EduNinja
IB Biology SL/Notes/D4.2 Stability and change

IB Biology SLD4.2 Stability and changeNotes

Define Ecosystem Stability

Ecosystem stability means a community can remain recognizable over long timescales even while local populations fluctuate. Ancient forests, deserts, and long-lived communities show that stability is not the absence of change; it is persistence of structure and function despite normal variation.

Some ecosystems remain stable over long timescales despite local fluctuations.
Ancient forests, deserts, and long-lived communities provide evidence of stability.
Stability means persistence, not zero change.

Which statement best defines ecosystem stability?

Choose

Use the Stability Requirements Test

Stable ecosystems need several supports working together. Energy input powers food webs, nutrient cycling keeps materials available, biodiversity and genetic diversity spread risk, and abiotic conditions must stay within tolerance ranges for key species. If one support fails, stability can weaken.

Stability requires energy input, nutrient cycling, biodiversity, and genetic diversity.
Abiotic conditions must remain within tolerance ranges for key species.
Biodiversity and genetic diversity increase resilience.

Match each stability requirement to its role.

Match
Reasons
0/4

Explain the Amazon Tipping Point

Amazon forest stability depends partly on the forest making its own wet conditions. Deforestation reduces transpiration, rainfall recycling, and regional cooling. If enough forest is lost, reduced rainfall and higher temperature can push rainforest toward a savanna-like tipping point.

Amazon deforestation reduces transpiration, rainfall recycling, and regional cooling.
Loss of forest can push rainforest toward savanna-like tipping points.
A tipping point is a threshold where feedback makes recovery harder.

The tipping-point risk is about losing enough forest that rainfall recycling can no longer maintain rainforest conditions.

Order the Amazon tipping-point chain.

Order
1
forest is removed
2
drying stress increases
3
transpiration decreases
4
rainfall recycling and cooling decrease
5
rainforest can shift toward savanna-like state

Order the Amazon tipping-point chain.

Choose
forest is removed
transpiration decreases
rainfall recycling and cooling decrease
drying stress increases
rainforest can shift toward savanna-like state

Design a Mesocosm Test

Mesocosms are small model ecosystems used to test stability under controlled conditions. A closed bottle restricts matter exchange, so nutrients and gases must cycle inside. Light can still enter as an energy input. Good mesocosm answers mention what is controlled, what is measured, and what limitation the model has.

Mesocosms model ecosystem stability under controlled experimental conditions.
Closed bottle systems restrict matter exchange but allow light energy input.
They are useful models but smaller and simpler than real ecosystems.

A mesocosm is useful only if one variable changes and the control stays comparable.

Sort each feature of a closed bottle mesocosm.

Sort
Unsorted
4
Allowed/controlled input
0
Restricted exchange
0
Measured stability evidence
0

Sort each feature of a closed bottle mesocosm.

Choose
light energy
matter entering or leaving
population survival over time
oxygen/carbon dioxide balance

Predict a Trophic Cascade

A keystone species has a disproportionate effect on community structure. Removing it can change populations at several trophic levels, called a trophic cascade. The exam chain is: keystone species removed, one population changes, feeding pressure changes, and community structure becomes less stable.

Keystone species have disproportionate effects on community structure.
Removal can trigger trophic cascades and ecosystem instability.
Explain the cascade through feeding links, not just “everything changes.”

Order a trophic cascade after keystone removal.

Order
1
keystone species is removed
2
community structure changes
3
ecosystem stability decreases
4
its prey/competitor changes in abundance
5
feeding pressure shifts at another trophic level

Judge Sustainable Harvest

Sustainable harvesting removes biomass at or below the replacement rate. If harvest exceeds recovery, the population or stock declines. Managed plant harvests and marine fish stocks need monitoring because the safe harvest rate depends on population recovery, reproduction, and changing conditions.

Sustainable harvesting removes biomass at or below replacement rate.
Managed plant harvests and marine fish stocks require monitoring population recovery.
Sustainable does not mean no harvest; it means harvest does not exceed replacement.

A fish stock replaces 100 tonnes per year. Which harvest is most sustainable?

Choose

Audit Agriculture Sustainability

Agricultural sustainability depends on maintaining soil, nutrients, biodiversity, water, and climate impacts while producing food. Erosion and leaching remove soil and nutrients. Fertilizers, agrochemicals, irrigation, and carbon footprint can improve yield but also create environmental costs.

Agricultural sustainability depends on soil conservation, nutrient balance, and biodiversity.
Erosion, leaching, fertilizers, agrochemicals, irrigation, and carbon footprint are key factors.
Evaluation should weigh yield benefits against long-term ecosystem costs.

Sort each factor as support or risk for sustainability.

