P4.1 - Proof

Syllabus
2019
Topic
P4.1
Level
A2

Make an assumption that cannot be true

A proof by contradiction begins by assuming the exact negation of the statement to be proved. If valid deductions from that assumption force an impossibility or conflict with a given condition, the assumption is false and the original statement must be true.

Use four explicit moves: (1) state the contradictory assumption; (2) translate it into algebra, parity, factors or an inequality; (3) derive a named contradiction; (4) reject the assumption and state the original conclusion. For an implication ‘if P, then Q’, assume P is true and Q is false—not merely that P is false.

For 2\sqrt2, assume 2=a/b\sqrt2=a/b where integers a,ba,b have no common factor. Then a2=2b2a^2=2b^2, so aa is even; write a=2ka=2k. Now 4k2=2b24k^2=2b^2, hence b2=2k2b^2=2k^2 and bb is even. Thus aa and bb share factor 2, contradicting lowest terms. Therefore 2\sqrt2 is irrational.

N=p1p2pn+1N=p_1p_2\cdots p_n+1

For infinitely many primes, assume the complete list is p1,,pnp_1,\ldots,p_n and form NN above. Dividing NN by any listed prime leaves remainder 1. Yet N>1N>1 has a prime divisor, which is therefore absent from the supposedly complete list. This contradiction proves that there are infinitely many primes.

The contradiction must follow from the assumption through justified steps; an example that merely fails is not a proof. In unfamiliar problems, useful impossible outcomes include a square being negative, an integer being non-integral, incompatible parity, or a value violating its stated domain.