Practise analysing currency-market intervention, from buying or selling currencies to interest-rate policy and limits on central banks.
In 2022 the value of Japan's currency, the yen, fell by 35% against the US dollar.
Japan's central bank intervened in the currency markets to increase the external value of the yen. This intervention cost the central bank $20.8 billion. Evaluate policies that can be used to prevent a country's exchange rate from depreciating. Refer to a developed country of your choice in your answer.
Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
QS9: Interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical, tabular and numerical forms.
Knowledge, Application and Analysis ( 12 marks) - indicative content
- Understanding of government intervention in the currency markets
Possible policies might include:
- Sale of foreign currency/dollar (or gold) reserves on the foreign exchange market in order to decrease the supply of the yen
- Purchase of domestic currency/yen in order to decrease the supply of the yen and increase the external value of the currency
- Reduction in the money supply in the Japanese economy through reduced asset purchases (ending quantitative easing)
- Increase in the (relative) interest rates in Japan: this will result in greater hot money flows and increase the demand for the yen
- Pegging currency against a more stable currency, e.g. dollar, will fix the exchange rate and prevent further depreciations
- Other policies to encourage inflow of FDI and/or portfolio investment into Japan;
will increase demand for the yen
- Other policies to restrict outflow of funds from Japan (e.g. through remittances, repatriation of profits, capital flight etc.);
will reduce the supply of yen
- Policies to reduce demand for foreign currencies e.g. protectionism
N.B. Award maximum of Level 3 ( 9 marks) if a candidate does not refer to a developed country in their answer
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Displays isolated, superficial or imprecise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Use of generic material or irrelevant information or inappropriate examples. Descriptive approach which has no chains of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Displays elements of knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Limited application of knowledge and understanding to economic problems in context.
A narrow response or superficial, only two-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Level 3
7-9
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to some elements of the question. Some evidence and contextual references are evident in the answer.
Analysis is clear and coherent. Chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident, but they may not be developed fully or some stages are omitted.
Level 4
10-12
Demonstrates accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using appropriate examples which are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question.
Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (8 marks) - indicative content
- Prioritisation/comparison of the effectiveness of different policies
- Significance of the causes discussed: a combination of factors is likely to have a larger impact on the exchange rate - "fell by 35%′′
- Use of monetary policies may cause conflicts with other macroeconomic objectives/policies
- Ability of the government to sell its reserves/dollar depends on the value of reserves/dollar held, and its international value
- Problems of currency stabilisation: depletion of foreign exchange reserves/ foreign currency gap - "cost the Japanese Government $20.8 billion"
- Possible political/ethical issues surrounding the selling of reserves
- Relative interest rate is more important than interest rate in determining hot money flows
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches.
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
7-8
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence, leading to an informed judgement.
Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.