4.3 Psychology of Social Situations
- Syllabus
- 2025
- Topic
- 4.3
- Level
- —
| Process | Source of influence | Diagnostic feature |
|---|---|---|
| Social norm | A society's expected role or conduct | The behavior follows an expectation for members |
| Normative influence | Desire for acceptance or avoidance of rejection | Public behavior may change to fit the group |
| Informational influence | Belief that others provide useful evidence | Others are treated as a guide to what is correct |
| Conformity | Unspoken group rules, norms, or expectations | Behavior or judgment aligns with peers |
| Obedience | A directive from an authority figure | Compliance follows an explicit authority command |
| Persuasion mechanism | How it works |
|---|---|
| Central route | Careful attention to the quality of arguments |
| Peripheral route | Surface cues influence judgment; the halo effect lets one positive impression shape broader evaluation |
| Foot-in-the-door | Agreement to a small request is followed by a larger request |
| Door-in-the-face | Refusal of a large request is followed by a smaller request |
Conformity concerns peer or group expectations; obedience concerns an authority's directive. Normative influence is about social acceptance, whereas informational influence is about what seems accurate. Persuasion changes ideas, actions, or beliefs through a message or request rather than simply through another person's presence.
| Group effect | What changes |
|---|---|
| Group polarization | Discussion strengthens the group's initial tendency |
| Groupthink | Pressure for agreement weakens critical evaluation |
| Diffusion of responsibility | Each person feels less personally responsible when others are present |
| Social loafing | Individual effort decreases when contribution is less identifiable in a group task |
| Deindividuation | Reduced self-awareness or accountability loosens normal restraints |
| Social facilitation | An audience changes performance of a mental or physical behavior |
| False consensus effect | A person overestimates how widely others share their views |
Individualism, collectivism, and multiculturalism shape how people understand self and others. Across groups, a superordinate goal requires cooperation toward a shared outcome and can reduce negative affect and stereotyping. A social trap has the opposite structure: individuals pursue self-interest and the combined result harms the group.
Industrial-organizational psychologists apply these ideas to work: performance, management practices, relationships among coworkers, and feelings about work such as burnout. The workplace is an application context, not a separate group-bias mechanism.
Group polarization strengthens an initial tendency; groupthink suppresses evaluation to preserve agreement. Diffusion of responsibility concerns felt responsibility, while social loafing concerns reduced effort on a shared task.
| Explanation of helping | Core idea |
|---|---|
| Altruism | Selfless behavior intended to benefit another |
| Social reciprocity norm | People should help those who have helped them, creating an expectation of return or social debt |
| Social responsibility norm | People should help those who depend on or need assistance |
The bystander effect is the reduced likelihood that an individual helps when other potential helpers are present. Situational and attentional variables matter: the person must notice what is happening and interpret it as requiring help, while the presence of others can diffuse responsibility.
If several witnesses each assume someone else will respond, no one may act even though each person would have helped when alone. The group setting changes perceived personal responsibility; it does not prove that every witness lacks concern.
Prosocial behavior describes helping behavior, but it does not by itself prove a purely altruistic motive. A person may help because of reciprocity, responsibility, or another social expectation.