Practical Skills in Chemistry A2 II
- Syllabus
- 2017
- Topic
- —
- Level
- A2
| Move | Practical question to answer |
|---|---|
| identify | What is changed, measured or observed, and what chemical system is present? |
| model | Which equation, equilibrium, rate law, redox change or intermolecular interaction applies? |
| connect | How does that model change the measured quantity or visible observation under the stated conditions? |
| answer | State the predicted direction, value or observation, with units and a chemical reason. |
Keep observations separate from explanations. 'Brown fumes form', 'the solution turns green', 'the temperature falls' and 'effervescence occurs' are observations; naming the species or process responsible is the inference. If asked what is seen, do not replace visible evidence with 'a gas is produced'.
Use only information relevant to the actual setup. Check limiting reagents, state, concentration, temperature, time and apparatus before transferring a familiar rule to an unfamiliar practical.
A remembered reaction is not enough if its required conditions are absent. The conclusion must follow from the stated practical conditions and predict what the instrument or observer would actually detect.
| Variable role | Meaning | How to state it |
|---|---|---|
| independent | deliberately changed | name the value and planned range |
| dependent | measured response | name the measurement and unit |
| control | another factor that could affect the response | name it and give a concrete method/value that keeps it constant |
When investigating how concentration affects rate, concentration is independent and time or initial rate is dependent. Keep temperature constant with a thermostated bath, total volume constant by adjusting water, and the same quantities and surface area of other reactants. Use the same endpoint rule and mixing procedure each run.
Control choices come from the chemical model: temperature changes the rate constant, total volume changes concentrations, and particle size changes available surface area. State why each uncontrolled factor would change the dependent variable.
Writing 'keep it the same' or 'make it a fair test' is incomplete. A valid control names the variable, how it is held constant and, where useful, why it could otherwise confound the conclusion.
| Data | Appropriate presentation |
|---|---|
| measured values and repeats | table with independent variable first, headings as quantity / unit, consistent decimal places |
| qualitative evidence | exact colour, state, precipitate, gas or temperature observation; do not record the inferred identity as the observation |
| continuous relationship | scatter/line graph with uncertainties or anomalies retained |
| categories | bar chart only when categories, not a continuous numerical variable, are compared |
Record raw readings before derived values. For a burette, retain initial and final readings as well as titre; for repeated data, show all trials, identify any justified exclusion and calculate a mean from the retained values. Match decimal places to the instrument resolution.
Give units once in the heading, not after every entry. Use chemical symbols, state labels and significant figures consistently so another person can reconstruct every calculation from the table.
Do not silently delete an anomalous reading or round raw data to make repeats agree. Presentation preserves evidence; evaluation decides what, if anything, should be excluded.
| Check | Evidence-based question |
|---|---|
| pattern | Do repeats and the best-fit trend support the claimed direction or relationship? |
| range | Is the conclusion interpolation inside measured values, or uncertain extrapolation beyond them? |
| scatter | Is variation small enough to distinguish the proposed effect? |
| anomaly | Is there a defensible procedural or chemical reason to exclude a point? |
| chemistry | Do competing reactions, equilibrium, incomplete reaction or loss explain deviation? |
State the relationship and its boundary, then quote data or graph features that support it. Compare an experimental value with a reference only after applying uncertainty. A value inside the uncertainty interval is consistent with the reference; that does not prove the method is error-free.
A yield below 100% can arise from incomplete reaction, side reactions, transfer loss, product remaining dissolved or loss during purification. Identify the stage and direction rather than writing only 'human error'.
Correlation within a narrow range does not prove a mechanism or justify extrapolation. Separate what the results show from the chemical explanation proposed for the pattern.
\text{percentage uncertainty}=\frac{\text{absolute uncertainty}}{\text{measured value}}\times100%
| Effect | Signature | Response |
|---|---|---|
| random variation | repeats scatter on both sides | repeat, average and improve resolution/control |
| systematic error | readings shift consistently in one direction | calibrate, blank-correct or change the biased method |
| anomalous result | one value is inconsistent with the pattern | investigate and exclude only with a stated reason |
For a difference between two readings, include uncertainty from both readings; a burette titre therefore contains two reading uncertainties. For multiplication or division, add percentage uncertainties as the conservative course method. Larger measured quantities give smaller percentage uncertainty when absolute uncertainty is fixed.
If a 25.00cm3 pipette has absolute uncertainty ±0.06cm3, its percentage uncertainty is 0.06/25.00imes100=0.24%. Report an uncertainty with its unit or as a percentage, not as an unlabelled number.
