Question 1
Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process.
Refer to the paper 1 section B assessment criteria when awarding marks.
The command term "evaluate" requires that candidates address the strengths and limitations of one theory demonstrating the influence of emotion on one cognitive process. Although a discussion of both strengths and limitations is required, it does not have to be evenly balanced to gain high marks.
Responses may focus on any cognitive process that is affected by emotion, such as intelligence, perception, memory or decision-making.
Examples of theories include, but are not limited to:
- Brown and Kulik's flashbulb memory theory
- Bower's theory of state-dependent cues
- Frank's emotional precommitment model of decision making
- Loftus on weapon focus
- intrusive memory theory.
Evaluation of the selected theory includes, but is not limited to:
- degree of empirical support
- methodological considerations
- contrary findings or explanations
- involvement of biological or social factors
- accuracy and clarity of the concepts
- application of the theory.
If a candidate evaluates more than one theory, credit should be given only to the first evaluation, unless the other theory or theories are clearly used to evaluate the main theory;
for example, used to illustrate the strengths and/or limitations of the main theory.
If a candidate evaluates one theory as it relates to more than one cognitive process, credit should be given only to the discussion of the first cognitive process.
If a candidate discusses only strengths or only limitations, the response should be awarded up to a maximum of [5 marks] for criterion B, critical thinking, and up to a maximum of [2 marks] for criterion C, organization. Up to full marks may be awarded for criterion A, knowledge and comprehension.