AO1 (2 marks), AO3 (2 marks)
Credit one mark for accurate identification of a strength and a weakness
(AO1)
Credit one mark for justification/exemplification of the strength and the
weakness (AO3)
For example:
Strength.
- Confounding variables are more controlled, as the twins share the
same environment before they are born and very similar
environments after they are born (1), therefore it is a valid way to
determine whether aggression is due to nature or nurture as it has
higher internal validity than some other research methods (1).
Weakness.
- Twin studies often base the identification of a pair of twins as
monozygotic (MZ) or dizygotic (DZ) on similarities in appearance
rather than DNA, which can affect the results on aggression (1),
so may influence the validity of any findings on aggression as
some twins may have been incorrectly labelled as monozygotic
(MZ) or dizygotic (DZ) (1).
Look for other reasonable marking points.
(4)
\begin{tabular}[t]{|l|l|l|}
\hline