6.1 The Poisson distribution
- Syllabus
- 9709–2028–2029
- Topic
- 6.1
- Level
- A2
If events occur independently at constant mean rate λ per interval, X~Po(λ) and P(X=r)=e^{−λ}λ^r/r!.
Match λ to the interval length, check that events are countable and rare enough for the model, and use complements for “at least one” questions.
If a call centre averages 3 calls per minute, P(2 calls in one minute)=e^{−3}3²/2.
Changing the interval changes λ proportionally; it is not a universal parameter for every time window.
For X~Po(λ), E(X)=λ and Var(X)=λ. For a time or area interval scaled by k, the mean becomes kλ under a constant-rate model.
Use the equality as a model check, not as a statement that every sample has equal mean and variance. Estimate λ from appropriate exposure.
If the observed average is 4 events per hour, a two-hour interval has Po(8), not Po(4).
Sample variance need not equal sample mean exactly; the equality describes the distributional parameter.
| Check | Poisson-model requirement |
|---|---|
| response | a count 0,1,2,… in fixed time, length, area or volume |
| rate | constant average rate over the exposure |
| occurrence | events occur independently |
| simultaneity | in a very small exposure, more than one event is negligible |
If the average is $r$ events per unit exposure, then an exposure of size $t$ usesX\sim Po(rt).
If flaws occur randomly at an average of 0.8 per metre, the number in 5 metres can be modelled by Po(4), provided the rate is stable and flaws do not cluster.
Question the model when the rate varies systematically, one event triggers another, observations are capped by a fixed number of trials, or the exposure itself is unclear. State the modelling assumption when context makes it relevant.
A count variable is not automatically Poisson. The theorem that independent Poisson variables add belongs to linear combinations and does not replace the model-suitability checks here.
For $X\sim B(n,p)$, the syllabus guide isn>50\quad\text{and}\quad np<5(approximately).Whensuitable,useX\approx Y,\qquad Y\sim Po(\lambda),\quad\lambda=np.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | check large n and small p using the stated guide |
| 2 | calculate λ=np |
| 3 | keep the same integer event (=,≤,≥) |
| 4 | calculate with the Poisson formula/table; no continuity correction |
If X∼B(200,0.01), then n>50 and np=2<5, so use Y∼Po(2). Thus P(X≥2)≈P(Y≥2)=1−P(Y=0)−P(Y=1)=1−e−2(1+2).
The approximation replaces many rare independent success opportunities by a random-event count with the same expected value np.
Small p alone is insufficient. Do not use a half-unit continuity correction: both binomial and Poisson variables are discrete.
For $X\sim Po(\lambda)$, when $\lambda$ is large (the syllabus guide is approximately $\lambda>15$), useY\sim N(\lambda,\lambda).Hence the normal standard deviation is $\sqrt{\lambda}$.
| Poisson event | Corrected normal event |
|---|---|
| X≤k | Y<k+0.5 |
| X≥k | Y>k−0.5 |
| a≤X≤b | a−0.5<Y<b+0.5 |
If X∼Po(25), the guide condition holds and Y∼N(25,25). Therefore P(X≥30)≈P(Y>29.5)=P(Z>529.5−25)=P(Z>0.9).
State the large-mean check, write the approximating normal distribution, correct the integer boundary, then standardise with λ.
Do not mix in binomial conditions. For a Poisson variable both normal mean and variance are λ, but the denominator in the z-score is λ.