks affect the result.
| Role | What it involves |
|---|---|
| implement monetary policy | set/use rates, asset purchases, lending criteria and liquidity rules |
| pursue inflation target | forecast inflation and adjust policy toward price stability |
| banker to government | hold accounts, make payments and support debt operations |
| banker to banks/lender of last resort | supply emergency liquidity to solvent institutions facing funding stress |
Lender-of-last-resort support can prevent a liquidity crisis spreading, but conditions and supervision are needed to limit moral hazard.
A central bank does not set fiscal taxes or spending. Emergency bank liquidity is not the same as permanently financing insolvent institutions.
| Test | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| size of output gap/AS elasticity | determines output versus price response |
| multiplier and interest sensitivity | determine strength of fiscal and monetary transmission |
| time lags | recognition, decision and implementation delay impact |
| confidence and credit conditions | weak responses can blunt rate, tax or spending changes |
| fiscal debt and distribution | policy can shift future burdens and unequal effects |
| exchange rate/current account | monetary changes spill into trade and imported inflation |
Fiscal policy can target groups, regions and infrastructure but faces political/implementation lags and debt cost. Monetary policy can change quickly and independently but is broad, uncertain and weak near very low rates or during credit stress.
A policy mix can combine demand stabilisation with supply-side measures, but conflicting settings can offset each other.
Judge a policy against the diagnosed shock and objectives; no demand-side instrument is always strongest or costless.