26.1 Rate equations, orders and rate constants
- Syllabus
- 9701–2028–2029
- Topic
- 26.1
- Level
- A2
| Term | Precise meaning |
|---|---|
| rate equation | experimentally determined relationship between rate and reactant concentrations |
| order with respect to A | power of [A] in the rate equation |
| overall order | sum of all concentration powers |
| rate constant, k | proportionality constant for a fixed reaction at a stated temperature |
| half-life, t₁/₂ | time for a reactant concentration to fall to half its value |
| rate-determining step | slow step that controls the observed rate |
| intermediate | species made in one mechanism step and consumed in a later step |
rate=k[A]2[B]⇒second order in A, first order in B, third order overall
Orders come from rate evidence, not coefficients in the overall equation. An intermediate cancels from the summed mechanism, and the rate-determining step is not automatically the first step.
| Evidence when [A] changes | Order in A | Rate–[A] graph | Concentration–time clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| rate unchanged | 0 | horizontal | straight decrease while zero-order conditions hold |
| rate changes by same factor | 1 | straight through origin | constant successive half-lives |
| rate changes by square of factor | 2 | upward curve | successive half-lives increase |
| Experiment | [A] / mol dm⁻³ | [B] / mol dm⁻³ | Initial rate / mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 2.00 × 10⁻³ |
| 2 | 0.200 | 0.100 | 8.00 × 10⁻³ |
| 3 | 0.100 | 0.200 | 2.00 × 10⁻³ |
Comparing 1→2, doubling [A] quadruples rate, so m = 2. Comparing 1→3, doubling [B] leaves rate unchanged, so n = 0.
rate=k[A]2[B]0=k[A]2
k=(0.100)22.00×10−3=0.200 dm3 mol−1 s−1;[A]=0.150⇒rate=4.50×10−3 mol dm−3 s−1
Compare experiments where only one concentration changes. A concentration–time gradient gives instantaneous rate; its curved shape alone does not identify order without the appropriate half-life or rate–concentration evidence.
t1/2=k0.693
At fixed temperature, k is constant, so every halving takes the same time even though the concentration and instantaneous rate both decrease. Constant successive half-lives are therefore evidence of first-order behaviour.
| Time elapsed | [A] from 0.800 mol dm⁻³ when t₁/₂ = 10.0 s |
|---|---|
| 0 s | 0.800 |
| 10 s | 0.400 |
| 20 s | 0.200 |
| 30 s | 0.100 |
[A]t=[A]0(21)t/t1/2
Constant half-life does not mean constant rate, and concentration-independent half-life is not a general rule for zero- or second-order reactions.
| Evidence supplied | Calculation route |
|---|---|
| initial rate and established orders | k = rate/([A]ᵐ[B]ⁿ) |
| first-order half-life | k = 0.693/t₁/₂ |
rate=k[A][B];k=(0.0250)(0.0125)4.38×10−6=1.40×10−2 dm3 mol−1 s−1
t1/2=10.0 min=600 s;k=6000.693=1.16×10−3 s−1
Choose k units so that the rate equation yields mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹. Zero-, first-, second- and third-overall-order equations therefore have different k units.
Determine order before calculating k. The 0.693/t₁/₂ relationship applies only to first-order reactions, and time units set the reciprocal-time unit of k.
For 2NO(g) + O₂(g) → 2NO₂(g), consider a fast equilibrium followed by a slow step.
2NONX2OX2fast equilibrium
NX2OX2+OX22NOX2slow rate-determining step
The slow step gives rate ∝ [N₂O₂][O₂]. The preceding equilibrium makes [N₂O₂] proportional to [NO]², so substitution gives rate = k[NO]²[O₂]. Adding the two steps cancels N₂O₂ and reproduces the overall equation.
| Species pattern across steps | Identity |
|---|---|
| formed then consumed; absent overall | intermediate (N₂O₂ here) |
| consumed then regenerated; absent overall | catalyst |
A proposed mechanism is consistent only if its summed steps give the overall reaction and its rate-determining logic gives the observed rate equation. The same checks can identify which listed step is rate determining.
Do not leave an intermediate in the observable rate equation without a supplied relationship that eliminates it, and do not infer mechanism solely from overall stoichiometric coefficients.
Raising temperature changes the energy distribution → a larger fraction of particles has energy at least equal to the activation energy → a larger fraction of collisions can react → the rate constant k increases → rate increases at the same concentrations.
The fraction beyond the activation-energy threshold can grow substantially even for a modest temperature rise, so k and rate may increase much more than collision frequency alone would suggest.
For one reaction, k is constant only at a specified temperature. Concentration appears separately in the rate equation; changing concentration changes rate without changing k when temperature and catalyst are unchanged.
Temperature does more than make particles move faster: the crucial kinetic effect is the increased fraction able to overcome Ea. A catalyst changes the available pathway and Ea rather than acting as a temperature increase.