23.3 Entropy change, ΔS
- Syllabus
- 9701–2028–2029
- Topic
- 23.3
- Level
- A2
Entropy, S, is the number of possible arrangements of the particles and their energy in a given system. More possible arrangements mean higher entropy.
The arrangements include where particles can be and how the system's energy can be distributed. A gas therefore usually has higher entropy than the same amount of the same substance as a liquid or solid because its particles and energy have many more possible arrangements.
S(gas)>S(liquid)>S(solid)for the same substance under comparable conditions
Use the syllabus definition rather than treating entropy as everyday 'messiness'. Entropy is a property of the stated system, so identify its particles, state and conditions before comparing arrangements.
| Change in the system | Sign of ΔS | Particle-and-energy reason |
|---|---|---|
| solid → liquid; liquid → gas | + | particles gain freedom and more arrangements become possible |
| gas → liquid; liquid → solid | − | particles become more constrained |
| solid solute → dilute solution | + | solute particles become dispersed through the solvent |
| crystallisation from solution | − | dispersed particles enter an ordered lattice |
| temperature increases without a phase change | + | energy can be distributed among more accessible energy states |
| temperature decreases | − | fewer energy arrangements are accessible |
| reaction forms more gaseous molecules | + | gas particles have more positional and energy arrangements |
| reaction forms fewer gaseous molecules | − | gas-particle arrangements decrease |
Count gaseous molecules using the balanced-equation coefficients and ignore solid, liquid and aqueous coefficients for this specific gas-count test. For N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) → 2NH₃(g), four gaseous molecules become two, so ΔS is predicted to be negative.
Melting and boiling have positive ΔS; freezing and condensing have negative ΔS. CaCO₃(s) → CaO(s) + CO₂(g) has positive ΔS because gas is produced from solids.
If the number of gaseous molecules is unchanged, gas count alone gives no sign. A qualitative prediction is not a numerical calculation, and a positive ΔS alone does not establish feasibility; Gibbs free energy is treated in 23.4.
ΔS∘=∑νS∘(products)−∑νS∘(reactants)
Use the standard molar entropy for each substance in its stated physical state. Multiply every S° value by its stoichiometric coefficient, total the product side and reactant side separately, then subtract reactants from products.
For 2Mg(s) + O₂(g) → 2MgO(s):
| Substance | S° / J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg(s) | 32.60 | 2 | 65.20 |
| O₂(g) | 205.0 | 1 | 205.0 |
| MgO(s) | 38.20 | 2 | 76.40 |
ΔS∘=(2×38.20)−[(2×32.60)+205.0]=−193.8 J K−1 mol−1
The negative sign agrees with the qualitative change: one mole of gas is consumed and only solids remain. Keep entropy in J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹; do not convert it to kJ until a later equation explicitly requires matching kJ units.
The tabulated quantities are S°, not ΔS° values for individual substances. Do not reverse products minus reactants, omit coefficients, use the wrong physical state, or introduce ΔSsurr; the latter is explicitly not required here.