1.3.4 - Price determination
- Syllabus
- 2018
- Topic
- 1.3.4
- Level
- AS
Market equilibrium occurs at the price where quantity demanded equals quantity supplied. At this price, buyers' planned purchases exactly match sellers' planned sales, determining the equilibrium price and quantity.
| Price | Quantity demanded | Quantity supplied | Market position |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4 | 80 | 40 | excess demand |
| $6 | 60 | 60 | equilibrium |
| $8 | 40 | 80 | excess supply |
On a standard diagram, equilibrium is the intersection of the downward-sloping demand curve and upward-sloping supply curve. Read the price horizontally to the price axis and the quantity vertically to the quantity axis.
Equilibrium means planned demand and supply balance; it does not mean the outcome is fair, socially optimal or permanent. A determinant change can create a new equilibrium.
| Shift, other curve fixed | Equilibrium price | Equilibrium quantity |
|---|---|---|
| demand right | rises | rises |
| demand left | falls | falls |
| supply right | falls | rises |
| supply left | rises | falls |
Identify the non-price determinant, shift the correct curve, keep the other curve fixed unless evidence says it also changes, and locate the new intersection. Then compare both equilibrium price and quantity with their original values.
When demand and supply shift together, one outcome may be certain while the other is ambiguous. Demand right plus supply left must raise price, but quantity may rise, fall or stay unchanged depending on the relative shift sizes. Demand left plus supply right must lower price, while quantity is ambiguous.
Do not infer both outcomes from the direction of one curve when both curves shift. The larger relative shift determines the ambiguous variable.
| Disequilibrium | Condition | Price pressure | Adjustment toward equilibrium |
|---|---|---|---|
| excess demand (shortage) | Qd>Qs | buyers compete and price rises | quantity demanded contracts and quantity supplied extends |
| excess supply (surplus) | Qs>Qd | sellers cut price to clear unsold output | quantity demanded extends and quantity supplied contracts |
Price changes create movements along the existing demand and supply curves. Adjustment continues until planned quantity demanded again equals planned quantity supplied.
If a price is below equilibrium, buyers want 90 units but firms offer 50, leaving excess demand of 40. A rising price reduces purchases and encourages sales until the gap closes.
This mechanism assumes prices can adjust and participants respond. Price controls, slow information, contracts or adjustment costs can delay or prevent market clearing.
| Surplus | Meaning for one unit | Area in a market diagram |
|---|---|---|
| consumer surplus | maximum willingness to pay minus the market price actually paid | below demand and above market price, up to equilibrium quantity |
| producer surplus | market price received minus the minimum price required to supply | above supply and below market price, up to equilibrium quantity |
A buyer willing to pay 10whopays7 receives 3consumersurplus.Asellerwillingtosupplyaunitforatleast4 who receives 7receives3 producer surplus.
Demand represents marginal willingness to pay and supply represents the minimum acceptable price linked to marginal cost. Adding the unit-by-unit gaps gives the total surplus areas.
Producer surplus is not the same as profit: producer surplus subtracts variable production costs represented by supply, whereas profit also accounts for fixed costs.
| Change, other curve fixed | Price/quantity effect | Usual surplus effect |
|---|---|---|
| demand right | price and quantity rise | producer surplus rises; consumer surplus is not determined by price alone because willingness to pay also shifted |
| demand left | price and quantity fall | producer surplus falls; consumer-surplus change needs the new demand area |
| supply right | price falls, quantity rises | consumer surplus rises; producer-surplus change needs the new supply area |
| supply left | price rises, quantity falls | consumer surplus falls; producer-surplus change needs the new supply area |
Draw the original and new curves, mark both equilibria, then compare the complete areas bounded by demand or supply, the relevant price and the traded quantity. Do not compare price alone when the curve defining willingness to pay or minimum supply price has moved.
A good harvest shifts supply right, lowers price and expands quantity, increasing consumer surplus. A fall in demand for hotel rooms shifts demand left and normally reduces producer surplus.
A lower price does not automatically prove total consumer surplus rose if demand also shifted left. Surplus is an area, so both the curve and equilibrium must be considered.
| Function | What a price change does |
|---|---|
| signalling | communicates changes in relative scarcity and consumer preferences to buyers and sellers |
| incentive | a higher potential return encourages producers to extend supply or move resources into production; a lower return discourages them |
| rationing | when a good is scarce, a higher price contracts quantity demanded and allocates available output to buyers willing and able to pay |
If demand rises, excess demand pushes price upward. The higher price signals stronger scarcity, gives firms an incentive to increase output, and rations the limited current supply. These responses help reallocate scarce resources.
