Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make, but this does not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
QS9: Interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical, tabular and numerical forms.
Knowledge, Application and Analysis ( 8 marks) - indicative content
- Definition/understanding of economic growth rate
- Understanding of market-orientated strategies
- Removal of government subsidies - forcing firms to focus on being more competitive rather than relying on subsidies, e.g. by increasing productivity: "removal of government subsidies on oil and fuel"
- Floating exchange rate systems - might make exports more internationally competitive, increasing export-led growth
- Privatisation - increases efficiency in markets due to greater competition; attracts more investment, therefore greater injections into the circular flow of income: "To take advantage of the rising global demand for electric vehicles, the Government announced plans to increase privatisation"
- Deregulation - it reduces the costs for businesses to comply and implement regulation, quicker to employ and lay off workers as required: "Government relaxed its previously strict employment regulations to create more jobs, fill vacancies and promote innovation. This encouraged more FDI"
- Promotion of FDI - e.g. tax breaks could help technology transfer and help with training of the workforce; leads to increased productivity and economic growth: "To take advantage of the rising global demand for electric vehicles, the Government announced plans to ... promote foreign direct investment"
- Trade liberalisation/removal of trade barriers
Level
Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Level 2
4-6
reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident but they
may not be developed fully or some stages are omitted.
Level 3
7-8
Demonstrates accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using relevant examples that are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question. Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (6 marks) - indicative content
- Problems of each of the strategy discussed:
- removal of government subsidies - on e.g. essential goods such as oil, may lead to an increase in absolute poverty
- floating exchange rate systems - the depreciation is likely to make Indonesia's imports relatively more expensive, leading to cost-push inflation and hence poverty
- deregulation- could result in exploitation of labour
- privatisation - could result in monopolies that may exploit their market power and charge higher prices/reduce quality
- promotion of FDI - could lead to TNCs exploiting the environment and labour; engage in tax evasion/avoidance or transfer pricing
- Assessment of the significance of the strategies considered in analysis
- Policy may be less effective as an increase in inflation might reduce economic growth because it could lead to greater uncertainty/lower international competitiveness of firms - "In 2023 it was forecast that Indonesia's rate of inflation would increase to 5.5\%"
- Policy may be less effective if the central bank raises the base interest rate to tackle inflation as this might restrict economic growth in the long-run
- Corruption might limit future economic growth as any Government revenue may be diverted into the wrong channels: "Indonesia scored 38 out of 100 on the corruption index"
- Interventionist strategies could be more successful in increasing economic growth: "the Government must aim to develop the country's human capital and infrastructure"
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
3-4
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
5-6
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence. Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.