2.3.4 - National income
- Syllabus
- 2018
- Topic
- 2.3.4
- Level
- AS
The circular flow links households and firms. Households supply factors of production and receive income; they spend on firms' output, creating revenue that funds further production and income.
| Real flow | Money flow in the opposite direction |
|---|---|
| labour, land, capital and enterprise to firms | wages, rent, interest and profit income to households |
| goods and services to households | consumption expenditure to firms |
For the economy, one person's spending is another's income: output, expenditure and income are alternative measures of the same production flow.
The simple two-sector model is a starting point; saving, tax, government, investment and foreign trade add withdrawals and injections.
| Concept | Measurement | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| income | flow received per period | wages, rent, interest, profit and transfers |
| wealth | stock of valuable assets at a point in time, net of relevant liabilities | property, financial assets and savings minus debt |
Income can be consumed or saved; saving adds to wealth. Wealth can generate income or affect consumption through confidence and collateral.
A high income does not guarantee high wealth, and a wealthy household may have low current income. Never add a stock directly to an annual flow.
| Flow | Meaning | Components |
|---|---|---|
| injections | spending entering the domestic income flow beyond household consumption | investment, government expenditure, exports |
| withdrawals (leakages) | income not spent on domestic consumption | saving, taxation, imports |
Net injection is I+G+X−(S+T+M). Its sign indicates whether these flows add to or remove from the circular flow, other things equal.
A withdrawal is not necessarily harmful and an injection is not automatically beneficial; the terms describe direction in the flow, not welfare.
| Injection | Why it enters domestic income |
|---|---|
| investment I | firms purchase capital/inventories, creating revenue and factor income |
| government expenditure G | government purchases domestic goods and services |
| exports X | overseas buyers spend on domestically produced output |
An increase in an injection, with withdrawals unchanged, raises firms' revenue, output and income and can trigger a positive multiplier process.
Government transfers do not enter G directly; they affect the flow when recipients spend. Purchases of imports are not domestic injections.
| Withdrawal | Why it leaves current domestic-consumption flow |
|---|---|
| saving S | disposable income is not currently consumed |
| taxation T | income is transferred to government rather than spent by the private recipient |
| imports M | spending becomes revenue for overseas producers |
An increase in a withdrawal, with injections unchanged, reduces domestic revenue, output and income and can trigger a negative multiplier process.
Tax revenue later spent by government becomes an injection; saving later funding investment can support capacity. Classify the immediate flow before tracing subsequent use.
| Relationship | Pressure on circular flow |
|---|---|
| I+G+X>S+T+M | net injection: income and output tend to expand |
| I+G+X<S+T+M | net withdrawal: income and output tend to contract |
| I+G+X=S+T+M | no planned net change from these flows |
As income changes, saving, tax and imports respond, so withdrawals move until planned injections equal planned withdrawals at a new equilibrium.
Reflationary fiscal policy can raise G or reduce T; deflationary policy can reduce G or raise T. Trade surpluses add net export injection, while deficits create net withdrawal through trade.
Compare totals, not one component alone. Government spending above tax is not sufficient to infer the overall circular-flow balance when saving, investment and trade also differ.
Equilibrium real national output is the level of real output/income at which planned aggregate demand equals planned aggregate supply. In circular-flow terms, planned injections equal planned withdrawals.
If planned expenditure exceeds current output, inventories fall unexpectedly and firms expand production. If output exceeds planned expenditure, inventories accumulate and firms contract production.
Equilibrium means plans are mutually consistent; it does not mean full employment, price stability, fair distribution or maximum welfare.
| Shift, other curve fixed | Price level | Equilibrium real output |
|---|---|---|
| AD right | rises | rises |
| AD left | falls | falls |
| AS right | falls | rises |
| AS left | rises | falls |
Identify the determinant, shift the relevant curve, locate the new intersection and compare both coordinates. Consumption, investment, government expenditure and net exports shift AD; short-run costs or long-run capacity shift AS.
The size of the output response depends on spare capacity and the AS shape. With classical vertical LRAS, an AD shift changes the long-run price level but not potential output.
Do not shift LRAS for a temporary demand change or infer a definite price result when AD and AS shift simultaneously without relative magnitudes.
The multiplier is the ratio of the final change in national income to the initial autonomous injection: k=ΔY/initial injection.
An injection becomes income for workers and firms. They spend a fraction of that extra income, creating another person's income; each round is smaller because saving, tax and imports withdraw part of the addition. The rounds continue until the remaining additions are negligible.
A fall in autonomous spending starts the same chain in reverse, so national income can fall by more than the initial withdrawal.
The multiplier is a process over time, not instant duplication of money. Capacity constraints and price rises can reduce the real-output effect.
| Propensity | Definition for one extra unit of income | Multiplier effect when it rises |
|---|---|---|
| MPC | fraction consumed | increases k |
| MPS | fraction saved | decreases k |
| MPT | fraction paid in tax | decreases k |
| MPM | fraction spent on imports | decreases k |
In a closed simplified model, MPC+MPS=1. With proportional tax/import leakages, MPW=MPS+MPT+MPM and a larger MPW means a smaller multiplier.
Marginal propensities concern the change caused by an additional unit of income, not average shares of total income.
| Information given | Formula |
|---|---|
| MPC in the simplified model | k=1/(1−MPC) |
| marginal withdrawals | MPW=MPS+MPT+MPM then k=1/MPW |
| initial and final income changes | k=ΔY/Δinjection |
If MPC=0.6, then k=1/(1−0.6)=2.5. An initial 4 billion injection gives a final income increase of 2.5×4=10 billion, ceteris paribus.
If k=5, then MPW=1/5=0.2 and, in the simplified MPC formula, MPC=1−0.2=0.8.
The multiplier has no currency or percentage unit. Do not add marginal withdrawals to 1−MPC when using a model in which they are alternative denominator descriptions.
An autonomous change in C, I, G or X−M shifts AD initially. The multiplier process makes the eventual shift in AD and national income larger than the first spending change.
| Conditions | Likely real-activity effect |
|---|---|
| high MPC, low MPS/MPT/MPM and spare capacity | larger multiplier and stronger real-output/employment response |
| high withdrawals or economy near capacity | smaller multiplier, more import leakage or price-level pressure |
| weak confidence, credit constraints or policy delay | spending rounds may be slower or smaller |
The multiplier helps estimate fiscal, investment or export shocks, but estimates vary with the cycle, distribution, openness, tax system and time horizon.
A large nominal-income multiplier need not imply an equally large real-output increase when AS is inelastic and the price level rises.