Repeats reduce uncertainty in a mean caused by random variation, but they do not remove a calibration offset or a consistent endpoint bias.
| Criterion | Diagnostic question |
|---|---|
| validity | Does the measurement isolate the intended relationship or chemical amount? |
| reliability | Would repeats under the same method agree? |
| accuracy | Is there bias from loss, incomplete transfer, endpoint or calibration? |
| sensitivity | Is the change large compared with resolution and background variation? |
| safety/practicality | Can the procedure control heat, pressure, vapour and timing consistently? |
Write each comment as: specific feature → effect on result → improvement. For immiscible reactants, continuous stirring increases contact; for a reaction sampled over time, rapid quenching fixes the composition at the sampling time; when one reagent is deliberately in excess, its exact volume may not control calculated moles.
Where possible, predict the direction of error. Continued reaction before titration can increase product measured; loss of product during transfer lowers yield; dilution may change concentration without changing moles.
Generic advice such as 'repeat', 'be more careful' or 'use better apparatus' earns no causal conclusion. Name the weakness and show why the proposed change addresses it.
| Feature | Requirement |
|---|---|
| axes | independent variable on x, dependent on y; quantity and unit on each |
| scale | linear unless stated, simple intervals, data occupying at least half the grid |
| points | small accurate crosses; retain anomalies |
| fit | straight line or smooth curve representing the trend, not point-to-point joins |
\text{gradient}=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}
Use a large triangle on a straight best-fit line, not two raw points unless they lie suitably on the line. For an instantaneous rate, draw a tangent at the specified time and calculate its gradient. Read an intercept or intersection with units and sensible precision.
Interpolation uses the supported data range; extrapolation is less secure. A curved graph has a changing gradient, so quote the position at which a tangent was taken.
A best-fit line need not pass through the origin unless the model and uncertainty justify it. Do not force an anomalous point onto the trend or use a tiny gradient triangle.
| Stage | Check |
|---|---|
| convert | put volumes in dm3, temperatures in K and time in the required unit |
| calculate | show the defining equation, substitute values with units, preserve guard digits |
| transform | use stoichiometric ratios, dilution factors, logarithms or reciprocals only when the model requires them |
| analyse | calculate mean, gradient, percentage yield/error or uncertainty and interpret chemically |
| report | round once at the end with units and justified significant figures |
n=cV\qquad \text{rate}=\frac{\Delta\text{quantity}}{\Delta t}\qquad %\text{yield}=\frac{\text{actual}}{\text{theoretical}}\times100
Label intermediate quantities so mole ratios and scale factors can be checked. When a graph is required, show the construction on the graph; when a result comes from a calibration line, do not read beyond the calibrated range without flagging extrapolation.
A calculator display is not an analysis. The method, units, direction and chemical meaning of the processed value must remain visible.
Carry extra digits through intermediate calculations and round only the final result. For multiplication and division, the least precise measured input usually limits the final significant figures; follow any explicit instruction in the question. Exact stoichiometric coefficients and defined conversion factors do not limit precision.
| Value | Significant figures | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 0.00450 | 3 | leading zeros locate the decimal; trailing zero is measured |
| 25.00 | 4 | both trailing zeros show burette/pipette precision |
| 1500 | ambiguous | use 1.50imes103 to state 3 significant figures |
Round an absolute uncertainty sensibly, then round the measured value to the same decimal place: for example, 12.347±0.062g becomes about 12.35±0.06g. Keep raw table readings at the instrument's consistent decimal places.
Decimal places and significant figures are different. Premature rounding can shift a final result, while reporting many calculator digits claims unsupported precision.
| Idea | Meaning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| accuracy | closeness to the accepted or true value | reference comparison, recovery, calibration or valid standard |
| precision | closeness of repeated measurements to one another | small spread/range or small standard deviation |
| repeatability | same operator, method and equipment give similar results | repeat series under unchanged conditions |
| reproducibility | different operators or equipment give similar results | independent repeat under changed laboratory conditions |
Precise but inaccurate results cluster away from the accepted value, often from systematic bias. Accurate but imprecise results scatter around the accepted value, often from random variation. Results may be both, either or neither.
Improve precision by controlling conditions and using finer-resolution apparatus; improve accuracy by calibration, blank correction, complete transfer and a method that measures the intended quantity. Compare differences with combined uncertainty before claiming disagreement.
