IB Psychology HL 2.4.6 Research methods Question Bank
Practise IB Psychology SL/HL 2.4.6 by applying research methods concepts to exam-style questions.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2027
- Course
- Psychology HL
- Level
- HL
Practise IB Psychology SL/HL 2.4.6 by applying research methods concepts to exam-style questions.
The stimulus material below describes a study in which the aim was to understand the experiences of European adults who have received mental healthcare. An increasing number of people need treatment for mental health conditions. Examples of treatments include medication and talking therapies, such as counselling. It is important that mental healthcare providers consider the experiences of the people receiving care. The researchers employed interview facilitators in seven European countries. These facilitators were all mental healthcare workers, such as psychologists and mental health nurses. Each facilitator only carried out an interview in their own country. They were all known by their participants. There were 73 participants specifically chosen to take part. They all had experiences with different forms of treatment for a mental health problem. Some participants had paid for care, while others had received it for free, either from a charitable organization or as government- funded care. The length of their treatment had varied from six months to five years. One interview was carried out in each country. Each interview involved between 6 and 12 participants and was carried out in the native language of the country. Every effort was made to create a safe and friendly environment for the interview. The participants were informed about the aims of the study. They all gave permission for the interview to be audio-recorded and signed a consent form. The participants provided information about their age, gender and ethnicity. They also gave details about their mental health condition and the treatment they had received. The researchers wrote an interview guide in English. This was translated into the languages of the non-English speaking countries. The interviews began with general questions about the participants’ experiences. Once everyone felt comfortable sharing, the questions began to focus on the participants’ personal experiences of access to mental healthcare. They were also asked to share their views on the effectiveness and quality of their treatment. Each interview facilitator transcribed their audio-recorded interview and carried out an initial analysis of the transcript. They identified each participant with a unique code. The transcripts and initial analyses were then translated into English and sent to the researchers, who carried out further inductive content analysis. Several themes were identified by the researchers. These included “not knowing where to get help from” and “the importance of receiving help quickly.”
– 3 – 2225 – 5803 Disclaimer: Content used in IB assessments is taken from authentic, third-party sources. The views expressed within them belong to their individual authors and/or publishers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IB. References: Axelsson, M., Schønning, V., Bockting, C. et al. Lived experiences: a focus group pilot study within the MentALLY project of mental healthcare among European users. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05454-5. Source adapted. Licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license: http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/deed.en.
Identify the research method used and outline two characteristics of the method.
Marking guidance:
Award [1] for identification of correct research method: Focus group interview (also accept focus group, group interview).
Award [0] for interview, structured interview, unstructured interview or semi-structured interview.
Answers related to an outline of characteristics of the method may include two of the following characteristics: [1] per relevant point. Maximum of [2].
The characteristic marks are specific to the research method (Focus group interview) rather than the described study.
- A focus group interview is carried out with a small group of participants who all take part in the interview at the same time/together.
- The interviewer acts as a facilitator and encourages the participants to talk openly about topics that are relevant to the research being carried out. The facilitator keeps the conversation focused and brings the group back to the topic if need be.
- Participants usually have something in common and this helps to create a more open and relevant discussion. They can develop their own ideas based on what they hear others sharing.
- The group participants are encouraged to talk amongst themselves rather than to the facilitator.
- A focus group interview provides a natural setting for interactions between participants because participants can use their own language, and it is less artificial than other forms of interview.
- Because of aspects such as the development of ideas and the expression of multiple perspectives, a focus group interview is likely to generate rich data.
- A focus group interview can experience issues related to group dynamics. These include conformity/social desirability bias, some participants sharing less and an unwillingness to share personal information in front of other participants.
The stimulus material below describes a study in which the aim was to understand the experiences of European adults who have received mental healthcare. An increasing number of people need treatment for mental health conditions. Examples of treatments include medication and talking therapies, such as counselling. It is important that mental healthcare providers consider the experiences of the people receiving care. The researchers employed interview facilitators in seven European countries. These facilitators were all mental healthcare workers, such as psychologists and mental health nurses. Each facilitator only carried out an interview in their own country. They were all known by their participants. There were 73 participants specifically chosen to take part. They all had experiences with different forms of treatment for a mental health problem. Some participants had paid for care, while others had received it for free, either from a charitable organization or as government- funded care. The length of their treatment had varied from six months to five years. One interview was carried out in each country. Each interview involved between 6 and 12 participants and was carried out in the native language of the country. Every effort was made to create a safe and friendly environment for the interview. The participants were informed about the aims of the study. They all gave permission for the interview to be audio-recorded and signed a consent form. The participants provided information about their age, gender and ethnicity. They also gave details about their mental health condition and the treatment they had received. The researchers wrote an interview guide in English. This was translated into the languages of the non-English speaking countries. The interviews began with general questions about the participants’ experiences. Once everyone felt comfortable sharing, the questions began to focus on the participants’ personal experiences of access to mental healthcare. They were also asked to share their views on the effectiveness and quality of their treatment. Each interview facilitator transcribed their audio-recorded interview and carried out an initial analysis of the transcript. They identified each participant with a unique code. The transcripts and initial analyses were then translated into English and sent to the researchers, who carried out further inductive content analysis. Several themes were identified by the researchers. These included “not knowing where to get help from” and “the importance of receiving help quickly.”
– 3 – 2225 – 5803 Disclaimer: Content used in IB assessments is taken from authentic, third-party sources. The views expressed within them belong to their individual authors and/or publishers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IB. References: Axelsson, M., Schønning, V., Bockting, C. et al. Lived experiences: a focus group pilot study within the MentALLY project of mental healthcare among European users. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05454-5. Source adapted. Licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license: http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/deed.en.
Suggest one alternative or one additional research method that could be used to investigate the aim of the original study, giving one reason for your choice.
Marking guidance:
Award [1] for naming an alternative or additional research method and up to [2] for reason with rationale.
The candidate may choose to write about an alternative or an additional method. Either approach to answering the question is acceptable. The rationale may differ depending on which is chosen.
If more than one method is suggested, only the first method can be considered for credit.
Suitable alternative or additional research methods and reasons (with rationale) could be, but are not limited to:
Semi-structured interviews
- The aim of this research was to understand the participants experiences of mental healthcare. To get valid information, participants need to be allowed enough freedom to share their subjective experience.
- Although a semi-structured interview is based on an interview guide, it is flexible, and the interviewer can ask participants to elaborate on their answers in follow up questions which could potentially lead to a better understanding of each individual participant's subjective understanding of this topic.
- The semi-structured interview as an additional research method would allow triangulation and could compensate for the limitations of the focus group - such as issues around group dynamics.
Unstructured interviews
- Unstructured interviews do not have a set pattern and questions are not planned in advance. Instead, the questions are based on the participant's previous answers. This allows them to be very informal and flexible.
- Similar to the focus group, an unstructured interview is much like an everyday conversation, creating a relaxed environment where new topics and ideas can flow. It would therefore act as a suitable alternative.
- Unlike the focus group, an unstructured interview is carried out one to one which may avoid issues around group dynamics, for example quieter participants not being given a chance to share.
Surveys
- A survey with closed questions could collect quantitative data on participants' experiences of mental healthcare. This could function as an additional method and provide method triangulation.
- Data from a large-scale survey could add data to the investigation. This would allow for statistical comparisons (between countries or across time).
- Surveys generally allow researchers to collect a large amount of data in a relatively short period and they are less expensive than qualitative methods.
- With a survey it is easy to analyse the data statistically. If the sample is randomized, then the findings can be generalized to a target population.