Rationing by price reflects willingness and ability to pay, not need or fairness. Signals and incentives can also be weakened by poor information, market power or barriers that prevent resources moving.
| Market scale | Participants and price formation | Important connection |
|---|---|---|
| local | nearby buyers and sellers; local conditions strongly affect price | transport limits, local capacity and local preferences |
| national | buyers and sellers across one country | national regulation, taxes, infrastructure and income |
| global | participants and supply chains across countries | exchange rates, trade costs, weather, geopolitics and world demand/supply |
The same signalling, incentive and rationing functions operate at each scale. A higher world cocoa price signals scarcity to producers internationally, while a local hotel price mainly coordinates rooms and visitors in that location.
Markets can overlap: a global commodity-price change alters national import costs and then local retail prices. The relevant market is defined by the product, geography and participants able to substitute or trade.
A market's label does not guarantee one uniform price. Quality, transport, taxes, exchange rates and imperfect information can create price differences within and across scales.
| Tax type | Charge | Supply representation |
|---|---|---|
| specific | fixed amount per unit | parallel upward/left shift by the tax per unit |
| ad valorem | percentage of selling price | upward/left pivot because tax per unit grows with price |
An indirect tax raises producers' cost of supplying each unit. The consumer price rises, the net price producers receive falls, and equilibrium quantity falls. The vertical wedge between the two prices is the tax per unit; multiplying it by post-tax quantity gives government tax revenue.
| Stakeholder | Likely impact |
|---|---|
| consumers | higher price, lower quantity and lower consumer surplus |
| producers | lower net receipt, lower sales and lower producer surplus |
| government | tax revenue, but administration and opportunity costs |
| third parties | possible reduction in external costs if harmful consumption/production falls |
The tax does not normally shift demand. Its effectiveness and stakeholder effects depend on tax size, PED, PES, substitutes, enforcement and time; tax revenue is not automatically a net social benefit.
Tax incidence is the division of the tax burden between consumers and producers. Consumer incidence is the rise in the price paid; producer incidence is the fall in the net price received. Together they equal the tax per unit.
| Relative responsiveness | Larger tax burden |
|---|---|
| demand less elastic than supply | consumers |
| supply less elastic than demand | producers |
| perfectly inelastic demand | consumers bear all |
| perfectly inelastic supply | producers bear all |
The side less able to change quantity after the tax has fewer avoidance options, so bears more of the wedge. Statutory responsibility—who sends the payment to government—does not determine economic incidence.
Do not measure incidence from the tax-revenue rectangle alone. Compare the pre-tax equilibrium price with the post-tax consumer price and producer receipt, using the same per-unit vertical wedge.
A production subsidy is a government payment that lowers producers' effective cost and encourages production. Supply shifts right/down; the price consumers pay falls, the price producers receive including subsidy rises, and equilibrium quantity increases.
The vertical difference between the producer receipt and consumer price is the subsidy per unit. Multiplying this wedge by the post-subsidy quantity gives government expenditure.
| Stakeholder | Likely impact |
|---|---|
| consumers | lower price, higher quantity and higher consumer surplus |
| producers | higher effective receipt, larger sales and higher producer surplus |
| government | expenditure and an opportunity cost |
| third parties | possible external benefits, or external costs if extra output is harmful |
The effect depends on subsidy size, PED, PES, time lags and whether firms pass benefits through. Support may build capacity or correct underconsumption, but can cause dependency, overproduction or government failure.
Removing a subsidy reverses the direction: supply shifts left, consumer price rises and quantity falls. A subsidy is not free resources; taxpayers or foregone public spending finance it.
Subsidy incidence divides the per-unit subsidy between consumers and producers. Consumer incidence is the fall in the price consumers pay; producer incidence is the rise in the effective price producers receive. Together they equal the subsidy per unit.
| Relative responsiveness | Larger share of subsidy benefit |
|---|---|
| demand less elastic than supply | consumers gain more through a lower price |
| supply less elastic than demand | producers gain more through a higher effective receipt |
| perfectly inelastic demand | consumers receive the full price benefit |
| perfectly inelastic supply | producers receive the full benefit |
As with tax incidence, the less responsive side captures more because it changes quantity less and has fewer alternatives. Legal payment to producers does not imply producers retain the full benefit.
Incidence is not the same as total government spending. Government expenditure is subsidy per unit multiplied by post-subsidy quantity; incidence divides each unit's wedge between the two sides.