IB Economics SL 2.7 Role of government in microeconomics Question Bank

Study the extract below and answer the questions that follow.
Taxes on junk food and sugary drinks

(1) Some countries are considering indirect taxes on junk food or sugary drinks to reduce their consumption and increase government tax revenues. Over-consumption of goods with a high fat or sugar content has negative externalities, because it leads to obesity, serious health problems and additional health care costs. The principle behind such taxes is the same as taxes imposed on cigarettes and alcohol. These taxes are known as "fat taxes".

(2) In the United Kingdom (UK), discussions focus on a tax on processed foods, snacks and sugary drinks. Another possibility would be to impose a tax on full-fat milk, butter and cheese, in order to induce consumers to switch to less fattening substitute products with a lower fat content. Foods with a high fat content are linked to heart disease and premature death.

(3) In the United States, some states are considering imposing a tax on sugary drinks to raise funds for health care. Denmark already has a tax on these drinks and is planning a new tax on some high-fat dairy products.

(4) However, research indicates that such taxes would have a disproportionately large effect on low income households. One reason is that low income individuals tend to consume a larger amount of foods with a high fat content because these are cheaper. This is an important reason why low income individuals tend to be less healthy than wealthier people. It has also been argued that low income individuals respond to higher food prices by eating smaller quantities of healthy food.

(5) Food manufacturers have been angered by the idea of a "fat tax", arguing that the public would rebel against it.

(6) Studies have shown that the demand for most categories of foods and beverages is price inelastic. According to a representative of the Food and Drink Federation in the UK, "the fat tax may be a perfectly sensible issue to debate, but such a regressive taxation policy would reduce the purchasing power of consumers". He argues that it would be better if food manufacturers voluntarily improved their products. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC280464; and
http://www.humanevents.com/2010/07/06/hard-truths-about-soda-taxes/
]

Study the extract below and answer the questions that follow.
EU court rules minimum price for cigarettes illegal

(1) The European Court of Justice has ruled that Ireland cannot impose a minimum price on cigarettes. It said that member countries would have to find other ways to combat smoking. This could be achieved by increasing indirect tax on tobacco, but imposing a minimum price would distort fair competition in the market. The ruling is designed to maintain the freedom of manufacturers and importers to benefit from lower costs and greater efficiency.

(2) The judgment said the aim of ensuring that tobacco prices are high can be "adequately" achieved by increasing tax, since any indirect tax rises are, sooner or later, reflected in an increased retail price, without removing the freedom of manufacturers to set prices.

(3) The Irish government had claimed that it needed to fix a high minimum price to discourage smoking. This followed government legislation to ban tobacco advertising and promotion in July 2009. According to a spokesperson from the anti-smoking group ASH (Action on Smoking and Health), this measure helped to prevent retail outlets from making young people feel attracted to buying cigarettes. "Close to 30 % of our population still smoke and 7000 die from tobacco-related disease each year," he said.

(4) It has been argued that increasing the price of cigarettes is one of the most effective ways of curbing harmful smoking and there is a need to make cigarettes less appealing, particularly to young people. The evidence is that banning advertising, introducing minimum pricing and increasing health warnings can all work.

(5) The head of a major retail organization has attacked the idea of minimum pricing for cigarettes. He argued that artificially fixing a minimum price would not be effective. Also, since the demand for tobacco is inelastic, raising the price would not work. Moreover, it was against the free market for a government to set prices for any product available to consumers, limiting their freedom to choose.