Practise public spending, taxation, deficits, debt and macro policy through data, diagrams and country evaluation, including TNC controls and policy limits.
From 2017 to 2021 public expenditure as a proportion of GDP rose from 25.1\% to 29.5\% in Azerbaijan and from 12.5\% to 15.9\% in India. Evaluate possible causes of an increase in public expenditure as a proportion of GDP in a developing economy of your choice.
Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
QS9: Interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical, tabular and numerical forms.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis (12 marks) - indicative content
- Understanding of public expenditure
Possible causes could include:
- Changes in level of GDP: during periods of economic downturn, public expenditure as a proportion of GDP would increase, even if it stayed the same or declined at a slower rate than GDP
- Automatic stabilisers: when GDP falls, public expenditure is likely to rise;
people become eligible for means-tested/unemployment benefits
- External shocks: e.g. global health crisis;
natural disasters e.g. earthquakes, floods;
subsidies to households and firms resulting from rise in energy prices
- Increased expectations: people may expect higher standards of education or health - these public services may be normal or luxury goods (income elastic)
- Ageing population: it may require greater government spending, e.g. on state pensions, social care etc
- Increase in the size of the population: puts greater pressure on public goods and services e.g. healthcare, education etc
- Discretionary fiscal policy: government may decide to spend more on a specific area, e.g. housing, infrastructure etc
- Increased interest payments: as the national debt increases / interest rates increase, governments have to make higher interest payments on their debt
- Rise in the tax base: reducing tax evasion and avoidance, allowing greater spending as a proportion of GDP
- Political priorities: based on the value judgements of government
N.B. Award maximum of Level 3 ( 9 marks) if a candidate does not refer to a developing country in their answer
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Displays isolated, superficial or imprecise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models. Use of generic material or irrelevant information or inappropriate examples.
Descriptive approach which has no chains of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Displays elements of knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Limited application of knowledge and understanding to economic problems in context.
A narrow response or superficial, only two-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Level 3
7-9
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to some elements of the question. Some evidence and contextual references are evident in the answer.
Analysis is clear and coherent. Chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident but they may not be developed fully or some stages are omitted.
Level 4
10-12
Demonstrates accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models. Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using appropriate examples which are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question.
Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (8 marks) - indicative content
- Prioritisation of causes analysed - discussion of the most important cause
- Discussion of the magnitude of the increase in public expenditure e.g. 4.4pp for Azerbaijan and 3.4pp for India: relatively small increase
- Significance of the causes vary over time and between countries
- Likely to be a combination of causes that has contributed to the increase
- Changes in the level of GDP would explain short-run changes only - when the economic cycle changes country could face the reverse effect
- Ageing populations may imply that less spending is required for education and healthcare
- Interest payments depend on the interest rate as well as the amount owing
- The level of public expenditure may not be rising if GDP is falling
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches.
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
7-8
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence, leading to an informed judgement.
Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.
Between 2014 and 2019 France's public expenditure as a proportion of GDP fell from 57.2% to 55.6\%.
Which one of the following is the likely impact of a decrease in public expenditure?
A decrease in unemployment
A decrease in crowding out
An increase in injections
An increase in inflationary pressures
B
The Government of Hungary operates an income tax system in which the proportion of income paid in tax by individuals remains constant as incomes increase.
Which one of the following can be deduced from this information?
Hungary has a progressive tax system
Hungary has a regressive tax system
Hungary has a proportional tax system
Hungary has a specific tax system
C