Sort
Unsorted
5
Supports sustainability
0
Can reduce sustainability if mismanaged
0

Sequence Eutrophication

Eutrophication follows a predictable oxygen-loss chain. Nitrate and phosphate enrichment stimulates algal blooms. When algae die, decomposers respire while breaking them down, increasing biochemical oxygen demand. Dissolved oxygen falls, causing hypoxia that harms aquatic life.

Eutrophication follows nitrate and phosphate enrichment of water.
Algal blooms, decomposition, high biochemical oxygen demand, and hypoxia harm aquatic life.
The key exam link is decomposition causing oxygen loss.

Eutrophication is easiest to explain as an ordered chain from nutrient enrichment to hypoxia.

Order eutrophication.

Order
1
algae die
2
algal bloom grows
3
decomposers respire more
4
biochemical oxygen demand rises
5
nitrates and phosphates enter water
6
oxygen falls and hypoxia harms aquatic life

Order eutrophication.

Choose
nitrates and phosphates enter water
algal bloom grows
algae die
decomposers respire more
biochemical oxygen demand rises
oxygen falls and hypoxia harms aquatic life

Track Toxins Up Food Chains

Biomagnification happens when persistent toxins become more concentrated at higher trophic levels. Organisms take in toxins faster than they excrete or break them down, and predators eat many contaminated prey. DDT and mercury are classic examples because top predators receive the highest doses.

Biomagnification increases toxin concentration at higher trophic levels.
DDT and mercury show how top predators receive the highest doses.
Do not confuse biomagnification with energy transfer; toxin concentration increases upward.

Persistent toxins become most concentrated in top predators because biomass and stored pollutants are consumed repeatedly.

Match each biomagnification idea to its explanation.

Match
Reasons
0/4

Match each biomagnification idea to its explanation.

Choose
persistent toxin
predator eats many prey
higher trophic level
top predator

Compare Macroplastics and Microplastics

Macroplastics and microplastics both persist in marine ecosystems, but their effects often differ by size. Macroplastics can entangle animals or be ingested. Microplastics form by fragmentation, move through food webs, and can transport toxins. Both can affect feeding, survival, and ecosystem stability.

Macroplastics and microplastics persist, fragment, and move through marine ecosystems.
Effects include entanglement, ingestion, toxin transport, and food-web impacts.
Microplastics are especially difficult to remove and track through food webs.

Sort each plastic impact.

Sort
Unsorted
5
Macroplastic impact
0
Microplastic impact
0
Both
0

Choose Rewilding Moves

Rewilding aims to restore natural processes rather than manage every detail. It can restore trophic interactions, habitat connectivity, and ecosystem dynamics. Keystone species reintroductions may restart trophic cascades, but good rewilding decisions consider risks, habitat suitability, and monitoring.

Rewilding restores natural processes, trophic interactions, and habitat connectivity.
Keystone species reintroductions can restart trophic cascades and reduce intensive management.
Rewilding should be evaluated using ecosystem process and risk evidence.

A reserve wants to reintroduce a keystone predator. Which decision is strongest?

Decision

Retrieve the Core Stability and Change Route

Review

Core D4.2 is secure when students can judge whether a system is being stabilized or pushed toward change. The route is: identify the stability support or disturbance, explain the mechanism, and state the ecosystem consequence using evidence.

energy, nutrient cycling, diversity, and tolerance ranges maintain persistence
Amazon deforestation and keystone removal can push systems toward instability
harvest and agriculture require recovery, soil, nutrients, biodiversity, and monitoring
eutrophication, biomagnification, and plastics harm ecosystems through specific mechanisms

Match each retrieval cue to its exam-use meaning.

Match
Reasons
0/4

Transfer: Explain Ecosystem Stability and Human Impact

Exam Practice

Core transfer questions ask students to explain why an ecosystem remains stable or why a disturbance pushes it toward change. Strong answers do not list threats; they explain mechanisms such as lost rainfall recycling, trophic cascade, overharvest, nutrient enrichment, toxin biomagnification, plastic movement, or restoration through rewilding.

Use stability requirements: energy input, nutrient cycling, biodiversity, genetic diversity, and abiotic tolerance ranges.
Explain disturbance mechanisms such as Amazon tipping points, trophic cascades, overharvesting, agricultural damage, eutrophication, biomagnification, plastics, or rewilding.
Support claims with evidence from controlled models, monitoring, food webs, or pollution pathways.

Explain how a named factor can maintain ecosystem stability or push an ecosystem toward change.

Explain how a named factor can maintain ecosystem stability or push an ecosystem toward change.

Choose

Match each exam move to the mark it earns.

Match
Reasons
0/3