More significant figures do not create accuracy or precision. They only change how a value is written; evidence comes from method, resolution, repeats and reference comparison.
| Task | Suitable apparatus | Why |
|---|---|---|
| deliver one fixed accurate volume | volumetric pipette + filler | calibrated fixed volume |
| deliver a measured variable volume | burette | fine scale and controlled dropwise delivery |
| prepare an exact solution volume | volumetric flask | single calibration mark |
| measure an approximate volume | measuring cylinder | faster, but less precise |
| collect gas volume | gas syringe | direct volume reading without gas loss when sealed correctly |
| collect crystals rapidly | Büchner funnel, flat filter paper, side-arm flask and vacuum | reduced-pressure filtration |
| measure mass | balance with suitable capacity/resolution | direct difference by weighing |
Check that the expected value lies within the instrument range, the resolution makes percentage uncertainty acceptable, and the material tolerates heat, pressure and reagent. Choose a thermometer/probe whose range covers the whole change, not merely the starting value.
A familiar item is not automatically suitable: a measuring cylinder cannot replace a volumetric pipette for an accurate aliquot, and a round-bottomed flask is unsafe for suction filtration.
| Technique | Critical actions |
|---|---|
| volumetric solution | quantitative transfer with washings, dissolve, make to mark at eye level, stopper and invert repeatedly |
| titration | rinse burette with titrant and pipette with analyte, remove funnel, read meniscus at eye level, swirl and add dropwise near endpoint |
| reflux/distillation | condenser water enters bottom; apparatus remains open; thermometer bulb is at still-head entrance for distillation |
| suction filtration | flat wet filter paper seals a perforated Büchner funnel on a side-arm flask connected to vacuum |
| weighing | use difference when transferring solids and never weigh a hot object |
In a permanganate titration, add KMnOX4 from the burette and approach the endpoint dropwise while swirling; the first permanent pale-pink colour is the endpoint. Wash flask walls with deionised water because this changes volume but not analyte moles.
Technique details are functional, not ceremonial: a sealed heated apparatus can pressurise, water entering the condenser top leaves air pockets, and missing quantitative washings lose analyte.
Range is the interval of values an instrument can measure. Resolution is the smallest change its scale or display can distinguish. Select the smallest practical range that still contains every expected reading, because this often provides finer resolution and smaller percentage uncertainty.
%\text{ uncertainty}=\frac{\text{reading uncertainty}}{\text{measured quantity}}\times100
| Scenario | Better choice | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| about 24.8cm3 delivered | 50 cm³ burette with 0.1 cm³ graduations | adequate range and fine resolution |
| 250.0cm3 standard solution | 250.0 cm³ volumetric flask | exact target lies at calibration mark |
| temperature expected 20-85 °C | probe covering at least that interval | prevents out-of-range clipping |
For an analogue scale, reading uncertainty is commonly related to half the smallest division; for a digital instrument, use the stated manufacturer uncertainty or display convention. Apply the actual uncertainty supplied in the question when one is given.
A wider range is not automatically better. It may reduce resolution, while very fine resolution is useless if the expected value exceeds the instrument range.
| Hazard/exposure | Matched control |
|---|---|
| corrosive splash | microscale quantities, controlled addition, eye protection and suitable gloves |
| toxic or volatile fumes | closed transfer where possible and a functioning fume cupboard |
| flammable liquid/vapour | remove ignition sources; use an electric heater or water bath |
| strongly exothermic reaction | slow addition, stirring and external cooling with temperature monitoring |
| pressure from gas/heating | keep vent path open, vent separating funnel away from people, never heat a sealed system |
| oxidising/heavy-metal waste | segregated labelled collection and approved disposal |
Hazard is the inherent capacity to cause harm; risk combines severity with likelihood and exposure. Read the supplied hazard data, identify the route—skin, eyes, inhalation, ingestion, fire or pressure—then state how the control interrupts it.
For concentrated nitric acid and nitrogen dioxide, acid-resistant handling controls corrosive contact while a fume cupboard controls toxic gas inhalation. These are different hazards requiring different controls.
A laboratory coat and spectacles are baseline protection, not a complete risk assessment. Do not propose a mask, flame or glove without showing that it addresses the named hazard.
| Gas | Confirmatory observation |
|---|---|
| HX2 | squeaky pop with a lighted splint |
| OX2 | relights a glowing splint |
| COX2 | limewater turns milky |
| NHX3 | damp red litmus turns blue; white fumes with HCl |
| ClX2 | bleaches damp litmus after initially turning it red |
| SOX2 | acidified dichromate turns orange to green |
| Ion/test | Observation |
|---|---|
| NHX4X+ + warm NaOH | ammonia evolved |
| COX3X2− + dilute acid | COX2 effervescence |
| SOX4X2− + dilute HCl then BaClX2 | white BaSOX4 |
| ClX−/BrX−/IX− + dilute HNOX3 then AgNOX3 | white/cream/yellow precipitate; differing ammonia solubility |
| FeX2X+/FeX3X+/CuX2X+ + OHX− | green/brown/blue hydroxide precipitate; Fe(OH)X2 browns in air |
| flame tests | Li crimson, Na yellow, K lilac, Ca orange-red, Ba apple-green, Cu blue-green |
Use fresh portions, correct acidification and sufficient reagent. Record observation first, then inference and, when requested, a net ionic equation with charge and atoms balanced.
Precipitate colour alone is not an identity. Reagent order, acid choice, excess reagent, gas confirmation and competing ions determine whether the inference is valid.
| Functional group | Reagent/condition | Positive observation |
|---|---|---|
| C=C | bromine water | decolourises |
| alcohol / carboxylic acid O-H | PClX5, dry conditions | misty HCl fumes |
| oxidisable alcohol/aldehyde | acidified dichromate, warm | orange to green |
| carbonyl | 2,4-DNPH | yellow/orange precipitate |
| aldehyde | Tollens' reagent, warm | silver mirror/precipitate |
| methyl carbonyl or CHX3CH(OH)X− | iodine in alkali, warm | pale-yellow CHIX3 |
| carboxylic acid | carbonate/hydrogencarbonate | COX2 effervescence |
| phenol | bromine water | decolourises and white 2,4,6-tribromophenol precipitate |
| amine | water/universal indicator | alkaline solution; characteristic ligand/base tests where specified |
Choose tests that separate the remaining candidates and use fresh portions to avoid reagent carry-over. A 2,4-DNPH result finds a carbonyl; Tollens' then distinguishes an aldehyde from a ketone. A negative result is useful only when conditions and reagent quality were valid.
PClX5 detects an O-H-containing group but does not by itself distinguish an alcohol from a carboxylic acid. Bromine-water decolourisation can have different causes, so combine tests and structural evidence.
| Experiment | Data route | Method audit |
|---|---|---|
| titration | concordant titres → mean → n=cV → stoichiometry | endpoint, quantitative transfer, burette/pipette uncertainty |
| thermochemical | corrected ΔT → q=mcΔT → molar ΔH | heat loss, calorimeter absorption, incomplete combustion/reaction |
| equilibrium | equilibrium concentrations → stated K expression | temperature control, equilibration, sampling not disturbing system |
| kinetics | concentration/volume-time data → initial rate or rate constant | mixing/timing delay, temperature, endpoint and tangent/fit |
Preserve the distinction between the directly measured quantity and the desired chemical quantity. Every conversion needs an equation, unit and assumption; every evaluation should identify which assumption the method may violate.
Use repeats and uncertainty to judge differences, not appearance alone. Improve the dominant limitation: better insulation for calorimetry, a larger titre for lower percentage uncertainty, rapid quenching for timed samples, or a thermostated bath for rates/equilibria.
The same improvement is not universal. Repeating reduces random scatter but cannot recover heat already lost, fix a biased endpoint or restore an equilibrium disturbed during sampling.
| Stage | Inorganic preparation | Organic preparation |
|---|---|---|
| reaction | choose stoichiometric/excess reagent and control pH/temperature | choose reagent, catalyst, reflux or controlled addition |
| isolate | filter precipitate or remove excess insoluble solid | separate layers, extract, wash, distil or filter crystals |
| purify | wash and recrystallise where suitable | dry liquid then distil, or recrystallise solid |
| verify | mass, composition or characteristic test | boiling/melting range, spectrum or functional-group test |
| evaluate | yield, purity, losses and waste | yield, purity, side reactions, solvent and safety |
Track material at every transfer. Use washings for quantitative transfer, cold wash solvent to limit product loss, an ice-water bath for full surface contact, and a desiccator rather than an oven when heat could melt or decompose the solid.
%\text{ yield}=\frac{\text{moles or mass of dry product obtained}}{\text{theoretical product from limiting reagent}}\times100
Explain a low yield by the actual stage—incomplete reaction, side reaction, mechanical transfer, product solubility or purification loss. Explain purity with an independent measurement, not yield alone.
A high wet mass can give an apparent yield above 100% while indicating retained solvent or impurity. Drying, yield and purity are separate claims requiring separate evidence.